Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Microsoft Word - FIT3174 S1 2020 Assignment 2 Page 1 of 3 FIT3174 IT STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE Semester 1, 2020 Assignment 2: Evaluating IT Systems Failure: A Case Study Value: This assignment is worth...

1 answer below »
Microsoft Word - FIT3174 S1 2020 Assignment 2
Page 1 of 3

FIT3174 IT STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE

Semester 1, 2020

Assignment 2: Evaluating IT Systems Failure: A Case Study

Value: This assignment is worth 10% of your final assessment in the unit.
Type of Assignment: Individual
Submission Date: Friday, Week 11 (5th June 2020), 11:55 pm
Submission of the Assignments: You are required to submit your assignment to
Moodle/Turnitin. The file names should contain Unit Code, assignment number and your
student ID number, similar to the following example:
FIT3174A2_StudentID.docx OR FIT3174A2_StudentID.pdf

Learning outcomes:
Demonstrate the understanding of IT governance, and how IT projects can be
successfully completed with appropriate attention to IT critical success factors,
implementation issues and IT governance. Discuss the applications of the well-known IT
governance frameworks commonly used in organisations, such as ITIL/COBIT.
Broad Assignment Aims
Students are presented with a case study to:
(a) critically review the need for the organisation to implement an IT governance
framework,
(b) critically evaluate the implementation experience of these organisations by drawing
on the theoretical constructs involved in IT governance frameworks like COBIT,
(c) how its chosen IT governance framework affects that strategy.
Students are required to derive the strategic motivations, ba
iers, impact, and lessons of
the case organisation in implementing IT governance frameworks like COBIT, relating
them to the IT governance scholarly literature.
Report Outline:
A recommended report outline is as follows:
 Title page (with assignment title, student name, ID, unit code, tutors name)
 Table of contents
 Executive summary or Abstract
 Introduction section, e.g. purpose, scope
 Body (responses to the assignment tasks)
o a critical review of the case study
o evaluate the applications of IT governance frameworks
 Conclusion
 One single aggregated reference list at the end of the document.
Page 2 of 3

Writing style:
 Use an IT
usiness report genre (https:
www.monash.edu
lo/quick-study-
guides/features-of-reports).
 Font - Times New Roman font, size 12, and single space.
 Paging - each page (except the title page, table of contents) must be numbered.
 Write in a neutral voice.
 Writing clear sentences and paragraphing, for examples:
o Writing clear paragraphs: https:
www.monash.edu
lo
esearch-writing-
assignments/writing/clear-communication/writing-clear-paragraphs
o IT report: approaching the task: https:
www.monash.edu
lo/assignment-
samples/information-technology/approaching-the-task
o Writing style attributes: https:
www.monash.edu/it/cu
ent-
students
esources-and-support/style-guide
References:
Students are encouraged to search for relevant extra readings and draw on suitable
literature from academic publications as well as practitioner outlets. All sources of
information must be fully and appropriately acknowledged using in-text citation and
eference list. The reference section should use the American Psychological Association
(APA) style of referencing (https:
guides.lib.monash.edu/citing-referencing/apa).
Late Submissions: Late submissions will be penalised as stated in the unit guide.
Other Questions: Please contact your tutor or lecturer should you require further
clarifications.
Assignment Assessment Criteria:
Your submission will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:
 Depth of analysis
 Completeness and co
ectness of arguments
 Richness of arguments
 Clarity of expression
 Use of appropriate references to support arguments
Specific Instructions
Students are provided with an initial resource for the assessment which is available in
Moodle, under Assessments→Assignment 2: Instructions, Resources and Submission.
Read the following article:
“The Largest Admitted IT Project Failure in the Southern Hemisphere: A Teaching
Case” by Rebekah Eden and Darshana Sedera. Students also are encouraged to read
elated academic and practitioner material on the case study.
Drawing on the reading of the article and based on the understanding developed through
this unit (FIT3174), prepare a report addressing the assignment tasks.
Page 3 of 3

You are required to seek additional material from a variety of sources. You must specify
any sources used in the submission using appropriate referencing styles. You are required
to find information beyond the resources provided below. However, you are not required
to contact the organisation for information. You may make reasonable assumptions and
state them in the report.
Task 1 (34 marks)
Discuss how IT projects can be successfully completed with appropriate attention to IT
critical success factors, implementation issues, and IT governance.
 List and discuss at least three implementation issues that can be observed in the
Queensland Health’s payroll system failure XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
 Discuss how this project can be a successful one with appropriate attention to IT
critical success factors. Include at least three critical success factors. You must
justify your answers using evidence from the case study or web resources.
(12 marks)
 Discuss the need for ‘Good Governance’ in this project. (10 marks)
 Suggested length: 2-3 pages
Task 2 (36 marks)
Provide an overview of how Queensland Health payroll system project failure could have
een minimised (or avoided) using the COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and
Related Technologies) five principles and enablers. Your responses should include at
least two principles and two enablers. Your discussion should demonstrate clear links
etween principles and enablers.
Suggested length: 2-3 pages
Task 3 (20 marks)
Search for another well-known IT governance framework that is commonly used in
organisations and discuss the advantages of the framework, e.g. to overcome issues,
challenges, areas, etc., that are not addressed by COBIT.
Explain with examples to justify the applications of the framework in Queensland
Health’s payroll project.
Suggested length: 1-2 pages
References (5 marks)
Include at least five references and cite them in the body of your assignment report and
add full references in the bibliography (use APA6 style).

