Assessment criteria |
Assessable Components | HD100% - 85% | DI84% - 75% | CR74% - 65% | PS64% - 50% | FL49% - 0 |
Abstract section (5 Marks) | A very concise abstract where the aim of study is perfectly articulated, the central question is precisely formulated, | A concise abstract where the aim of study is appropriately articulated, the research question is formulated. | A concise abstract where the aim of study is relatively articulated, the research question is adequately formulated. | A concise abstract where the aim of study is articulated, the research question is vaguely formulated. | Incomplete abstract with no research question identified. |
Introduction section (5 Marks) | A comprehensive discussion in relation to the research background as well as the aim/objectives of research is included. | A highly detailed discussion in relation to the significance as well as the aim/objectives of research is included. | A thorough discussion in relation to the significance as well as the aim/objectives of research is included. | An adequate discussion in relation to the significance as well as the aim/objectives of research is included | An incomplete or irrelevant discussion is included. |
Select literature that reflects recent developments in the area and emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research) (2 Marks) | Literature selected magnificently reflects recent developments in the area and completely emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research). | Literature selected clearly reflects recent developments in the area and largely emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research). | Literature selected relatively reflects recent developments in the area and generally emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research).. | Literature selected relatively reflects recent developments in the area but hardly emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research). | Literature selected does not reflect recent developments in the area and does not emphasize primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research). |
Identify gaps in the literature.(4 Marks) | Comprehensive knowledge of the topic and in depth explanation of the issues that are not addressed; | Reasonable knowledge of the topic and a comprehensive explanation of the issues that are not addressed. | Provided factual/conceptual knowledge of the topic and an overall explanation of the issues that are not addressed. | Limited knowledge of the of the topic and a basic explanation of the issues that are not addressed. | Fails to satisfy minimum requirements of explaining the issues. |
Comment on future research directions based on the identified gaps i.e what other research questions arise from the literature.(4 Marks) | The proposed future research direction is well formulated and ably answers all the identified gaps. | The proposed future direction is adequately formulated and sufficiently answers most of the identified gaps. | The proposed future research direction is adequately formulated and answers some of the identified gaps. | The proposed future research direction is either not adequately formulated or does not sufficiently answer the identified gaps. | The proposed future research direction is not adequately formulated and does not sufficiently answer the identified gaps |
Be written clearly (with content well organized) (3 Marks) | Highly developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling accurate. Formal English is used throughout. | Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling accurate. Mostly uses formal English. | Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors. More or less uses formal English. | Some skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Meaning apparent, but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar & spelling contains several careless errors. Hardly uses formal English | Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised. Grammar & spelling contains many errors. Does not use formal English. |
Provide references (at least three) using APA referencing system including in text citations.(2 Marks) | Faultlessreferencing,includingreference list and in text citations.High qualityreferences. | Very goodreferencing,includingreference list andin text citations.High qualityreferences. | Good referencing,includingreference list andin text citations.Good qualityreferences. | Evidence ofrudimentaryreferencing skills.Mix of good andpoor qualityreferences. | Sub-standardreferencing.Poor qualityreferences. |