LITERATURE REVIEW – Dissertation – Occupational therapy
Research question (AIM): To explore how the use of assistive technology impacts occupational performance (this could either be self-care or leisure) for older people with dementia.
OR
Exploration of how the use of assistive technology impacts occupational performance (this could either be self-care or leisure of older people.
Must critically appraised 10 primary research key articles minimum using CASP TOOL which must include the 3 variables to be discussed in the literature review section. (Attached CASP TOOL LINK) to be used for each article and given to me.
CASP TOOL TO BE USED TO CRITICALLY APPRAISE KEY LITERATURE FOUND.
Please click on the link to access appropriate checklist to be used - https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
For example for qualitative research - https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-Download.pdf
· Must be properly referenced using Harvard referencing style.
· MUST KEEP A LOG OF SEARCHES AND RESULTS FOUND IN THIS FORMAT. THIS IS TO SHOW HOW SEARCHES WAS NARROWED DOWN. EG
Citation Template for Dissertation
Date | Database | Keywords | Limits | Results |
Eg 08/06/18 | Psychnet | Dementia | | |
| Psychnet | Dementia AND Assistive technology | Peer reviewed, 10 years | |
11/06/18 | | - Alzhermers XXXXXXXXXXAND Assistive technology
- Alzhermers XXXXXXXXXXAND Assistive technology AND communicating device
| Peer reviewed, 10 years | From 25 to 7 2 articles (1 not appropriate for my study) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Managing Found Results
Citation | Summary | Topic (Themes) | Relevancy |
Eg: Young, et al., 2010 | Dissuasion of new students | HE, Reading lists | Background information, relevant articles, Key articles etc |
| | | |
Literature Review as Method:
· Must have clear research question
· Search strategy has to be identified
· Analysis strategy to be identified
Literature Review
A critical appraisal of primary source material on the dissertation topic, which may or may not be linked to a particular theoretical, political or conceptual view.
References should be comprehensive and may show evidence of consideration of material from various fields of study. Excessive use of quotations should be avoided.
A typical layout could be:
Title Page
Abstract
Acknowledgement
Table of Contents
List of Illustrations
Introduction
Process
Background
Literature Review
Discussion
Conclusions
Reflection
Recommendations
Limitations
References
Appendices
LITERATURE REVIEW
Mark Allocation for the Dissertation – 10,000 words limit
Abstract and Introduction
Marks allocated = 15%
Consider: Does the abstract give an appropriate overview of the study?
Is there any justification for the study?
Are there any supporting Government policies/guidelines etc?
Are the aims and objectives clearly outlined?
Process and Method
Marks allocated = 10%
Consider: Is an indication given of why this method was used?
Has the review process been clearly outlined?
Background
Marks allocated = 10%
Consider: Has appropriate background been given?
What research has been done before this study?
Review
Marks allocated = 35%
Consider: Has the literature been presented critically?
Are references relevant and current?
Does it include ongoing debate?
Is there evidence of the students understanding?
Discussions (15%), Conclusion (5%), Reflection & Recommendations (5%) Marks allocated = 25%
Consider: Are arguments drawn together?
Do the conclusions relate to earlier sections?
Is there evidence of reflection?
Are Recommendations made?
Are Limitations recorded?
Presentation:
Marks allocated = 5%
Consider: Was the work structured, organised and sign posted clearly?
Was it readable, correct grammar used?
Were results presented clearly, well formatted?
Correctly referenced? Word length?
Are references relevant and up to date?
Conducting research and developing research skills are necessary for Occupational Therapists in today’s changing health and social care environments. Healthcare practitioners need to be basing their practice on research evidence. Research needs to be conducted by Occupational Therapists because of:
Evidence Based Practice
- The current emphasis on evidence based practice has encouraged practitioners, as well as academics, in occupational therapy to consider undertaking research
- Evidence is needed to confirm that the procedures adopted make the best use of available resources within the legal, political and economic frameworks that govern practice
Supporting the underpinning of the Philosophical Base of the Profession
- The proper domain of occupational therapy research is the study of the nature of occupation, including how it influences health and how it is applied to the practice of occupational therapy and its application to health care
Clinical Governance
- Its basic principles are directed towards improving quality of services to clients and spreading good practice. This is a requirement of the Government and the College of Occupational Therapists
- Quality is the business of all in the organisation. The responsibility is upon every Occupational Therapist to scrutinise the effectiveness and efficiency of the service they provide. This is a requirement of the Government, College of Occupational Therapists and the Health and Care Professions Council
Continued Professional Development
- Occupational Therapists shall be personally responsible for actively maintaining and developing their professional competence, and shall base service delivery on accurate and current information in the interests of high quality care. This is a requirement of the Government, College of Occupational Therapists and the Health and Care Professions Council
Aim & Objectives
Aim
To provide the students with the opportunity to plan, participate in and evaluate an independent study following the research process
Objectives
In undertaking this activity the student will:
a. Design a project to address a research issue in occupational therapy / occupational science
b. Critically evaluate relevant literature
c. Undertake a project and analyse data using appropriate techniques
d. Write a Dissertation or Research Report and Media Presentation about the project undertaken
Indicative reading:
Aveyard, H. (2014) Doing a literature review in health and social care; a practical guide. Berkshire: Open University: McGraw-Hill
Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. Tight, M. (2010) How to research. 4th ed. Buckingham: Open University
Bowling, A. (2014) Research methods in health. 4th ed. Berkshire: Open University: McGraw-Hill
Denscombe, M. (2014) The Good Research Guide: for small scale research projects. 5thed. Berkshire: Open University: McGraw-Hill
Hart, C. (2002) Doing a Literature Review: releasing the social science imagination. London: Sage.