Overall presentation (5 marks)

(The End)

Microsoft Word - FIT3174 S1 2020 Assignment 2
Page 1 of 3

FIT3174 IT STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE

Semester 1, 2020

Assignment 2: Evaluating IT Systems Failure: A Case Study

Value: This assignment is worth 10% of your final assessment in the unit.
Type of Assignment: Individual
Submission Date: Friday, Week 11 (5th June 2020), 11:55 pm
Submission of the Assignments: You are required to submit your assignment to
Moodle/Turnitin. The file names should contain Unit Code, assignment number and your
student ID number, similar to the following example:
FIT3174A2_StudentID.docx OR FIT3174A2_StudentID.pdf

Learning outcomes:
Demonstrate the understanding of IT governance, and how IT projects can be
successfully completed with appropriate attention to IT critical success factors,
implementation issues and IT governance. Discuss the applications of the well-known IT
governance frameworks commonly used in organisations, such as ITIL/COBIT.
Broad Assignment Aims
Students are presented with a case study to:
(a) critically review the need for the organisation to implement an IT governance
framework,
(b) critically evaluate the implementation experience of these organisations by drawing
on the theoretical constructs involved in IT governance frameworks like COBIT,
(c) how its chosen IT governance framework affects that strategy.
Students are required to derive the strategic motivations, ba
iers, impact, and lessons of
the case organisation in implementing IT governance frameworks like COBIT, relating
them to the IT governance scholarly literature.
Report Outline:
A recommended report outline is as follows:
 Title page (with assignment title, student name, ID, unit code, tutors name)
 Table of contents
 Executive summary or Abstract
 Introduction section, e.g. purpose, scope
 Body (responses to the assignment tasks)
o a critical review of the case study
o evaluate the applications of IT governance frameworks
 Conclusion
 One single aggregated reference list at the end of the document.
Page 2 of 3

Writing style:
 Use an IT
usiness report genre (https:
www.monash.edu
lo/quick-study-
guides/features-of-reports).
 Font - Times New Roman font, size 12, and single space.
 Paging - each page (except the title page, table of contents) must be numbered.
 Write in a neutral voice.
 Writing clear sentences and paragraphing, for examples:
o Writing clear paragraphs: https:
www.monash.edu
lo
esearch-writing-
assignments/writing/clear-communication/writing-clear-paragraphs
o IT report: approaching the task: https:
www.monash.edu
lo/assignment-
samples/information-technology/approaching-the-task
o Writing style attributes: https:
www.monash.edu/it/cu
ent-
students
esources-and-support/style-guide
References:
Students are encouraged to search for relevant extra readings and draw on suitable
literature from academic publications as well as practitioner outlets. All sources of
information must be fully and appropriately acknowledged using in-text citation and
eference list. The reference section should use the American Psychological Association
(APA) style of referencing (https:
guides.lib.monash.edu/citing-referencing/apa).
Late Submissions: Late submissions will be penalised as stated in the unit guide.
Other Questions: Please contact your tutor or lecturer should you require further
clarifications.
Assignment Assessment Criteria:
Your submission will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:
 Depth of analysis
 Completeness and co
ectness of arguments
 Richness of arguments
 Clarity of expression
 Use of appropriate references to support arguments
Specific Instructions
Students are provided with an initial resource for the assessment which is available in
Moodle, under Assessments→Assignment 2: Instructions, Resources and Submission.
Read the following article:
“The Largest Admitted IT Project Failure in the Southern Hemisphere: A Teaching
Case” by Rebekah Eden and Darshana Sedera. Students also are encouraged to read
elated academic and practitioner material on the case study.
Drawing on the reading of the article and based on the understanding developed through
this unit (FIT3174), prepare a report addressing the assignment tasks.
Page 3 of 3

You are required to seek additional material from a variety of sources. You must specify
any sources used in the submission using appropriate referencing styles. You are required
to find information beyond the resources provided below. However, you are not required
to contact the organisation for information. You may make reasonable assumptions and
state them in the report.
Task 1 (34 marks)
Discuss how IT projects can be successfully completed with appropriate attention to IT
critical success factors, implementation issues, and IT governance.
 List and discuss at least three implementation issues that can be observed in the
Queensland Health’s payroll system failure XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
 Discuss how this project can be a successful one with appropriate attention
Answered Same Day Jun 04, 2021 FIT3174 Monash University

