Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

ChartDataSheet_ This worksheet contains values required for MegaStat charts. Boxplot 12/5/2012 16:43.50 2 1559681 2 XXXXXXXXXX 3 XXXXXXXXXX 3 XXXXXXXXXX 1 XXXXXXXXXX 3 XXXXXXXXXX 3 XXXXXXXXXX 2...

1 answer below »
ChartDataSheet_
    This worksheet contains values required for MegaStat charts.
    Boxplot 12/5/2012 16:43.50
    2    1559681
    2     XXXXXXXXXX
    3     XXXXXXXXXX
    3     XXXXXXXXXX
    1     XXXXXXXXXX
    3     XXXXXXXXXX
    3     XXXXXXXXXX
    2     XXXXXXXXXX
    2    3565718
    2     XXXXXXXXXX
    1     XXXXXXXXXX
    1     XXXXXXXXXX
    2     XXXXXXXXXX
    1     XXXXXXXXXX
    3     XXXXXXXXXX
    1     XXXXXXXXXX
    3     XXXXXXXXXX
    1     XXXXXXXXXX
    3     XXXXXXXXXX
    1     XXXXXXXXXX
    3     XXXXXXXXXX
    Dotplot 12/5/2012 16:44.17
    1559681    1
    1603596    1
    1607733    1
    1679013    1
    1721920    1
    1739859    1
    1965955    1
    2091918    1
    2099663    1
    2102240    1
    2123721    1
    2177617    1
    2219444    1
    2242803    1
    2347251    1
    2370794    1
    2420171    1
    2630458    1
    2776354    1
    2831385    1
    2882756    1
    3028033    1
    3043003    1
    3061770    1
    3262109    1
    3324246    1
    3377371    1
    3460280    1
    3542406    1
    3565718    1
2012 Season
    Team    League    Opened    Team Salary    Attendance    Wins    ERA    BA    HR                Year    Average Salary
    Arizona    National    1998    65.80    2080145    79    4.04    0.264    154                2000    1.99
    Atlanta    National    1996    89.60    2001392    67    4.41    0.251    100                2001    2.26
    Baltimore     American    1992    118.90    2281202    81    4.05    0.25    217                2002    2.38
    Boston     American    1912    168.70    2880694    78    4.31    0.265    161                2003    2.56
    Chicago Cubs    National    1914    117.20    2959812    97    3.36    0.244    171                2004    2.49
    Chicago White Sox    American    1991    110.70    1755810    76    3.98    0.25    136                2005    2.63
    Cincinnati    National    2003    117.70    2419506    64    4.33    0.248    167                2006    2.87
    Cleveland     American    1994    87.70    1388905    81    3.67    0.256    141                2007    2.94
    Colorado    National    1995    98.30    2506789    68    5.04    0.265    186                2008    3.15
    Detroit    American    2000    172.80    2726048    74    4.64    0.27    151                2009    3.24
    Houston    American    2000    69.10    2153585    86    3.57    0.25    230                2010    3.3
    Kansas City     American    1973    112.90    2708549    95    3.73    0.269    139                2011    3.31
    LA Angels    American    1966    146.40    3012765    85    3.94    0.246    176                2012    3.44
    LA Dodgers    National    1962    230.40    3764815    92    3.44    0.25    187                2013    3.65
    Miami    National    2012    84.60    1752235    71    4.02    0.26    120                2014    3.95
    Milwaukee    National    2001    98.70    2542558    68    4.28    0.251    145                2015    4.25
    Minnesota    American    2010    108.30    2220054    83    4.07    0.247    156                2016    4.4
    NY Mets    National    2009    100.10    2569753    90    3.43    0.244    177
    NY Yankees    American    2009    213.50    3193795    87    4.05    0.251    212
    Oakland    American    1966    80.80    1768175    68    4.14    0.251    146
    Philadelphia    National    2004    133.00    1831080    63    4.69    0.249    130
    Pittsburgh    National    2001    85.90    2498596    98    3.21    0.26    140
    San Diego    National    2004    126.60    2459742    74    4.09    0.243    148
    San Francisco    National    2000    166.50    3375882    84    3.72    0.267    136
    Seattle    American    1999    123.20    2193581    76    4.16    0.249    198
    St. Louis    National    2006    120.30    3520889    100    2.94    0.253    137
    Tampa Bay     American    1990    74.80    1287054    80    3.74    0.252    167
    Texas    American    1994    144.80    2491875    88    2.24    0.257    172
    Toronto    American    1989    116.40    2794891    93    3.8    0.269    232
    Washington    National    2008    174.50    2619843    83    3.62    0.251    177
Key
    Team = Team’s name
    League = American or National League
    Year Opened = First year the team’s stadium was used
    Team Salary = Total team salary expressed in millions of dollars
    Attendance = Total number of people attending regular season games
    Wins = Number of regular season games won
    ERA = Team earned run average
    BA = Team batting average
    HR = Team home runs
    Year = Year of operation
    Average salary = Average annual player salary in dollars

ChartDataSheet_
    This worksheet contains values required for MegaStat charts.
