MHS8.436: Health and healthcare in the context of Aoteaora New Zealand
Assessment Two (Sem 2 2018)
Assessment topic
New Zealand Health System
Assessment type
Critical Essay
Word restriction
XXXXXXXXXXwords (excluding references)
Submission details
24th Nov 2018, 4pm
Note: Submission will only be accepted via EIT online. Your assignment will be checked for plagiarism, which will be considered as academic misconduct.
Weighting
45 % of overall course grade
Assessment last reviewed
May 2018
Course learning outcomes covered
LO 3) Consider the implications of Te Tiriti o Waitangi for the health strategies underpinning Aotearoa New Zealand's health system.
LO 4) Interpret the roles and influence of families and whanau in the context of health and wellbeing, as related to the study of epidemiology in the Aotearoa New Zealand population.
Background to this assessment
This is the second assessment in the MHS 8.436 Health and Healthcare in the Context of Aoteaora New Zealand. The focus is on the Health Strategies that set the overarching framework to guide the Government and the health and disability sector to achieve the best outcomes for Māori. The Health and disability services in New Zealand are delivered by a complex network of organizations and people. Each has their role in working with others across the system to achieve better health for New Zealanders. Te Tiriti O Waitangi is strongly associated with perspectives on health and well-being at several levels. Therefore, the relationship of te Tiriti and its articles with health, Mäori concepts of health strategies, and health promotion is also considered.
Remember to consider the feedback you received from any previous assessments, forum discussions or formative assessments when completing this assessment.
Assessment task 1
Task 1: Critically examine the strategies, guidelines or acts that guide the Government and the health and disability sector to achieve the best health outcomes for Māori. Also, critically discuss any implications of Te Tiriti o Waitangi on these strategies, guidelines or acts.
Guidelines: Please spend some time to carefully read all of the information provided in this document and in the assessment marking criteria below.
Provide appropriate sub-headings, concise introductions and conclusions and APA references to the essay.
It is suggested that you undertake a critical analysis of the Maori health strategy that supports the Ministry of Health and district health boards (DHBs) to improve Māori health by addressing the various strategies, acts or guidelines. Also consider if the relationship between the Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Māori health strategy, is an effective partnership, when you examine the implications of Te Tiriti o Waitangi on these strategies, guidelines or acts.
In this task, you are required mainly to show your ability of your foundation of knowledge your ability to synthesise knowledge, your application of knowledge and academic scholarship in accordance with the assessment marking criteria below.
Be sure to consider the assessment marking criteria overleaf.
Academic scholarship will be marked out of 20 for this assessment.
ASSESSMENT MARKING CRITERIA – MHS8.436 Health and healthcare in the context of Aoteaora New Zealand.
Student name: Marker name: Date:
Student number: Cross-marker name: Date:
OVERALL GRADE:
Evaluative Criterion
Description per Grade Range
A grade (> 80%)
B grade (65% - 79.9%)
C grade (50% - 64.9%)
Fail (<50%)
Foundations of knowledge
Demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter.
Excels in explaining all major points.
Demonstrates a good level of knowledge of subject matter with only some minor gaps in knowledge-base.
Explains most of the major points clearly.
Demonstrates a general, fundamental understanding of the subject matter but with some obvious gaps in the knowledge base.
Has attempted to explain major points but not always successful at doing so clearly.
Demonstrates little or no understanding of the subject matter.
Has not explained the major points clearly.
Comments
Synthesis of knowledge
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assessment requirements.
Provides a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of details, facts and concepts.
Demonstrates a high level of competency in critiquing the information presented.
Demonstrates a generally good level of understanding of the assessment requirements.
Provides a moderate level of analysis of details, facts and concepts.
Demonstrates a moderate level of ability in critiquing the information presented.
Demonstrates some understanding of the assessment requirements but has not fully understood them.
Provides some analysis of details, facts and concepts.
Demonstrates some ability in critiquing the information presented.
Demonstrates little or no understanding of the assessment requirements.
Provides no or little evidence of analysis of details, facts and concepts.
Demonstrates very poor or no critiquing of the information presented.
Comments
Application of knowledge
Consistently shows an excellent ability to apply knowledge to the assessment topic and/or work environment.
Consistently integrates the literature as a foundation for well-reasoned argumentation.
Generally shows an ability to apply their knowledge to the assessment topic and/or work environment.
Generally integrates the literature and as a foundation for argumentation.
Some application of their knowledge to the assessment topic and/or work environment.
Some integration of the literature.
Very little or no application of their knowledge to the assessment topic and/or work environment.
Very few or no links made between the literature and the assessment topic and/or their work environment.
Comments
Academic scholarship
Uses a wide variety of relevant and up-to-date sources of information, primarily from peer-reviewed literature.
Presents information in a logical sequence.
Excellent writing skills and co
ect grammar.
Sources of information are accurately presented in both the body text and reference list (APA 6th style).
Uses a range of relevant sources of information but not always the latest literature and/or peer-reviewed literature.
Presents most of the information in a logical sequence.
Some minor issues with writing skills and grammar.
Some minor e
ors in presentation of information sources in the body text and/or reference list.
Uses some relevant literature but shows limited use of the latest literature and/or peer-reviewed literature.
Presents some of the in a logical sequence.
Writing difficult to follow in places and numerous minor grammatical e
ors throughout.
Numerous minor e
ors in presentation of information sources in the body text and/or reference list.
Uses very little or no relevant literature and/or very little peer-reviewed literature and/or uses out-dated literature.
Little or no logical flow in presentation of information.
Poor formulation throughout and numerous grammatical e
ors.
Very poor presentation of information sources in the body text and reference list.
Comments
Grade per task
Overall Feedback