(Mohammed) Assignment brief XXXXXXXXXX
E-Submission Date: Thursday, 14th January 2021
Your community has identified that loneliness is an area of health they would like your help with. Please outline what this community project will deliver in order to develop a healthier community through addressing the topic of loneliness. This health orientated project will demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of underpinning theory related to Community Development and how this works to addressing the chosen community health issue.
Your proposal will include the following:
1. Introduction
It should be concise briefly outline the focus and contents of your proposal.
2. Background
This section will include details on the broad term of community and details on the specific community you are targeting.
You will succinctly state the Aim of your project. This section must be underpinned with relevant evidence in order to provide a solid rationale and focus for the area of loneliness your project will tackle for this specific community.
3. Community Profile
3.1 This could include socio-demographic factors, the resources the community holds and also outline the community assets, weaknesses, opportunities and threats
3.2 Clearly outlined target audience
4. Your Community Project
4.1 State the Aim and Objectives ( which can be measured – What will it do?)
4.2 Apply ALL five principles of Community Development to your project
4.2.1 Social Justice
4.2.2 Participation
4.2.3 Education/Learning
4.2.4 Equality
4.2.5 Collaboration/Cooperation
4.3 Outline the resources your project will require
4.4 Outline the project activity/ies
4.5 State the delivery and implementation processes (e:g; how you will reach/attract your specific target audience. Where the project will take place. How long will the project run for)
4.6 Identify a suitable stream of funding your project could apply for
5. Evaluation of your community project
State how you will evaluate the project’s effectiveness using suitable methods in accordance to the project design. In order for effective change to be noted a baseline assessment must occur so all projects will need to state how this information will be captured.
6. Conclusion
Close the proposal through encapsulating the proposal’s Aim and Objectives
Academic presentation/style: All work should be presented concisely, grammatically correct and aligned correctly to the University of Wolverhampton Harvard referencing handbook.
Your work will be marked according to the University level 5 grade descriptors.
Level 5 Grade descriptors
| Percentage | Descriptor |
| 90-100% Outstanding | Exceptionally detailed and original response to the assessment, with critical use of independently sourced contextual material. Outstanding demonstration of linked understanding and application of relevant theory, concepts and models. Extremely well structured with high level of analysis. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. |
| 80-89% Excellent | Very full, independent response to the assessment with totally relevant material which is well beyond any module input, demonstrating independent study. Excellent understanding and application of relevant theory, concepts and models. Very clear logical structure. Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. |
| 70-79% Very good | Full response to the assessment with all content relevant and focused. Very good understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Application of appropriate theory to examples/practice, demonstrating a rigorous approach to a variety of ideas, contexts and frameworks. Few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. |
| 60-69% Good | Answers most if not all detailed aspects of the question. Content mainly relevant and accurate. Good knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and application of theoretical models. Evidence of a developing appreciation of contextual issues. Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate |
| 50-59% Competent | Main issues addressed and solid attempt to answer question. Some relevant content applied. Sound knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and identification of main issues. Some repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. |
| 40-49% Pass | Satisfactory attempt to address question/issues with some content relevant to assessment topic. Material engages with relevant module materials, but largely repeats taught input and lacks development or personal interpretation. Some general understanding of topic theory and concepts. Lacks coherence. |
| 30-39% Fail | Some learning outcomes and / or assessment criteria not met. Question not answered fully. Content not wholly relevant. Little or no evidence of understanding of relevant theory. Very repetitive of taught input with no development or application. The use of extensive quoted passages evident. Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the student will be able to retrieve the module on resubmission. |
| 20-29% Fail | No learning outcomes fully met. Little attempt to engage with the module materials or ideas. |
| 10% - 19% Fail | Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice. |
| 0-9% Fail | No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes |