Part AQuestion 1: Report 20 marksYour manager Peter Smith wants you to write a report detailing how you will gather the functional and non-functional requirements for the new ATP system.
The following sections need to be included;
- Stakeholders including justification of why they are a stakeholder.
- Information gathering techniques
- Include at least three techniques
- The objective of the information gathering technique
- What information you are looking for, what stakeholders you are targeting and how you are going to get the information
For example, for an interview you need to list;
- The objective of the interview
- The stakeholder you are interviewing and why.
- The questions you will ask.
- How these questions will fulfil the interview objective.
- List the different components of the new system and how you will deploy the system (direct, parallel or phased deployment) including justification for the deployment choice from the case study,
Your target audience is executive business people, who have extensive business experience but limited computing knowledge.
Your essay should be no less than one thousand XXXXXXXXXXwords and it would be best to be no longer than one thousand five hundred XXXXXXXXXXwords long. Appropriate referencing is required. The textbook Satzinger et. al is a valid resource, however it is expected that at least five (5) other resources will also be used.
| Marking Criteria | Maximum Marks | Marks Obtained |
| Answers | Use of Report Format | 2 |
Professional communication (correct spelling, grammar, formal business language used)
> | 1 |
1. Stakeholders
> | 3 |
2. Stakeholder justification
> | 1 |
3. Information gathering technique 1
> | 3 |
4. Information gathering technique 2
> | 3 |
5. Information gathering technique 3
> | 3 |
6. Components of new system
> | 2 |
| 8. Deployment | 2 |
| Total (I) = | 20 | 0 |
Question 2: Memo 20 marksReview the ATP Limited case study and answer the following question with reference to the information in the case study.
Your manager has requested that you write a brief memorandum for the owner Peter Smith commenting on,
two adaptive systems development, such as Scrum, XP and UP that you would use to develop this system. Briefly discuss the methodology and then state why you would recommend
one methodology. It is expected that you use the detail from the case study in your essay and failure to do this will reduce your marks.
Your target audience is executive business people, who have extensive business experience but limited computing knowledge.
Attach this memo to your report from question 1 as an appendix.There is limited information available to you at this time but you are required to make reasonable assumptions based on the information that you have. Assumptions should be noted and specifically mentioned within your memo. Your memo should be no less than seven hundred and fifty (750) words and it would be best to be no longer than one thousand XXXXXXXXXXwords long.
| Marking Criteria | Maximum Marks | Marks Obtained |
| Answers | Use of Memo Format | 1 |
Professional communication (correct spelling, grammar, formal business language used)
> | 2 |
1. Description of adaptive methodology 1
> | 6 |
2. Description of adaptive methodology 2
> | 6 |
3. Recommendation - Theory applied to case study
> | 5 |
| Total (I) = | 20 | 0 |
Part BModelling and DiagrammingReview the Acme Trading Place case study and answer the following questions with reference to the information in the case study.
Do NOT extend the scope for any of the following solutions beyond that specifically described in the case study above.
You are permitted to make reasonable assumptions where necessary but these should be noted.
It is recommended that you review all documentation for this case study before finalising any single solution. Ensure that the required consistency has been included within and between each question solution.
Question 3: Event Table 20 marksReview the ATP Limited case study and prepare an
event table for the information system to support the business processes as described. Use at least the following headings for the Event Table:
| Event | Event Type | Trigger | Source | Activity/Use Case | System Response/
Output | Destination |
| 20 | 18 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 0 |
| Outstanding: | High Distinction: | Distinction: | Credit: | Pass: | Fail: | Not Submitted: |
| An outstanding attempt – well formatted and professionally presented piece of work. | An excellent piece of work that meets all the specified criteria with very minor omissions or mistakes | More than competently meets the criteria specified with only minor mistakes or omissions. | Competently meets the criteria as specified with few minor mistakes or omissions. | Satisfactorily meets the criteria. | Did not sufficiently meet the criteria to pass. | No attempt made or different from what is acceptable |
Question 4: Domain Model Class Diagram 20 MarksReview the ATP Limited case study to prepare a
domain model class diagram for the supporting information system.
Solutions must follow the methodology as outlined within the Satzinger et al textbook. Solutions are expected to show:
- The class name and attributes list for each class and sub class as required
- All required associations
- All attributes as specifically mentioned in the case study must be reflected
- Other attributes as needed to support the described functionality.
It is not necessary to show methods, however you may include them if you wish. Solutions are expected to align with the components as shown in figure 4-21.
| 20 | 18 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 0 |
| Outstanding: | High Distinction: | Distinction: | Credit: | Pass: | Fail: | Not Submitted: |
| An outstanding attempt – well formatted and professionally presented piece of work. | An excellent piece of work that meets all the specified criteria with very minor omissions or mistakes | More than competently meets the criteria specified with only minor mistakes or omissions. | Competently meets the criteria as specified with few minor mistakes or omissions. | Satisfactorily meets the criteria. | Did not sufficiently meet the criteria to pass. | No attempt made or different from what is acceptable |
Question 5: Design Class Diagram 5 MarksPrepare a Design class diagram for the
Customer and
Sale classes ONLY
. These two classes should be part of the Domain model class diagram solution for the previous question.
Each of these design class diagrams are expected to have a complete attributes list and a comprehensive methods list which supports the specified functionality as described in the case study.
Solutions must follow the methodology as outlined within the Satzinger et al textbook. Solutions are expected to align with the components for the ‘Design class diagram for Student’ as shown on the right hand of figure 10-8.
| 5 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Outstanding: | High Distinction: | Distinction: | Credit: | Pass: | Fail: | Not Submitted: |
| An outstanding attempt – well formatted and professionally presented piece of work. | An excellent piece of work that meets all the specified criteria with very minor omissions or mistakes | More than competently meets the criteria specified with only minor mistakes or omissions. | Competently meets the criteria as specified with few minor mistakes or omissions. | Satisfactorily meets the criteria. | Did not sufficiently meet the criteria to pass. | No attempt made or different from what is acceptable |
Question 6: Use Case Diagram 10 MarksReview the ATP Limited case study and your event table solution from question 1 to prepare a
Use Case diagram for the supporting information system.
Solutions must follow the methodology as outlined within the Satzinger et al textbook. Solutions are expected to align with the components as shown in figures 3-13 and 3-16.
| 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
| Outstanding: | High Distinction: | Distinction: | Credit: | Pass: | Fail: | Not Submitted: |
| An outstanding attempt – well formatted and professionally presented piece of work. | An excellent piece of work that meets all the specified criteria with very minor omissions or mistakes | More than competently meets the criteria specified with only minor mistakes or omissions. | Competently meets the criteria as specified with few minor mistakes or omissions. | Satisfactorily meets the criteria. | Did not sufficiently meet the criteria to pass. | No attempt made or different from what is acceptable |
Question 7: Use Case Description (intermediate) 5 MarksPrepare a
Use Case intermediate description for the
'Creates Customer' use case, as documented in the event table solution and the use case diagram solution.
Solutions must follow the methodology as outlined within the Satzinger et al textbook. Solutions are expected to align with the components as shown in figure 5-2.
| 5 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Outstanding: | High Distinction: | Distinction: | Credit: | Pass: | Fail: | Not Submitted: |
| An outstanding attempt – well formatted and professionally presented piece of work. | An excellent piece of work that meets all the specified criteria with very minor omissions or mistakes | More than competently meets the criteria specified with only minor mistakes or omissions. | Competently meets the criteria as specified with few minor mistakes or omissions. | Satisfactorily meets the criteria. | Did not sufficiently meet the criteria to pass. | No attempt made or different from what is acceptable |