    Boxplot 1/28/2010 16:03.39
    2    741
    2    806
    3    806
    3    827
    1    827
    3    827
    3    851.5
    2    851.5
    2    908
    2    851.5
    1    851.5
    1    806
    2    806
    1    669.5
    3    669.5
    1    737.75
    3    737.75
    1    919.75
    3    919.75
    1    988
    3    988
    Boxplot 1/28/2010 16:06.08
    2    741
    2    806
    3    806
    3    827
    1    827
    3    827
    3    851.5
    2    851.5
    2    908
    2    851.5
    1    851.5
    1    806
    2    806
    1    669.5
    3    669.5
    1    737.75
    3    737.75
    1    919.75
    3    919.75
    1    988
    3    988
    Dotplot 1/28/2010 16:06.08
    741    1
    751    1
    757    1
    757    2
    760    1
    774    1
    775    1
    780    1
    784    1
    785    1
    790    1
    792    1
    798    1
    799    1
    799    2
    800    1
    802    1
    803    1
    804    1
    806    1
    806    2
    809    1
    812    1
    815    1
    815    2
    815    3
    816    1
    816    2
    817    1
    817    2
    817    3
    818    1
    819    1
    819    2
    821    1
    822    1
    823    1
    826    1
    827    1
    827    2
    827    3
    828    1
    830    1
    831    1
    832    1
    835    1
    836    1
    837    1
    838    1
    839    1
    842    1
    842    2
    842    3
    844    1
    845    1
    846    1
    847    1
    848    1
    849    1
    851    1
    853    1
    856    1
    857    1
    857    2
    858    1
    859    1
    859    2
    864    1
    865    1
    866    1
    866    2
    869    1
    870    1
    873    1
    874    1
    882    1
    883    1
    885    1
    895    1
    908    1
    Boxplot 1/28/2010 16:08.20
    2    741
    2    806
    3    806
    3    827
    1    827
    3    827
    3    851.5
    2    851.5
    2    895
    2    851.5
    1    851.5
    1    806
    2    806
    1    669.5
    3    669.5
    1    737.75
    3    737.75
    1    919.75
    3    919.75
    1    988
    3    988
    1.8    980
    1.8    1008
    Dotplot 1/28/2010 16:08.20
    741    1
    751    1
    757    1
    757    2
    760    1
    774    1
    775    1
    780    1
    784    1
    785    1
    790    1
    792    1
    798    1
    799    1
    799    2
    800    1
    802    1
    803    1
    804    1
    806    1
    806    2
    809    1
    812    1
    815    1
    815    2
    815    3
    816    1
    816    2
    817    1
    817    2
    817    3
    818    1
    819    1
    819    2
    821    1
    822    1
    823    1
    826    1
    827    1
    827    2
    827    3
    828    1
    830    1
    831    1
    832    1
    835    1
    836    1
    837    1
    838    1
    839    1
    842    1
    842    2
    842    3
    844    1
    845    1
    846    1
    847    1
    848    1
    849    1
    851    1
    853    1
    856    1
    857    1
    857    2
    858    1
    859    1
    859    2
    864    1
    865    1
    866    1
    866    2
    869    1
    870    1
    874    1
    882    1
    883    1
    885    1
    895    1
    980    1
    1008    1
Bus
    
    Data Set 3 --Lincolnville School District Bus Data
    ID    Manufacturer    Engine Type (0=diesel)    Capacity    Maintenance Cost    Age    Odometer Miles    Miles
    10    Keiser    1    14    4646    5    54375    11973
    396    Thompson    0    14    1072    2    21858    11969
    122    Bluebird    1    55    9394    10    116580    11967
    751    Keiser    0    14    1078    2    22444    11948
    279    Bluebird    0    55    1008    2    22672    11925
    500    Bluebird    1    55    5329    5    50765    11922                Variables
