Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Questions for Case Study III 1. Per the average product sales demographic per store outlined on page 2 of the case study, how was the Ban Boredom strategy intended to enhance financial performance of...

1 answer below »


Questions for Case Study III
1. Per the average product sales demographic per store outlined on page 2 of the case study, how was the Ban Boredom strategy intended to enhance financial performance of each store? Analytically, using the data in Exhibit 4, perform a single regression analysis between Future Controllable Contribution and the Ban Boredom Score? In terms of gauging the intended financial performance of the strategy what should be your expectation for such an analysis? Did your analysis meet this expectation? If not, what might be some of the financial reasons why the strategy is not effective?
2. How was the Companies implementation strategy different between the Ban Boredom Strategy and the Cause You Just Can’t Wait Strategy? (See page 3). Do you feel the companies approach was appropriate for each? Based on the high reliance on Crew and Mgr. Skill in successfully implementing the Ban Boredom Strategy, perform a regression analysis and compare each against the Ban Boredom strategy, does your analysis support the company expectation? How does Cause You Just Can’t Wait Strategy influence Crew Skill and the success of Ban Boredom?
3. Prepare a multiple regression analysis using the data in Exhibit 4 and split the stores based on those stores with a Crew Skill above the Median, and those below. How do the results differ and what may this indicate regarding the success of the strategy? For those stores with a relatively low Crew Skill what might you implement to enhance these skills?
4. Comment on the company’s use of the balance scorecard to evaluate employee performance and identify operational improvements. How was the variable compensation of store management linked to financial performance, do you feel this is a solid plan, what might you do to enhance it?
5. Perform a regression analysis comparing Future Controllable Contribution with population, per captia income and number of competitors. What does this analysis indicate? Given the fact that 30 of the 75 stores are located in u
an areas and the average rent on a 2,100 square foot store is $49,000, how might this analysis influence how the company negotiates with landlords, and how changing geographic store locations could enhance performance?
Due Date:
    

Sheet1
    Store #    Futrure Controllable Contribution    CYJCW Score    Ban Boredom Score    Crew Skill    Manager Skill    Population    Income     Competitors        Y^    Y    Y^
    1510    $23,000    84.93    71.43    2.35    2.2    17,754    $27,084    6
    1711    $25,419    88.8    75.00    2.87    2.52    8,966    $47,712    2
    1514    $21,164    95.41    117.86    2.93    3.85    21,550    $22,935    4
    1507    $24,637    95.42    85.71    3.09    4.23    16,926    $25,744    5
    1513    $22,695    83.28    92.86    3.10    2.41    16,381    $38,252    1                            Y^ = b0 + b1*X1 + b2*X2+b3*X3+b4*X4+B5*X5+b6*X6
    1709    $22,314    91.37    78.57    3.10    3.63    13,297    $17,308    7
    1710    $22,273    96.36    117.86    3.20    4.16    19,808    $34,333    3
    1573    $22,734    78.63    67.86    3.23    4.04    14,859    $8,182    5
    1579    $18,871    92.85    121.43    2.80    2.59    10,532    $8,181    7
    1577    $18,007    83.93    121.43    2.85    3.28    3,747    $18,036    3
    1586    $17,874    90.59    135.71    2.88    3.12    3,014    $22,384    3
    1544    $20,200    96.56    135.71    2.89    3.07    10,923    $32,042    3
    1515    $17,897    88.93    128.57    3.10    2.81    11,160    $14,589    7
    1704    $20,886    96.65    125.00    3.11    3.52    3,151    $18,198    3
    1537    $21,373    95.86    125.00    3.16    3.95    1,116    $23,056    2
    1598    $38,573    87.14    67.86    3.34    3.21    19,809    $23,550    6
    1512    $44,141    92.2    114.29    3.37    2.85    26,519    $29,411    6
    1543    $43,364    85.91    119.93    3.63    3.57    8,177    $10,746    4
    1558    $40,403    90.58    82.14    3.64    3.43    20,624    $18,850    7
    1702    $43,222    90.14    110.71    4.05    3.71    3,265    $18,197    6
    1570    $46,308    92.19    110.71    4.20    3.17    3,126    $55,416    1
    1568    $40,576    81.74    78.57    4.38    2.69    14,653    $52,821    3
    1560    $47,453    96.19    135.71    3.27    3.6    17,808    $21,034    3
    1503    $42,776    82.14    128.57    3.28    3.4    9,695    $15,091    4
    1546    $44,599    88.75    125.00    3.44    3.55    3,218    $18,467    4
    1516    $45,936    95.48    128.57    3.63    3.91    14,186    $14,153    5
    1547    $44,054    90.63    125.00    3.65    3.33    8,870    $15,279    4
    1542    $42,128    79.67    128.57    3.68    3.07    9,697    $12,258    5
    1517    $45,481    91.28    135.71    3.80    3.66    6,898    $15,749    6
    1566    $46,280    94.79    128.57    4.40    3.42    8,491    $12,388    4


