Imagine that you are discuss with you teacher PLEASE DO NOT WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT AS AN ESSAY.. JUST WRITE LIKE YOU DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEACHER Need about 400 words per bellow requirements and using...

Imagine that you are discuss with you teache
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT AS AN ESSAY.. JUST WRITE LIKE YOU DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEACHER
Need about 400 words per bellow requirements and using articles attached in needed
Dear expert you have wrote assignment attached and my teacher made comments bellow please read teacher comments bellow and do the following :-
1- Make a deep discussion with this essay ?
2- Provide example?
3- Give suggestions?
4- You should therefore be offering new ideas in response?
You must Read the book,WEBSITES and ALL articles, to answer the above questions and you MUST include them in references list and based on them to write this assignment .
Dear expert
You MUST use the following references and you MUST include them in in references list
· 1- Chapter 12 (p XXXXXXXXXXof Baldock, J., Manning, N., and Vickerstaff, S. (eds XXXXXXXXXXSocial Policy (4th edition). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
· 2- Chapter 9 of Webster, C XXXXXXXXXXCaring for Health (3rd edition), Milton Keynes, OUP. [this book was the key text for module 4 Management of health systems]
·
· 3- Commonwealth Fund XXXXXXXXXXMi
or, Mi
or on the Wall: An International Update on the Comparative Performance of American Health Care http:
www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=482678
·
· 4- Bam
a, C XXXXXXXXXXCash versus services: 'worlds of welfare' and the decommodification of cash benefits and health care services, Journal of Social Policy 34: XXXXXXXXXX.
·
· 5- Chapters 2 and 3 of Twaddle, A XXXXXXXXXXHealth care reform efforts around the world. New York, Greenwood publishing. E-book:
·
· 6- Wendt, C : ' Mapping European healthcare systems: a comparative analysis of financing, service provision and access to healthcare' : Journal of European Social Policy, December 2009 vol. 19 no XXXXXXXXXX
Teacher comments and questions
You conclude that "Having considered the three health systems, national health systems are the fairest way of providing healthcare in as much as it gives universal access to all citizens, free at the point of use, ensures that the poor and physically challenged are covered even when with minimal contributions (Baldock et. al, 2012)".
Pannarunothai & Srithamrongsawat (nd) note that the Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform were developed by Daniels, et al XXXXXXXXXXas a tool to evaluate medical insurance reform proposals in the United States around the time of the presidential election in 1992.
The original conception of a fair health care system was based on the ethical issues of universal access to comprehensive and equal benefits with fair financial burdens and a workable, efficient, and accountable system.
Benchmark 1: Universal access
- Coverage and Participation
Benchmark 2: Universal access
- Minimizing Nonfinancial Ba
iers
Benchmark 3: Comprehensive and Uniform Benefits
Benchmark 4: Equitable Financing
- Community-Rated Contributions
Benchmark 5: Equitable Financing
- By Ability to Pay
Benchmark 6: Value for Money
- Clinical Efficacy
Benchmark 7: Value for Money
- Financial Efficiency
Benchmark 8: Public Accountability
Benchmark 9: Comparability
Benchmark 10: Degree of Consumer Choice
What then are the potential uses of these benchmarks as an analytical framework for health development, especially fair health systems, and equally for the formulation of appropriate social policies?
MY REQUIREMENTS:-
PLEASE READ ARTICLES ATTACHED BEFORE START WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT.
Need about 4 references
1- PLEASE WRITE THIS ASSIGNMET ON DEPTH (GENERAL WRITING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE).
2- Referencing (in text citation) should be evident in the discussions.
3- You MUST use author name and page number on essay while writing. Like this (Kaplan,2006 p.24). should be evident in the discussions.
4- Please you should choose examples from your own experience or find appropriate cases on the Web that you can discuss.
5- Please use Harvard style.
6- Referencing (in text citation) should be evident in the discussions.
MUST IMPORTANT NOTE
Your writing should not submitted before to any others colleges.

Imagine that y
ou are discuss with you teache

PLEASE
DO NOT

WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT AS AN ESSAY..
JUST WRITE LIKE YOU DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEACHER

Need about
400

words per bellow requirements
and using articles
attached
in needed
Dear expert

you have wrote assignment attached and my teacher
made comments

ellow
please read
teacher comments
ellow
and do the following

:
-

1
-

Make a deep discussion with this essay ?

2
-

Provide example?

3
-

Give suggestions?

4
-

You should therefore be
offering new ideas in response?

You must
Read the
ook
,WEBSITES and ALL articles
,
to answer the above

questions and you
MUST

include
them

in
eferences list
and based on

them
to write this
assignment
.

Dear expert
You MUST use the following references and you MUST
include them in in references list
1
-

Chapter 12 (p 269
-
282) of Baldock, J., Manning, N., and
Vickerstaff, S. (eds XXXXXXXXXXSocial Policy (
4th edition
). Oxford,
Oxford University Press.
2
-

Chapter 9 of We
ster, C XXXXXXXXXXCaring for Health (3
d

edition),
Milton Keynes, OUP. [
this

ook was the key text for module 4
Management of health systems]
3
-

Commonwealth Fund XXXXXXXXXXMi
or, Mi
or on the Wall: An
International Update on the Comparative Performance of
American
Health Care

Imagine that you are discuss with you teacher
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT AS AN ESSAY..
JUST WRITE LIKE YOU DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEACHER
Need about 400 words per bellow requirements and using articles
attached in needed
Dear expert you have wrote assignment attached and my teacher
made comments bellow please read teacher comments bellow
and do the following :-
1- Make a deep discussion with this essay ?
2- Provide example?
3- Give suggestions?
4- You should therefore be offering new ideas in response?
You must Read the book,WEBSITES and ALL articles,
to answer the above questions and you MUST include
them in references list and based on them to write this
assignment .
Dear expert
You MUST use the following references and you MUST
include them in in references list
1- Chapter 12 (p XXXXXXXXXXof Baldock, J., Manning, N., and
Vickerstaff, S. (eds XXXXXXXXXXSocial Policy (4th edition). Oxford,
Oxford University Press.
2- Chapter 9 of Webster, C XXXXXXXXXXCaring for Health (3
d
edition),
Milton Keynes, OUP. [this book was the key text for module 4
Management of health systems]

3- Commonwealth Fund XXXXXXXXXXMi
or, Mi
or on the Wall: An
International Update on the Comparative Performance of American
Health Care

title
Journal of Social Policy
http:
journals.cam
idge.org/JSP
Additional services for Journal of Social Policy:
Email alerts: Click here
Subscriptions: Click here
Commercial reprints: Click here
Terms of use : Click here
Cash Versus Services: ‘Worlds of Welfare’ and 
the Decommodification of Cash Benefits and 
Health Care Services
CLARE BAMBRA
Journal of Social Policy / Volume 34 / Issue 02 / April 2005, pp 195 ­ 213
DOI: 10.1017/S XXXXXXXXXX, Published online: 15 March 2005
Link to this article: http:
journals.cam
idge.org/abstract_S XXXXXXXXXX
How to cite this article:
CLARE BAMBRA (2005). Cash Versus Services: ‘Worlds of Welfare’ and the 
Decommodification of Cash Benefits and Health Care Services. Journal of Social 
Policy, 34, pp 195­213 doi:10.1017/S XXXXXXXXXX
Request Permissions : Click here
Downloaded from http:
journals.cam
idge.org/JSP, IP address:  XXXXXXXXXX on 10 Jul 2013
http:
journals.cam
idge.org Downloaded: 10 Jul 2013 IP address: XXXXXXXXXX
Jnl Soc. Pol., 34, 2, 195–213 C© 2005 Cam
idge University Press
doi:10.1017/S XXXXXXXXXXPrinted in the United Kingdom
Cash Versus Services: ‘Worlds of Welfare’
and the Decommodification of Cash
Benefits and Health Care Services
CLARE BAMBRA
Social Policy and Sociology, Collegiate Crescent Campus, Sheffield Hallam University,
Sheffield S10 2BP
email: c.bam
XXXXXXXXXX
Abstract
Welfare state models have focused almost exclusively on the study of cash benefits, and
typologies established on this limited basis have been used to generalise about all forms of
welfare state provision. This ignores the fact that welfare states are also about the actual delivery
of services and/or that countries vary in terms of the relative emphasis that they place upon
cash benefits and welfare state services. This article explores the cash and services mix in, and
etween, welfare states with reference to recent welfare state typologies, most notably Esping-
Andersen’s decommodification-centred ‘worlds of welfare’. It compares the decommodification
levels of the main cash benefits with the main area of service provision: health care. The resulting
analysis suggests that when services are added into the comparative analysis of welfare state
egimes there are five welfare state clusters: Social Democratic, Liberal, Conservative, and sub-
groups within both the Liberal and Conservative regimes. The article concludes that, in orde
to maintain integrity or generalisability, future welfare state typologies need to reflect more
adequately the role of services in welfare state provision.
Introduction
Welfare state modelling has long been a preoccupation of comparative social
policy (Wilensky and Le
aux, 1958; Titmuss, 1974; The
orn, 1987; Esping-
Andersen, 1990; Castles and Mitchell, XXXXXXXXXXRecently, the literature has been
dominated by the extensive, and on-going, debate that has su
ounded Esping-
Andersen’s influential analysis of welfare state decommodification and the
esulting ‘three worlds of welfare’ typology (Esping-Andersen, 1990, 1999; Lewis,
1992; Leibfried, 1992; Castles and Mitchell, 1993; Orloff, 1993; Borchost, 1994;
Daly, 1994; Kangas, 1994; Ragin, 1994; Fe
era, 1996; Bonoli, 1997; Goodin
et al., 1999; Sainsbury, 1994, 1999; A
ahamson, 1999; Pitruzzello, 1999; Arts and
Gelissen, 2002; Kasza, XXXXXXXXXXHowever, what is remarkable about this debate is
that, while there are numerous critiques about his range (Leibfried, 1992; Castles
and Mitchell, 1993; Fe
era, 1996; Bonoli, 1997), his methodology (Kangas, 1994;
Ragin, 1994; Pitruzzello, 1999) and the absence of gender in his typology
http:
journals.cam
idge.org
http:
journals.cam
idge.org Downloaded: 10 Jul 2013 IP address: XXXXXXXXXX
196 clare bam
a
(Lewis, 1992; Orloff, 1993; Sainsbury, 1994, 1999; Bam
a, 2004a), core procedures
have attracted less attention: the analytical focus on cash benefits (Alber, 1995;
A
ahamson, 1999; Kautto, 2002; Bam
a, 2005) and the creation of regimes that
generalise about all forms of social policy provision from this base (Kasza, 2002).
This ignores the fact that welfare states are also about the actual delivery of
services, such as health, education or social care, and that, far from being internally
consistent, countries vary in terms of the relative emphasis that they place upon
cash benefits and/or welfare state services (Korpi and Palme, 1998; Castles, 1998;
Kautto, XXXXXXXXXXIndeed, welfare services may well account for the greatest differen-
ces both between and within countries’ welfare state a
angements (Castles, 1998).
Health care is by far the largest area of welfare state service delivery,
accounting as it does for an