    520    Bluebird    0    55    4794    10    119130    11896
    759    Keiser    0    55    3952    8    87872    11889                ID = Bus identification numbe
    714    Bluebird    0    42    3742    7    73703    11837
    875    Bluebird    0    55    4376    9    97947    11814                Manufacturer = Source of the bus (Bluebird, Keiser, or Thompson)
    600    Bluebird    0    55    4832    10    119860    11800
    953    Bluebird    0    55    5160    10    117700    11798                Engine type = If the engine is diesel then engine type = 0; if the engine is gasoline, then engine type = 1)
    101    Bluebird    0    55    1955    4    41096    11789
    358    Bluebird    0    55    2775    6    70086    11782                Capacity = number of seats on the bus
    29    Bluebird    1    55    5352    6    69438    11781
    365    Keiser    0    55    3065    6    63384    11778                Maintenance cost = dollars spent to maintain a bus last yea
    162    Keiser    1    55    3143    3    31266    11757
    686    Bluebird    0    55    1569    3    34674    11707                Age = number of years since the bus left the manufacture
    370    Keiser    1    55    7766    8    86528    11704
    887    Bluebird    0    55    3743    8    93672    11698                Odometer Miles = total number of miles traveled by a bus
    464    Bluebird    1    55    2540    3    34530    11698
    948    Keiser    0    42    4342    9    97956    11691                Miles = number of miles traveled since last maintenance
    678    Keiser    0    55    3361    7    75229    11668
    481    Keiser    1    6    3097    3    34362    11662
    43    Bluebird    1    55    8263    9    102969    11615
    704    Bluebird    0    55    4218    8    83424    11610
    814    Bluebird    0    55    2028    4    40824    11576
    39    Bluebird    1    55    5821    6    69444    11533
    699    Bluebird    1    55    9069    9    98307    11518
    75    Bluebird    0    55    3011    6    71970    11462
    693    Keiser    1    55    9193    9    101889    11461
    989    Keiser    0    55    4795    9    106605    11418
    982    Bluebird    0    55    505    1    10276    11359
    321    Bluebird    0    42    2732    6    70122    11358
    724    Keiser    0    42    3754    8    91968    11344
    732    Keiser    0    42    4640    9    101196    11342
    880    Keiser    1    55    8410    9    97065    11336
    193    Thompson    0    14    5922    11    128711    11248
    884    Bluebird    0    55    4364    9    92457    11231
    57    Bluebird    0    55    3190    7    79240    11222
    731    Bluebird    0    42    3213    6    68526    11168
    61    Keiser    0    55    4139    9    103536    11148
    135    Bluebird    0    55    3560    7    76426    11127
    833    Thompson    0    14    3920    8    90968    11112
    671    Thompson    1    14    6733    8    89792    11100
    692    Bluebird    0    55    3770    8    93248    11048
    200    Bluebird    0    55    5168    10    103700    11018
    754    Keiser    0    14    7380    14    146860    11003
    540    Bluebird    1    55    3656    4    45284    10945
    660    Bluebird    1    55    6213    6    64434    10911
    353    Keiser    1    55    4279    4    45744    10902
    482    Bluebird    1    55    10575    10    116534    10802
    398    Thompson    0    6    4752    9    95922    10802
    984    Bluebird    0    55    3809    8    87664    10760
    977    Bluebird    0    55    3769    7    79422    10759
    705    Keiser    0    42    2152    4    47596    10755
    767    Keiser    0    55    2985    6    71538    10726
    326    Bluebird    0    55    4563    9    107343    10724