Questions for Case Study III
1. Per the average product sales demographic per store outlined on page 2 of the case study, how was the Ban Boredom strategy intended to enhance financial performance of each store? Analytically, using the data in Exhibit 4, perform a single regression analysis between Future Controllable Contribution and the Ban Boredom Score? In terms of gauging the intended financial performance of the strategy what should be your expectation for such an analysis? Did your analysis meet this expectation? If not, what might be some of the financial reasons why the strategy is not effective?
2. How was the Companies implementation strategy different between the Ban Boredom Strategy and the Cause You Just Can’t Wait Strategy? (See page 3). Do you feel the companies approach was appropriate for each? Based on the high reliance on Crew and Mgr. Skill in successfully implementing the Ban Boredom Strategy, perform a regression analysis and compare each against the Ban Boredom strategy, does your analysis support the company expectation? How does Cause You Just Can’t Wait Strategy influence Crew Skill and the success of Ban Boredom?
3. Prepare a multiple regression analysis using the data in Exhibit 4 and split the stores based on those stores with a Crew Skill above the Median, and those below. How do the results differ and what may this indicate regarding the success of the strategy? For those stores with a relatively low Crew Skill what might you implement to enhance these skills?
4. Comment on the company’s use of the balance scorecard to evaluate employee performance and identify operational improvements. How was the variable compensation of store management linked to financial performance, do you feel this is a solid plan, what might you do to enhance it?
5. Perform a regression analysis comparing Future Controllable Contribution with population, per captia income and number of competitors. What does this analysis indicate? Given the fact that 30 of the 75 stores are located in u
an areas and the average rent on a 2,100 square foot store is $49,000, how might this analysis influence how the company negotiates with landlords, and how changing geographic store locations could enhance performance?
Due Date:
    
Answered 4 days After Mar 31, 2022

Solution

Mohd answered on Apr 05 2022
86 Votes
Questions for Case Study III
1. Per the average product sales demographic per store outlined on page 2 of the case study, how was the Ban Boredom strategy intended to enhance financial performance of each store? Analytically, using the data in Exhibit 4, perform a single regression analysis between Future Controllable Contribution and the Ban Boredom Score? In terms of gauging the intended financial performance of the strategy what should be your expectation for such an analysis? Did your analysis meet this expectation? If not, what might be some of the financial reasons why the strategy is not effective?
A. The association between Ban boredom and Future Controllable Contribution is positive and week, which implies Ban boredom did not have strong influence toward Future Controllable Contribution. We have built regression model. F(1,28)=0.79 | P-value>0.05. Hence, our model is statistically insignificant.
    SUMMARY OUTPUT
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Regression Statistics
    
    
    
    
    Multiple R
    0.17
    
    
    
    
    R Square
    0.03
    
    
    
    
    Adjusted R Square
    -0.01
    
    
    
    
    Standard E
o
    11679.49
    
    
    
    
    Observations
    30.00
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ANOVA
    
    
    
    
    
    Â 
    df
    SS
    MS
    F
    Significance F
    Regression
    1.00
    108441716.91
    108441716.91
    0.79
    0.38
    Residual
    28.00
    3819494728.96
    136410526.03
    
    
    Total
    29.00
    3927936445.87
    Â 
    Â 
    Â 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Â 
    Coefficients
    Standard E
o
    t Stat
    P-value
    Lower 95%
    Intercept
    23278.38
    10546.95
    2.21
    0.04
    1673.93
    Ban Boredom Score
    83.22
    93.34
    0.89
    0.38
    -107.97
2. How was the Companies implementation strategy different between the Ban Boredom Strategy and the Cause You Just Can’t Wait Strategy? (See page 3). Do you feel the companies approach was appropriate for each? Based on the high reliance on Crew and Mgr. Skill in successfully implementing the Ban Boredom Strategy, perform a regression analysis and compare each against the Ban Boredom strategy, does your analysis support the company expectation? How does Cause You Just Can’t Wait Strategy influence Crew Skill and the success of Ban...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here