Sneaker 2013
look at the Case name "Sneaker 2013 pdf" and answer the question using excel file "Sneaker 2013 Student"
An excel file has been placed to assist you in determining the FCF and NPV for the Sneaker 2013 project.
1. Please calculate the NPV for Sneaker XXXXXXXXXXDO NOT use for MACRS for depreciation, assume the CCA rate will be 5% for the building, and 20% for any equipment. Assume the building and equipment will be sold for their respective UCC values at the end of t6.
2.
What other factors might you want to take into account that are not captured in the NPV analysis (i.e. quantitative and qualitative)? You should jot these factors down as bullet points along with a few sentences to explain their relevance. Would any of these factors change your answer to question 1? Whether you answer yes or no be prepared defend your answer using in a few
ief sentences.
Sneaker 2013
Investment Analysis Sneaker 2013
Assumptions 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Sales (millions of pairs) 1.2 1.6 1.4 2.4 1.8 0.9
Price per pair $115
Cannibalization ($ millions) $35 $15
Variable costs % sales 55%
SG&A ($ millions) $7
Endorsement ($ millions) $2
Other advert/promotion ($ millions) $25 $15 $10 $30 $25 $15
A/R as % sales 8%
Inventory as % variable cost 25%
AP as % variable cost 20%
Factory expansion ($ millions) $150
Equipment ($ millions) $15
Allowable installation $5
Inventory beginning $15
AP beginning $5
CCA rate building 5%
CCA rate equipment 20%
Tax rate 40%
Cost of Capital 11%
Sneaker 2013 NPV analysis 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Revenue
Cannibalization
Net revenue
Variable cost
SG&A expense
Endorsement expense
Other advert/promotion
Factory amortization expense
Equipment amortization expense
Pretax operating profit
Taxes
After tax operating profit (NI)
Amortization expense
Change in NWC
Factory - investment/salvage
Equipment - investment/salvage
FCF
NPV at cost of capital
Change in NWC
NWC required
Change NWC
UCC factory
UCC begin
CCA exp
UCC end
UCC equipment
UCC begin
CCA exp
UCC end
Persistance
Investment Analysis Persistance
Assumptions 1 2 3
Hiking and walking market size $350 $402.5 $462.9
Growth of Market 15% 15% 1
Estimated Market share (%) 15% 18% 20% 2
Variable costs % sales 38% 3
SG&A % sales 12% 10% 8%
Other advert/promotion ($ millions) $3 $2 $2
Technology purchase, tax deductible ($ millions) $50
Equipment ($ millions) $8
AR and Inventory beginning $25
AP beginning $10
CCA rate equipment 20%
Tax rate 40%
Cost of Capital 14%
Persistance NPV analysis 1 2 3
Revenue
Variable cost
SG&A expense
Other advert/promotion
Equipment amortization expense
Technology purchase
Pretax operating profit
Taxes
After tax operating profit (NI)
Amortization expense
Change in NWC
Equipment - investment/salvage
FCF
NPV at cost of capital
Change in NWC
NWC required
Change NWC
UCC equipment
UCC begin
CCA exp
UCC end
Sneaker 2013
This case was prepared by Richard T. Bliss, Professor of Finance, and Mark Potter, Associate Professor of Finance, at Babson
College, based on published sources. It was developed as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate effective or ineffective
handling of an administrative situation. It is not intended to serve as an endorsement, source of primary data or illustration of
effective or ineffective management.
Copyright © 2014 Babson College and licensed for publication to Harvard Business Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of
this publication can be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission of
Babson College.
1
BAB166
NOVEMBER 2014
Sneaker 2013
The Situation
It was 6:35 p.m. on a Friday as Michelle Rodriguez held her head in her hands and sought
to regain focus. Her company, New Balance, based in Brighton, Massachusetts, had recently
implemented a policy on work-life balance. She had just made the mistake of opening an email
from the senior VP of product development, Monte Holliday, who needed a position report by
Monday morning on one of New Balance’s most promising new athletic shoes.
On the heels of the 2012 London Olympics, New Balance saw an opportunity in the 12- to
18-year-old male segment of the market, which their larger competitors had ignored.
Established, well-known Olympic athletes like Usain Bolt already had multi-million dollar
endorsement deals for athletic footwear, and they dominated the age 18 to 24 male market for
unning shoes.1 New Balance did not have the resources or the star power to compete in this
segment. However, New Balance saw an opportunity to target a younger consumer if they could
craft an effective marketing and advertising campaign around the right athlete. Holliday and
New Balance CEO Jim Davis had just returned from London after holding preliminary meetings
with several potential new endorsers. The most promising was a 19-year-old phenomenon from
Grenada named Kirani James.
