Solution
Kuldeep answered on
Oct 11 2020
Privacy and Security
Privacy and Security
Student Name
University Name
Unit Code
Unit Name
Contents
Personal and ethical implications for the privacy of individual clients of an NGO that has adopted the My Support approach 2
Personal and ethical implications for the security of individual clients of an NGO that has adopted the My Support approach 6
Recommendations to a client of an NGO that has adopted the MySupport approach in order to protect their individual privacy and the security of their information and digital ID. 9
References 12
Personal and ethical implications for the privacy of individual clients of an NGO that has adopted the My Support approach
Although the “safe access” or “acceptance model” as a non-governmental organization security management approach still has value– the principle of reducing security risks by establishing local relationships as well as instilling trust through being seen as fair in the community – nowadays we find threats Not necessarily in a community supported by NGOs. Instead, they come from individuals and groups who have access to NGO activities and geographic, who have incentives or means to influence the security and safety of the NGO employee, and those who support or collaborate with NGOs, and the wider the ability of NGOs to the function as an organization.
Non-governmental organizations face direct as well as indirect risks, whether they are selected or targeted, or are exposed to threat through proximity as well as the environment. Hence, the NGO community must be aware that safety, as well as security, is no longer seen as an independent component of
oader organizational resilience, however, the threats (moreover the resulting risks) that they face must be viewed from a holistic perspective. Understand the chain reaction that an event can have on an entire organization, as well as the cascading issues or risks that can be caused by a single event(Anwar & Brusilovsky, 2017).
This adds to the stricter requirements of donors for ethics and compliance, the increased supervision of host governments, the rapid changes in cybercrime risks, the increasing expectations of staff and donors for developing good care responsibilities, and the work The wide geographical distribution of personnel and the widespread use of consultants and volunteers remain a real issue or a challenge in seeking effective and rational management of risks and can still function as a non-governmental organization.
Development approach: Many NGOs are still concerned about what some people call “hardware” development methods, namely infrastructure construction and service delivery; rather than what some people call “software” approaches that enable people or local institutions to control or manage digital information. Other NGOs seem to be unaware of the changes in government roles, changing aid paradigms, and the efficiency of “rights-based” instead of “welfare” approaches. While funding and maintaining services to provide interventions has become increasingly difficult, most local NGOs continue to adhere to these interventions. NGOs are keenly aware of all the growing needs of the poor and are stunned by how to respond to all of these needs(Boehme-Nebler, 2016). The community lacks ownership of ownership and development interventions. Some communities are undermined by dependence-creating interventions furthermore are not tending to do things for themselves. It is complex to make the plans pertinent to changing circumstances, as well as the culture of the handouts is difficult to deal with. There are no recognized ethical guidelines and conflicting methods.
Relationships with INGOs: What local NGO is concerned about is that giant, mainly international NGO, occupy a lot of space and find it difficult to find their own space. International NGO often intervenes and are not concerned with building sustainable local civil society organizations. They pay government and community members to participate in their projects, while local NGO does not have the facility to do so. International non-governmental organizations are also operated by local volatile short-term project methods. They pay higher salaries and attract local NGs. They are also responsible for creating a high-cost image which reduces the reliability of this area (Brkan, 2017). Competing with local and international veterans for local NGOs is difficult and inappropriate. Many external organizations do not work with local civil society organizations. They only provide unfair competition and hinder our area's development and cost-effective development interventions. International NGOs should not be allowed to work on the land, pay allowances and manipulate people; they cannot be managed by the views of international NGO; they suppress local NGOs.
Political Interference: In some areas, NGO leaders believe that intervention by local politicians and civic leaders is a major obstacle in their work. If NGO is involved in sensitive issues like land disputes then local leaders can threaten by adopting non-governmental organizations. NGO does not know the Council - and possibly council - where they are protected from such threats.
NGO Board and NGO Council: Several participants rarely know the differences between the two agencies, the NGO Coordination Committee, and the National Non-Government Organization Council; and they do not know their roles and responsibilities. Most participants said that the NGO Code of Conduct was outdated and there was a need to update as soon as possible. Participants also complained that the NGO Council was poorly managed and no services were provided to NGO (Jori, 2015). He felt that the NGO Committee did not honor the Board and there was distrust between the government and NGO. Participants fully knew that the public image of the NGO sector was very bad and they believed that it was primarily due to the internal struggle between leadership, politics and the council and non-governmental organizations. Some government departments are considered to deliberately defeat NGOs. Some participants believe that government bureaucracies have hampered NGOs and their members.
Relationships with INGOs: What local NGOs are concerned about is that giants, mainly international NGOs, occupy a lot of space and find it difficult to find their own space. International NGOs often intervene and are not concerned with building sustainable local civil society organizations. They pay government and community members to participate in their projects, while local NGOs do not have the facility to do so. International...