    120    Keiser    0    42    4723    10    110320    10674
    554    Bluebird    0    42    1826    4    44604    10662
    695    Bluebird    0    55    1061    2    23152    10633
    9    Keiser    1    55    3527    4    46848    10591
    861    Bluebird    1    55    9669    10    106040    10551
    603    Keiser    0    14    2116    4    44384    10518
    156    Thompson    0    14    6212    12    140460    10473
    427    Keiser    1    55    6927    7    73423    10355
    883    Bluebird    1    55    1881    2    20742    10344
    168    Thompson    1    14    7004    7    83006    10315
    954    Bluebird    0    42    5284    10    101000    10235
    768    Bluebird    0    42    3173    7    71778    10227
    490    Bluebird    1    55    10133    10    106240    10210
    725    Bluebird    0    55    2356    5    57065    10209
    45    Keiser    0    55    3124    6    60102    10167
    38    Keiser    1    14    5976    6    61662    10140
    314    Thompson    0    6    5408    11    128117    10128
    507    Bluebird    0    55    3690    7    72849    10095
    40    Bluebird    1    55    9573    10    118470    10081
    918    Bluebird    0    55    2470    5    53620    10075
    387    Bluebird    1    55    6863    8    89960    10055
    418    Bluebird    0    55    4513    9    104715    10000

Chapter 11 – Problem 14
The null and alternate hypotheses are:
H0: μ1 ≤ μ2
H1: μ1 > μ2
A random sample of 20 items from the first population showed a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. A sample of 16 items for the second population showed a mean of 94 and a standard deviation of 8. Use the .05 significant level.
https:
www.slader.com/discussion/question/the-null-and-alternate-hypotheses-area-random-sample-of-20-items-from-the-first-population-showed-a
Chapter 11 – Problem 41
                                        Operating Room
                                            A    B    C    D    E    F    H    H
                                        Before    6.6    6.5    9    10.3    11.2    8.1    6.3    11.6
                                        After    6.8    2.4    7.4    8.5    8.1    6.1    3.4    2
An investigation of the effectiveness of an antibacterial soap in reducing operating room contamination resulted in the accompanying table. The new soap was tested in a sample of eight operating rooms in the greater Seattle area during the last year. The following table reports the contamination levels before and after the use of the soap for each operating room.
At the .05 significance level, can we conclude the contamination measurements are lower after use of the new soap?
Chapter 11 – Problem 48
Refer to the Baseball 2016 data, which report information on the 30 Major League Baseball teams for the 2016 season.
a. At the .05 significance level, can we conclude that there is a difference in the mean salary of teams in the American League versus teams in the National League?
. At the .05 significance level, can we conclude that there is a difference in the mean home attendance of teams in the American League versus teams in the National League?
c. Compute the mean and the standard deviation of the number of wins for the 10 teams with the highest salaries. Do the same for the 10 teams with the lowest salaries. At the .05 significance level, is there a difference in the mean number of wins for the two groups? At the .05 significance level, is there a difference in the mean attendance for the two groups?
Chapter 11 – Problem 49
Refer to the Lincolnville School District bus data. Is there a difference in the mean maintenance cost for the diesel versus the gasoline buses? Use the .05 significance level.
Chapter 12 Case A – Century Nat
A. Century National BankRefer to the description of Century National Bank on page 129 at the end of the Review of Chapters 1–4. With many other options available, customers no lon-ger let their money sit in a checking account. For many years the mean checking balance has been $1,600. Do the sample data indicate that the mean account balance has declined from this value? Recent years have also seen an increase in the use of ATM machines. When Mr. Selig took over the bank, the mean number of transactions per month per customer was 8; now he believes it has increased to more than 10. In fact, the advertising agency that prepares TV commercials for Century would like to use this on the new commercial being designed. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean number of transac-tions per customer is more than 10 per month? Could the advertising agency say the mean is more than 9 per month? The bank has
anch offices in four different cities: Cincinnati, Ohio; Atlanta, Georgia; Louisville, Kentucky; and Erie, Pennsylvania. Mr. Selig would like to know whether there is a difference in the mean checking ac-count balances among the four
anches. If there are differences, between which
anches do these differences occur? Mr. Selig is also interested in the bank’s ATMs. Is there a difference in ATM use among the
anches? Also, do customers who have debit cards tend to use ATMs differently from those who do not have debit cards? Is there a difference in ATM use by those with checking accounts that pay interest versus those that do not? Prepare a report for Mr. Selig answering these questions.
Answered Same Day Sep 21, 2021

Solution

Mohd answered on Sep 22 2021
150 Votes
Chapter 11 – Problem 14
    
                                        sample size    sample mean    st.dev    alpha=0.05
                                        20    100    15
                                        16    94    8
                                    DF    34
                                    Numerator    6
                                sample mean squre 1    11.25
                                sample mean squre 2    4.00
                                sum    15.25
                                Sqrt of sample meam squre sum    3.91
                                t_value    1.54
                                Critical value    2.03    Alpha = 0.05, df= 34
                                        As we have t-value less than critical value we will accept the null hypothesis.
The null and alternate hypotheses are:
H0: μ1 ≤ μ2
H1: μ1 > μ2
A random sample of 20 items from the first population showed a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. A sample of 16 items for the second population showed a mean of 94 and a standard deviation of 8. Use the .05 significant level.
https:
www.slader.com/discussion/question/the-null-and-alternate-hypotheses-area-random-sample-of-20-items-from-the-first-population-showed-a
Chapter 11 – Problem 41
                                        Operating Room
                                            A    B    C    D    E    F    H    H    t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
                                        Before    6.6    6.5    9    10.3    11.2    8.1    6.3    11.6
                                        After    6.8    2.4    7.4    8.5    8.1    6.1    3.4    2        Before    Afte
                                                                            Mean    8.7    5.5875
                                                                            Variance    4.6685714286    6.8041071429
                                                                            Observations    8    8
                                                                            Pearson Co
elation    0.2658886949
                                                                            Hypothesized Mean Difference    0
                                                                            df    7
                                                                            t Stat    3.0239233218
                                                                            P(T<=t) one-tail    0.0096396128
                                                                            t Critical one-tail    1.8945786037
                                                                            P(T<=t) two-tail    0.0192792256
                                                                            t Critical two-tail    2.3646242509
                                                                            Yes, the contamination measurements are lower after use of the new soap.
An investigation of the effectiveness of an antibacterial soap in reducing operating room contamination resulted in the accompanying table. The new soap was tested in a sample of eight operating rooms in the greater Seattle area during the last year. The following table reports the contamination levels before and after the use of the soap for each operating room.
At the .05 significance level, can we conclude the contamination measurements are lower after use of the new soap?
sol11;48;a
    t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
        American    National            data analysis toolpack
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
select salary data
click ok
    Mean    123.27    120.61
    Variance    1611.84    1795.65
    Observations    15    15
    Pearson Co
elation    -0.33
    Hypothesized Mean Difference    0.00
    df    14.00
    t Stat    0.15
    P(T<=t) one-tail    0.44
    t Critical one-tail    1.76
    P(T<=t) two-tail    0.88
    t Critical two-tail    2.14
        Salary is relatively higher for American teams than national team.
