Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd
CRICOS Provider No: 01545C, 03245K NSW
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Course Name:
MPA
Unit Code:
MA619
Unit Title:
Accounting Research
Assessment Type:
Individual Assignment
Assessment Title:
Literature Review
Weight:
30 percent
Total Marks:
30 marks
Word limit
3,000
Release Date:
19th March, 2019
Due Date:
26th April, XXXXXXXXXX00pm
Submission Guidelines:
(Literature Review)
· This is an individual assignment.
· All work must be submitted via Turnitin by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.
· The assignment must be in Ms Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Cali
i (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.
· Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using APA referencing style.
Extension
· If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at:
http:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Assignment Cover Sheet
Student ID Numbe
Student Surname
Given name
Course:
School:
Unit code:
Unit title:
Due date:
Date submitted:
Campus:
Lecturer:
Tutor:
All work must be submitted via Turnitin by the due date. If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted. Further information is available at:
http:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.
Student Declaration
I declare that:
· the work contained in this assignment is my/our own work/group work, except where acknowledgement of sources is made;
· certify that this assessment has not been submitted previously for academic credit in this or any other course;
· I/we have read the MIT’s Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct Policy Procedure, and I/we understand the consequences of engaging in plagiarism;
· a copy of the original assignment is retained by me/us and that I/we may be required to submit the original assignment to the Lecturer and/or Unit Co-ordinator upon request;
I/we have not plagiarised the work of others or participated in unauthorised collaboration when preparing this assignment.
Student Signature:
Date:
Marking Ru
ic-Literature Review (Minor Assignment)(30%)
Part 1
(10 Marks)
Part 2
(10 marks)
Part 3
(10 marks)
Met requirements to an excellent level
(80 to 100%)
Met requirements to a very good level
(70 to 79%)
Met requirements to a good level
(60 to 69%)
Met requirements to a satisfactory level
(50 to 59%)
Did not met requirements
(0 to 49%)
TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL (out of 30)
Marks will be awarded as follows:
· (Part 1) 10 marks for Excellent expression, punctuation, grammar and editing;
· (Part XXXXXXXXXXmarks for a comprehensive and relevant bibliography presented; and
· (Part 3) 10 marks for the synthesis evident and for the identification of a researchable topic.
Assignment:
MA619 Accounting Research
Minor Assignment – Literature Review (30%)
Requirements
As this is a research unit, and the objective is that you can ca
y out a research project in Accounting, Finance or Business. You may choose a research topic or you will be given a research topic by your Lecturer. You will choose your research topic no later than week 3 of your course. DO NOT COMMENCE YOUR LITERATURE REVIEW WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM YOUR LECTURER
It is essential that you decide promptly your area of research interest which can be in ANY of the fields of Accounting, Finance or Business. You have only 12 weeks to complete this course!
Your Minor Assignment (30%) will be a Literature Review for your Research Report. (70%)
Once you have chosen your topic or been allocated a topic, you are required to find at least 20 relevant research articles. You may need more. The aim is for you to write a Literature Review (Minor Assignment) using the literature discovered.
A Literature Review of the 20 articles (use more if you wish), presents what has been written in the past and will inform your research question which will be solved in your Research Report (Major Assignment)(70%) due at the end of Week 12
XXXXXXXXXXNote: It is strongly recommended you read carefully Chennhall/ Langfield-Smith XXXXXXXXXXand George/Jones/Harvey XXXXXXXXXXfor ideas of how to write a scholarly piece reviewing what has happened in the past and what conclusions can be drawn from previous work.
Extract from Langfield-Smith (2007)
Objective
The objective of this paper is to review the research from various disciplines which examines performance measures, and to evaluate the state of knowledge in this area.
Purpose
The purpose of this paper was to review and critique research that examines performance measures used by various disciplines including Management Accounting
Future research
Analysis of research which examines the use of subjective and objective performance measures under different strategies revealed consistencies, but also raised questions about the forms of performance measures suitable for other employee groups. Empirical research to explore how performance measures and reward systems may be used under particular operational strategies, and to support new manufacturing philosophies is a
oad topic for research.
Both of these articles are available on Moodle
Professor Geoffrey George,
12th November , 2018
1
[MA619 Accounting Research] Page 4 of 4
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
MA619 Accounting Research
School
Business
Course Name
Master of Professional Accounting
Unit Code
MA619
Unit Title
Accounting Research
Trimeste
3/2018
Assessment Autho
Professor Geoffrey George
Assessment Type
Report [Individual]
Assessment Title
Research Report
Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed:
c. Demonstrate cognitive, technical and creative skills to investigate, analyse and synthesise complex information, problems, concepts and theories in the accounting discipline.
d. Assess methodologies and choose an appropriate methodology for an identified research problem.
e. Plan, execute, prepare and present, a substantive research report communicating research findings.
Weight
70%
Total Marks
70
Word limit
XXXXXXXXXX
Release Date
19th March 2019
Due Date
Week 12, Friday 7th June, XXXXXXXXXX00pm
Submission Guidelines
· All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.
· The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Cali
i (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.
· Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using APA 6th edition for the School of Business.
Extension
If an extension of time to submit work is required, an Application for Special Consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer via your MIT AMS login
[https:
online.mit.edu.au/ams/default.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fams%2f]. You must submit this application no later than three working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination for which you are seeking Special Consideration. Further information is available at:
http:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.
Assessment Task Description
This Report [Individual] accounts for 70% of the final assessment in this Unit and is worth 70 marks.
Your Research Report will have the following Parts:
· Cover Sheet, with your Report Details and your personal information
· Abstract, say 300 words (no more) (See GJH for a sample)
· Introduction, which introduces your topic, provides a
ief summary of your literature, re-states your research question(s) and describes how you propose to answer the research questions.
· Literature Review (include the Research Report [already finished] after your Introduction)
· Research Question, stated and explained
· Methodology, to be used in your research and Report
· Data Analysis: data analysed to answer the research questions
· Conclusions: drawn from your data/information analysed noting any limitations of your data/analysis
· Bibliography: as for your Literature Review BUT including ANY ADDITIONAL references used in the Research Report.
· Appendix: where you have constructed tables, graphs, or extracts from secondary sources, number each item and include in your appendix. (You may choose to use such items in the body of your Report when such are few)
Be careful to review and respond to all matters of English expression
Professor Geoffrey George
30th October, 2018
Marking criteria:
Marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows:
Detailed Description of the Criteria
Marks
Criteria 1
Abstract is comprehensive and concise
10
Criteria 2
Introduction is comprehensive and effective
10
Criteria 3
Research question is clearly stated and explained;
· Exposition of the research problem to be investigated
10
Criteria 4
Methodology is appropriate and clearly explained;
· Conduct of the investigation including choice of appropriate methodology
10
Criteria 5
Data is analysed appropriately and reported;
· Analysis of the research data (information)
10
Criteria 6
Conclusions/inferences from analysis are clearly explained;
· Conclusions drawn from the research conducted
10
Criteria 7
Excellence in writing and presentation demonstrated;
· Writing, expression and presentation
10
Total
70
Marking Ru
ic: Total Marks 70
Marking Ru
ic Criteria/ Grades
High Distinction (HD) [Excellent]
= or >80%
Distinction (D) [Very Good]
70%-79%
Credits
(C) [Good]
60%-69%
Pass (P) [Satisfactory]
50%-59%
Fail (N) [Unsatisfactory]
50%
Criteria 1
Abstract is comprehensive and concise
Abstract mostly comprehensive and concise
Abstract easily meets requirements
Abstract acceptable
Abstract not of acceptable standard
Criteria 2
Introduction comprehensive and effective
Introduction mostly comprehensive and effective
Introduction meets requirements
Introduction acceptable
Introduction NOT acceptable
Criteria 3
Research question clearly stated and explained
Research question mostly explained and stated
Research question adequately stated and explained
Research question acceptable
Research question not clearly stated and explained
Criteria 4
Methodology appropriate and explained
Methodology well explained
Methodology explained
Methodology acceptable
Unacceptable methodology
Criteria 5
Data analysed and reported
Data analysis very good
Data analysis good
Data analysis adequate
Data analysis not adequate
Criteria 6