Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Module 3: Interview With Informatics Nurse (IN) or Technology Specialist NR515 Module 3 Interview Assignment...

1 answer below »

Module 3: Interview With Informatics Nurse (IN) or Technology Specialist



















































NR515 Module 3 Interview Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts


Introduction









30 pts


Distinguished

Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: Introduction provides a detailed overview of the interviewee including: • general practice setting of interviewee • employment background of interviewee • education background of the interviewee • without disclosing either the interviewee name or the name of their organization









28 pts


Exceeds

Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • general practice setting of interviewee • employment background of interviewee • education background of the interviewee • without disclosing either the interviewee name or the name of their organization









26 pts


Proficient

Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: • general practice setting of interviewee • employment background of interviewee • education background of the interviewee • without disclosing either the interviewee name or the name of their organization









0 pts


Needs Improvement

Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • general practice setting of interviewee • employment background of interviewee • education background of the interviewee • without disclosing either the interviewee name or the name of their organization








/ 30 pts



Interview Results









60 pts


Distinguished

Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • key responsibilities of the interviewee are summarized on the template with an emphasis on describing the NI or Technology specialist • sources of data used to support quality improvement • theoretical framework and model utilized • degree to which the interviewee functions as a member of an interdisciplinary/inter-professional team as an MSN level leader and decision-maker.









56 pts


Exceeds

Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • key responsibilities of the interviewee are summarized on the template with an emphasis on describing the NI or Technology specialist • sources of data used to support quality improvement • theoretical framework and model utilized degree to which the interviewee functions as a member of an interdisciplinary/inter-professional team as an MSN level leader and decision-maker.









51 pts


Proficient

Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: • key responsibilities of the interviewee are summarized on the template with an emphasis on describing the NI or Technology specialist • sources of data used to support quality improvement • theoretical framework and model utilized degree to which the interviewee functions as a member of an interdisciplinary/inter-professional team as an MSN level leader and decision-maker.









0 pts


Needs Improvement

Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • key responsibilities of the interviewee are summarized on the template with an emphasis on describing the NI or Technology specialist • sources of data used to support quality improvement • theoretical framework and model utilized degree to which the interviewee functions as a member of an interdisciplinary/inter-professional team as an MSN level leader and decision-maker.








/ 60 pts



Reflection









50 pts


Distinguished

Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • Includes the student’s unique insights about what was learned from completing this assignment • how it can be used in practice. • Uses scholarly, evidence-based resources to support content and opinions.









47 pts


Exceeds

Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • Includes the student’s unique insights about what was learned from completing this assignment • how it can be used in practice. • Uses scholarly, evidence-based resources to support content and opinions.









42 pts


Proficient

Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: • Includes the student’s unique insights about what was learned from completing this assignment • how it can be used in practice. • Uses scholarly, evidence-based resources to support content and opinions.









0 pts


Needs Improvement

Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • Includes the student’s unique insights about what was learned from completing this assignment • how it can be used in practice. • Uses scholarly, evidence-based resources to support content and opinions.








/ 50 pts



Conclusion









30 pts


Distinguished

Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • Overview of introduction of interviewee • Detailed overview of interview highlights from each question. • Overview of reflection









28 pts


Exceeds

Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • Overview of introduction of interviewee • Detailed overview of interview highlights from each question. • Overview of reflection









26 pts


Proficient

Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:• Overview of introduction of interviewee • Detailed overview of interview highlights from each question. • Overview of reflection









0 pts


Needs Improvement

Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:• Overview of introduction of interviewee • Detailed overview of interview highlights from each question. • Overview of reflection








/ 30 pts



Template Completion









15 pts


Distinguished

Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:• Completion of introduction • All template questions answered • Completion of reflection with scholarly source • Completion of conclusion









14 pts


Exceeds

Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:• Completion of introduction • All template questions answered • Completion of reflection with scholarly source • Completion of conclusion









13 pts


Proficient

Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:• Completion of introduction • All template questions answered • Completion of reflection with scholarly source • Completion of conclusion









0 pts


Needs Improvement

Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:• Completion of introduction • All template questions answered • Completion of reflection with scholarly source • Completion of conclusion








/ 15 pts



Professional Level Writing Style









15 pts


Distinguished

Distinguished professional-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Cited/referenced according to APA









14 pts


Exceeds

Professional-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-4 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Cited/referenced according to APA









13 pts


Proficient

Proficient professional-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Cited/referenced according to APA









0 pts


Needs Improvement

Professional-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8 or more errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Cited/referenced according to APA








/ 15 pts



Quality of Literature Support









0 pts


0 Points Deducted

A minimum of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within five years, are integrated within the assignment.









0 pts


5 Points Deducted

The assignment fails to meet the requirement noted for quality of literature support.








/ 0 pts






Answered 1 days After Feb 24, 2024

Solution

Shubham answered on Feb 26 2024
9 Votes
Introduction
The study explores providing insights gained from interviewing informatics nurse specialist. It includes considering background, role, challenges and transformative impact of technology in healthcare.
Interview Results
It includes taking interview of highly experienced informatics nurse specialist. The interviewee holds degree of master in nursing informatics and has been working in field for over 15 years. The educational background includes degree in nursing. The informatics nurse specialist shared that interest in field stemmed from desire to
idge gap between healthcare and technology. The technology helps to enhance patient care, streamline processes and improve overall healthcare outcomes. It describes importance of informatics and technology in healthcare and interviewee highlighted role in enhancing efficiency, reducing e
ors and ensuring evidence-based practice (Strudwick et al. 2019). Three key responsibilities include role as informatics nurse specialist that includes implementing and optimizing health information systems, ensuring data integrity and security and facilitating communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals through technology.
The data collection methods in the organization and interviewee mentions combination of electronic health records, surveys and clinical data repositories. It can help in...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here