data 11;48;a
    
        American    National
        118.90    65.8
        168.70    89.6
        110.70    117.2
        87.70    117.7
        172.80    98.3
        69.10    230.4
        112.90    84.6
        146.40    98.7
        108.30    100.1
        213.50    133
        80.80    85.9
        123.20    126.6
        74.80    166.5
        144.80    120.3
        116.40    174.5
t test for 11;48;
    t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
        American    National
    Mean    2323798.86666667    2593535.8        t
    Variance    338601203389.267    353572512947.315
    Observations    15    15
    Pearson Co
elation    -0.4499998444
    Hypothesized Mean Difference    0
    df    14
    t Stat    -1.0428222324
    P(T<=t) one-tail    0.1573522121
    t Critical one-tail    1.7613101151
    P(T<=t) two-tail    0.3147044241
    t Critical two-tail    2.1447866813
    same conclusion by student t.test.
chapter 11;48;b part
    American        National
    Mean    2323798.87    Mean    2593535.80        data analysis toolpack
descriptive statistics
select Attendance
click ok
    Standard E
or    150244.51    Standard E
or    153530.13
    Median    2281202.00    Median    2506789.00
    Standard Deviation    581894.50    Standard Deviation    594619.64
    Sample Variance    338601203389.27    Sample Variance    353572512947.32
    Kurtosis    -0.79    Kurtosis    -0.21
    Skewness    -0.38    Skewness    0.60
    Range    1906741.00    Range    2012580.00
    Minimum    1287054.00    Minimum    1752235.00
    Maximum    3193795.00    Maximum    3764815.00
    Sum    34856983.00    Sum    38903037.00
    Count    15.00    Count    15.00
    Confidence Level(95.0%)    322242.43    Confidence Level(95.0%)    329289.38
    National team has higher mean attendance than American team as displayed vin cell B3: D3.
11;48;2
    American    National
    2281202    2080145
    2880694    2001392
    1755810    2959812
    1388905    2419506
    2726048    2506789
    2153585    3764815
    2708549    1752235
    3012765    2542558
    2220054    2569753
    3193795    1831080
    1768175    2498596
    2193581    2459742
    1287054    3375882
    2491875    3520889
    2794891    2619843
Chapter 11 – Problem 48
    
                                    Team    League    Opened    Team Salary    Attendance    Wins    ERA    BA    HR                Year    Average Salary
                                    Baltimore    American    1992    118.90    2281202    81    4.05    0.25    217                2000    1.99
                                    Boston    American    1912    168.70    2880694    78    4.31    0.265    161                2001    2.26
                                    Chicago White Sox    American    1991    110.70    1755810    76    3.98    0.25    136                2002    2.38
                                    Cleveland    American    1994    87.70    1388905    81    3.67    0.256    141                2003    2.56
                                    Detroit    American    2000    172.80    2726048    74    4.64    0.27    151                2004    2.49
                                    Houston    American    2000    69.10    2153585    86    3.57    0.25    230                2005    2.63
                                    Kansas City    American    1973    112.90    2708549    95    3.73    0.269    139                2006    2.87
                                    LA Angels    American    1966    146.40    3012765    85    3.94    0.246    176                2007    2.94
                                    Minnesota    American    2010    108.30    2220054    83    4.07    0.247    156                2008    3.15
                                    NY Yankees    American    2009    213.50    3193795    87    4.05    0.251    212                2009    3.24
                                    Oakland    American    1966    80.80    1768175    68    4.14    0.251    146                2010    3.3
                                    Seattle    American    1999    123.20    2193581    76    4.16    0.249    198                2011    3.31
                                    Tampa Bay    American    1990    74.80    1287054    80    3.74    0.252    167                2012    3.44
                                    Texas    American    1994    144.80    2491875    88    2.24    0.257    172                2013    3.65
                                    Toronto    American    1989    116.40    2794891    93    3.8    0.269    232                2014    3.95
                                    Arizona    National    1998    65.80    2080145    79    4.04    0.264    154                2015    4.25
                                    Atlanta    National    1996    89.60    2001392    67    4.41    0.251    100                2016    4.4
                                    Chicago...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here