By winning gold in the 400-meter dash in London, James became the first runner from
outside the United States to win the event in more than three decades.2 With a winning time of
43.94 seconds, he was also the first non-U.S. runner to finish the 400 under 44 seconds. James’s
victory was a huge feat for his country. Grenada had never won any Olympic medal, much less
gold, and he returned home to a hero’s welcome. His relative youth, and the fact that many
1 In 2010, Bolt, then 24 years old, signed a new contract with Puma that paid him $9 million annually.
2 Before James, the last non-American to win the Olympic 400 race was Russian Viktor Markin in 1980, the year the
United States boycotted the Moscow Games.
A
ut
ho
iz
ed
fo
us
e
on
ly
y
lu
o
yu
an
in
fn
ce
44
7
at
U
ni
ve
s
ity
o
f C
al
ga
y
f
om
1
9
2
02
2
to
5
1
2
02
2.
U
se
o
ut
si
de
th
es
e
pa
a
m
et
e
s
is
a
c
op
y
ig
ht
v
io
la
tio
n.
BAB166
NOVEMBER 2014
Sneaker 2013
2
observers felt James was still improving, made him a likely contender for years to come. New
Balance saw James as the perfect athlete to appeal to a younger audience, and Davis wanted him
on board. As the afterglow of the Olympic flame faded, Davis knew they needed to act quickly to
capitalize on James’s new-found global fame.
In spite of the economic downturn and subsequent forecasts of the demise of athletic
footwear, the multi-billion dollar athletic footwear industry continued to grow steadily, if not
spectacularly. A recent industry report claimed that 2012 would be the best athletic footwear
market in over a decade. At the high end of the market, new high-tech shoes were coming out at
a rapid pace. Air Jordan Retros, the Nike Mag Flux Capacitor, Reebok Pump Twilight Zone, and
the Ewing 33 Hi were selling well. The highly anticipated LeBron Nike X Plus, due out in fall
2012 and forecast to retail for a staggering $315, incorporated technology and pressure/motion
sensors that would track and store data on distance, speed, and jumping height. The shoe New
Balance had designed for James was envisioned as a medium-tech, high quality running shoe at
a reasonable price just under $200 retail. It would be marketed globally and had been
tentatively du
ed Sneaker 2013 until a final name could be selected.
The business case for Sneaker 2013 needed to be thorough and complete. It required input
from sales and marketing, technology engineers, manufacturing, and finance. The data were
organized and thorough, and it was up to Rodriguez to come up with a compelling analysis and a
ecommendation about whether to proceed. She knew her boss and the New Balance CEO were
excited at the idea of Sneaker 2013 and at having Kirani James as their newest athlete endorser.
But she also knew that all the excitement and flash in the world could not make up for a project
if the financials did not work.
Sneaker 2013
The business case team had compiled the following baseline information su
ounding the
Sneaker 2013 project:
1. The life of the Sneaker 2013 project was expected to be six years. Assume the analysis
took place at the end of 2012.
2. The suggested retail price of the shoe was $190. Gross margins for high-end athletic
footwear averaged about 40% at the retail level, meaning each pair sold would net New
Balance $115.
A
ut
ho
iz
ed
fo
us
e
on
ly
y
lu
o
yu
an
in
fn
ce
44
7
at
U
ni
ve
s
ity
o
f C
al
ga
y
f
om
1
9
2
02
2
to
5
1
2
02
2.
U
se
o
ut
si
de
th
es
e
pa
a
m
et
e
s
is
a
c
op
y
ig
ht
v
io
la
tio
n.
BAB166
NOVEMBER 2014
Sneaker 2013
3
3. The global athletic footwear market in 2011 totaled approximately $74.5 billion and was
expected to grow at a CAGR of 1.8% from 2011 to 2018, reaching $84.4 billion by 2018.3
Based on market research and analysis of other recent athlete endorsements, the New
Balance marketing division estimated the following sales volumes for Sneaker 2013:
Year XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Pairs sold (millions XXXXXXXXXX8 0.9
The 2016 number assumed Kirani James participated in the 2016 games in Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, and won at least one medal.4
4. For the first two years, the introduction of Sneaker 2013 would reduce sales of existing
New Balance shoes as follows:
Lost sales: 2013: $35 million 2014: $15 million
Assume the lost revenue had the same margins as Sneaker 2013.
5. In order to produce the shoe, the firm needed to build a factory in Vietnam. This
equired an immediate outlay of $150 million, to be depreciated on a 39-year MACRS5
asis. Depreciation percentages for the first six years respectively were: 2.6%, 5%, 4.7%,
4.5%, 4.3%, and 4.0%. The firm’s analysts estimated the building would be sold for $102
million at project termination. This “salvage value” has not been taken into consideration
when computing annual depreciation charges.6
6