The Marking Ru
ic
The marking ru
ic below shows how your assignment will be marked.
Note that some sections are more heavily weighted than others.
Additional support and guidance will be offered via the discussion forum and any Adobe Connect sessions.
Criteria
HD
DI
CR
PS
FL
Mark
1 The report offers an appropriate structure throughout the assignment
The section headings are used as provided
The mandatory section headings have not been used
/5
2. The report demonstrates a clear abstract that outlines the content and focus of the assignment.
The abstract does not exceed 50 words.
A clear, succinct and appropriate abstract is evident.
The abstract outlines the content and makes clear the focus of the assignment.
An appropriate abstract is evident.
The abstract
iefly outlines the content and describes the focus of the assignment.
A
ief abstract is evident.
The abstract offers scant information about the focus of the assignment.
A scant and unclear abstract is evident.
The focus of the report is not addressed in the abstract.
No abstract is evident.
The abstract bears little relationship to the focus of the assignment.
/5
3 The report demonstrates a clear understanding of the communication microskills as part of effective interpersonal communication in healthcare.
A comprehensive understanding of the communication microskills as part of effective interpersonal communication in healthcare.
An advanced understanding of the communication microskills as part of effective interpersonal communication in healthcare.
A moderate understanding of the communication microskills as part of effective interpersonal communication in healthcare.
A basic understanding of the communication microskills as part of effective interpersonal communication in healthcare.
No discussion of the communication microskills as part of effective interpersonal communication in healthcare.
/18
4. The report critically analyses and appraises the performance of the professionals in the team. The report notes the ba
iers to communication and explains how they can do better.
The report critically analyses and appraises all the positive and negative contributions from each team member, co
ectly identifies any ba
iers and identifies ways to improve their performance as supported in the professional literature
The report critically analyses and appraises most of the positive and negative contributions from each team member, co
ectly identifies any ba
iers and identifies ways to improve their performance as supported in the professional literature
The report contains an above average critical analysis and appraisal of some of the positive and negative contributions from each team member, co
ectly identifies most ba
iers and identifies ways to improve their performance as supported in the professional literature.
The report contains an average critical analysis and appraisal of only a few of the positive and negative contributions from each team member, co
ectly identifies some ba
iers and identifies ways to improve their performance as supported in the professional literature
The report provides a scant or no analysis or appraisal of the contributions from each team member and identifies ways limited to no to way improve their performance as supported in the professional literature.
/18
5. The report offers a critique of the interprofessional teamwork portrayed in the video based on the professional literature.
The report offers a comprehensive critique of the interprofessional teamwork portrayed in the video and explains how they can do better according to the professional literature.
The report offers an advanced critique of the interprofessional teamwork portrayed in the video and explains how they can do better according to the professional literature.
The report offers an average critique of the interprofessional teamwork portrayed in the video and explains how they can do better according to the professional literature.
The report offers a scant critique of the interprofessional teamwork portrayed in the video and explains how they can do better according to the professional literature.
The report offers no critique of the interprofessional teamwork portrayed in the video and does not explain how they can do better according to the professional literature.
/17
6. The report offers an analysis of how the performance of the team might affect the organisation and how the organisation can improve their performance
The report offers a comprehensive analysis of how the performance of the team might affect the organisation and how the organisation can improve their performance.
The report offers an advanced analysis of how the performance of the team might affect the organisation and how the organisation can improve their performance.
The report offers an average analysis of how the performance of the team might affect the organisation and how the organisation can improve their performance.
The report offers a scant analysis of how the performance of the team might affect the organisation and how the organisation can improve their performance.
The report offers no analysis of how the performance of the team might affect the organisation and how the organisation can improve their performance.
/17
7. The report is clear and concise with good English grammar and co
ect spelling
The report excels in clarity uses co
ect grammar, is free of repetition and contains no spelling e
ors.
The report is clear and concise with good English grammar and co
ect spelling
The report is mostly clear and concise with good English grammar and co
ect spelling
The report has some paucity of expression with some grammatical and spelling e
ors.
The report is difficult to read with many ambiguities, fragmented sentences or wrong word choices. There are many spelling e
ors.
/10
8. Use only quality academic sources and acknowledge them throughout.
Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) referencing conventions for the in text and end text areas
Displays excellence in using only quality academic sources and acknowledging them throughout the assignment.
Displays excellence in accurately and consistently adhering to APA (6th Edition) referencing conventions for the in text and end text areas
Displays advanced skills in using only quality academic sources and acknowledging them throughout the assignment
Displays advanced skills in accurately and consistently adhering to APA (6th Edition) referencing conventions for the in text and end text areas
Displays above average skills in using only quality academic sources and acknowledging them throughout the assignment
Displays an average compliance in accurately and consistently adhering to APA (6th Edition) referencing conventions for the in text and end text areas
Displays average skills in using only quality academic sources and acknowledging them throughout the assignment
Displays scant compliance in accurately and consistently adhering to APA (6th Edition) referencing conventions for the in text and end text areas
Displays little to no skill in using only quality academic sources and acknowledging them throughout the assignment
Displays no compliance in accurately and consistently adhering to APA (6th Edition) referencing conventions for the in text and end text areas
/10
Total
/100