Hesse-Biber, S.N. & Leavy, P. (2011) The practice of qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage
Rudestam, K.E. and R.R. Newton, (20015). Surviving your Disseertation; a Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process. 7th ed. London: Sage Publications.
General Guidance for Writing up a Dissertation
The following are some key points to draw to your attention as you begin to prepare to write up your Independent Study.
General Issues:
In addition to using the spell check (ensure it is English UK) on the computer also check grammar and style.
Abstract
The purpose of the abstract is to communicate the whole study in 150 to 200 words. It should contain little more than a sentence on each of the following – aim of the study, method, key finding(s), conclusion and recommendation.
Aim
The aim of the research should be stated clearly at the outset of the study in the Introduction and be obvious throughout the Independent Study. Make sure it is not ambiguous.
Bias
Ensure that your own bias does not influence the study and in particular the outcome. The Discussion should be based on what you actually found and not on what you wanted or thought you would find.
Confidentiality
All efforts must be made to ensure that the study is anonymised. Seek advice from your supervisor if you have difficulties with this.
Literature
On the whole students are expected to use current literature (ie within the last 10 years). In some situations it may be necessary to use older literature to provide some historical perspectives or include seminal pieces. Ensure you demonstrate your ability to critique the literature and your understanding of it.
Methodology
All projects are expected to include some justification for the methods chosen using relevant research theory. Also there should be adequate detail of the method to allow the study to be repeated.
Results
Always include the numbers and percentages when presenting results e.g. 9 (75%) or 75% (n=9). This ensures that results are not exaggerated. If just 75% was given in the above example this may seem a strong argument but if that is out of a sample size of 12 it allows the reader to interpret the finding in the real context.
For quantitative research, results can be presented using tables or graphs or in the text. It is not necessary to provide a table for just two pieces of information, e.g. 7 (70%) said yes and 3 (30%) said no. Examples like this should be reported in the text. Only use tables etc when there is more information to report.
Discussion
The Discussion chapter, where the results are discussed, should draw on both your findings and issues raised in the Introduction, Background and Literature sections.
Referencing
There is no excuse for poor referencing at this stage when appropriate academic style has been expected throughout the course so far. If in doubt access the Harvard Reference Guide Handbook and/or Learning Development
Appendices
These should contain only information that is essential for further understanding. It should not include any information that a reader will not need to read. It can include items such as summaries of acts or policy documents. It must contain a copy of any participant information sheet, consent form, questionnaire or interview schedule used in the study as well as the ethics checklist signed off by the supervisor. If interviews were conducted it should also contain a sample of one transcript (no more than three pages). For all documentation including copies of letters ensure you remove your name and any information that could breach confidentiality.
Although the Appendices do not carry a grade any breach of confidentiality anywhere within the Dissertation will be subject to the sanctions through the appropriate University of Northampton policies and regulations.
Breach of confidentiality will result in an automatic fail
References
What is a reference?
It is a set of data describing a document or part of document. The information given should be detailed and accurate enough to enable you or anyone else, to identify easily the item referred to, and to find the source of that item.
Why should I use a reference?
In academic studies it is essential that you read works from a number of authors who may have a range of ideas, thoughts and beliefs about the topics you are studying. This will give you a foundation of knowledge on which to base discussion and form your own conclusions or hypotheses. This process should be reflected in your Independent Study by the acknowledgement of the texts and articles that you have referred to when preparing your work.
When should I use a reference?
Whenever it is important that the work you are referring to is clearly identified. You will need to write a reference:
a. when quoting a book, article or paper in text
b. when stating a fact, view or theory for example that another author has previously stated.
c. when compiling the reference list
Failure to reference work of another author within the Independent Study is known as plagiarism and implies that you are claiming the information to be your own. This is not acceptable within the University and will lead to disciplinary procedures being taken against the student concerned.
GRADE CRITERIA: Credit level 6 Honours Level
HE Credit level 3 (6)/ HEQF Honours Level |
An outstanding Distinction | An exceptional first | A+ | 80-100 | Work which fulfils all the criteria of the grade below, but at an exceptional standard. |
A very strong Distinction | A Good First | A | 75-79 | Work of distinguished quality, which is based on a rigorous, comprehensive and detailed knowledge base, including awareness of the provisional nature of knowledge and its theoretical, ethical and conceptual dimensions, together with its wider context and implications. Work will demonstrate sustained ability to engage in analysis of new/abstract data and situations, synthesise data and concepts to design novel solutions, critically evaluate evidence and its contradictions, and confidence in application to define and propose resolutions to complex problems relevant to the field of study or assessment task. This will be the basis for authoritative arguments and judgements and work which meets professional standards in relation to a full range of key skills. There will be strong evidence of competence across a range of specialised skills using them to plan, develop and evaluate problems solving strategies, to challenge received opinion and develop reflective judgements and reports. Clear evidence of capability to operate autonomously with minimal guidance in complex and unpredictable contexts using a wide range of innovative and standard techniques will be demonstrated. Outputs will be communicated effectively, accurately and reliably. |
A clear Distinction | A First | A- | 70-74 | Work of very good quality, which displays most but not all of the criteria for the grade above. |
A Distinction | A high upper second | B+ | 67-69 | Work which clearly fulfils the criteria for the grade below, but shows a greater degree of capability in relevant intellectual/subject/key skills. |