Solution

Deepti answered on Jun 11 2021
160 Votes
Review Report
Executive Summary
This report focuses on details about the implementation failures witnessed in the Queensland Health case study. The three of the major implementation failures have been discussed in detail including requirement specifications, implementation strategy and governance complexity. The critical factors which could improve the IT payroll system implementation for the case study are further discussed. The report highlights the importance of the IT governance framework for large scale organization when such transition from legacy system to a new IT system is undertaken. Furthermore, COBIT Framework is discussed and the report elaborates two principles and two enablers of the framework about how it can be helpful in enhancing the implementation of IT payroll system for Queensland Health. Lastly, an alternative IT governance framework is discussed which may be used for the case study.
Contents
Executive Summary    1
Introduction    3
Implementation Failures    3
Requirement Specification    4
Implementation Strategy    4
Project Governance Complexity    5
IT Critical Success Factors    5
Efficiency and effectiveness    6
Change Management    7
Governance    7
Requirement of IT Governance    8
COBIT Framework for Queensland Health    9
Principle- Meeting stakeholders needs    9
Principle - Applying a single integrated framework    10
Enabler- Principles, Policies and Frameworks    10
Enabler- People, Skills and Competencies    10
Alternative IT Governance Framework: ISO 20000    11
Conclusion    12
References    13
Introduction
The report discusses in detail the payroll system implementation disaster at Queensland Health which proved to be the largest IT project failure of Southern hemisphere. Queensland Health is a healthcare provider for Australian state of Queensland. This public sector organization saw excellent growth in offering health related services to citizens and the legacy system became obsolete and could no longer be supportive, thus requiring it to transition from its legacy LATTICE system to new IT payroll system. Therefore, the shared service initiative concluded to replace the existing system with SAP ECCS and Work
ain with CorpTech assigned to oversee the standardized implementation across all departments of Queensland.
This report highlights the implementation failures, the critical factors which could contribute to the success of the IT payroll implementation project, need of IT governance framework for such case, COBIT Framework and one alternative framework for the case in the following sections.
Implementation Failures
Implementation failure is a disaster for the organization as it directly affects the employees. Out of numerous procedural challenges, the organization may face potential issues and risks while implementing payroll system. Payroll process may generate issues which can turn into big problems and lead to major project failure if not addressed in time and with expertise. Such a failure causes missed pay deadlines, dissatisfied employees and reputational damage with financial penalties. In this case, it proved to be a major set-back to the state. Various reasons of such failure include not defining the objectives of the project clearly in its initial stage, lack of planning and project governance, over-reliance on the software solution, insufficient training and support to the staff, miscommunication among the team members, acceptance issue or resistance from the employees for accepting change, not planning the change management and handling out-of-scope problems, lack of careful transition from obsolete legacy system to new system, improper testing of each of the implementation stages of SDLC, not defining requirements of the system clearly, unwise selection of implementation strategy in accordance with the size of the target organization, wrong assessment of complexity of the project, etc. The last three factors are discussed in detail in this section.
Requirement Specification
Payroll management is a crucial function for any organization. An automated software streamlines the processes associated with the compensation for accurate and quick action. It is very important to specify requirements of the business with complete details about functional areas, opportunities and problems related to adopting the new system. The requirement specifications when clearly articulated, ensure that the new system works as intended and shows the scope of implementation too. In case of Queensland Health, the requirement specifications were not outlined appropriately. The issues of functionality and user acceptance surfaced during testing phase which should have been discussed and eliminated during initial phase of implementation, i.e. while setting the requirements. The solution to those issue inflated the costs since the issues were viewed as new requirements of the system as they were not included in the project scope. The communication gaps among the implementation team members were evident as they failed to communicate the requirements clearly. The parties did not have precise understanding of the deliverables and the tasks required to accomplish the objectives. The state went ahead with a prime contractor for its IT payroll system implementation without ensuring that all the requirements and specifications were precisely defined. The stakeholders were in continuous discussions about accepting and rejecting certain functions at a later stage of implementation due to lack of proper requirement specifications. This benefitted the prime contractor who varied the scope of project following every debate on requirements thus claiming variance and inflating the overall cost of the project.
Implementation Strategy
Implementation strategy used in implementing the IT payroll system at Queensland Health was based on a solution which had dealt with fewer complexities as compared to Queensland Health. It further lacked engagement of prime contractor consultant as well as utilization of WorkBrain which were both part of the implementation of the new system. Moreover, the legacy system of LATTICE was no longer supported by the third parties and the succession plan for the old system was useless. WorkBrain instigated additional complexities which were not anticipated beforehand. This WorkBrain feature offered to process timesheets into acceptable format using SAP so that payments could be made by the financial institutions. But the lack of appropriate interface between the feature and SAP led to payroll becoming a time-consuming process. Multiple interfaces would increase the complexity of the system and require more training for the employees for system upgrade and maintenance. Inclusion of this feature in implementation strategy without prior testing to ensure whether it can handle such a large scale organization proved to be detrimental for the project. A progressive methodology was required in the project in order to substantiate the feature offered by the prime contractor as a rostering solution. The complexity of the implementation was increased by implementing the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here