I will attach the criteria for the assignment

Childhood Obesity
Contents
Abstract    1
Background    2
Aims    2
Methods    2
Results    2
Conclusion    2
Introduction    3
Literature Search    3
Methodology Analysis    3
Synthesis and Interpretation    4
Design    4
Participants and Sampling    4
Interviews    4
Variables    4
Data Analysis    5
Results and Discussion    5
Validity and Reliability    6
Conclusion    6
Annotated Bibliography    6
Integrated Review    11
References    12
Abstract
Background
Although the preventive benefits of SES (socioeconomic status) on childhood obesity are well-acknowledged, these implications may vary among ethnic and racial groups.

Aims
This study used a
oad sample to look at racial differences in factors such as family income as well as childhood obesity in Hispanic and white Americans.

Methods
Data from a nationally representative survey in America was utilised in this cross-sectional research. This study comprised 76,705 children aged 2 to 17 who were either white or Hispanic. The independent variable has been the family income to demand ratio. Childhood obesity has been the outcome.

Results
A greater income-to-demands proportion was reported to be effective against childhood obesity. Nevertheless, race is associated with the earnings-to-demands ratio on the likelihood of childhood obesity, with Hispanic households seeing fewer impacts than white ones.

Conclusion
Income has a weaker protective impact on childhood obesity for Hispanics than for white people. Regulations should be above accessibility to SES and overcome structural impediments in Hispanics' lives that result in a worse health gain on similar SES assets.

Introduction
Notwithstanding the well-established impacts of SES (socioeconomic status) on health, the improved health associated with SES resources differs among ethnic and demographic groups. Family income, parents’ education, and parents' work are protective variables for children's health issues, but financial stress and poverty are key risk factors for children's health problems. Poverty has a significant impact on childhood obesity. Though high SES decreases population risk exposure in general, the benefit is significantly less for minority groups than for majority groups (Assari, 2018).
This study employed a nationwide sample to evaluate racial disparities in the impact of family income on childhood obesity in America in order to truly comprehend the sub-population variability in the protective impact of SES on obesity among children.

Literature Search
Around 40 percent of Hispanic American children are obese, with 20 percent obese, which is more than most races and ethnicities. As per their height, age, and gender, Hispanic children may be subjected to behavioural, environmental, and sociocultural effects that influence their capability to sustain a balanced BMI (body mass index) (Tamayo et al., 2020). Hispanic parents' behaviours and social expectations may also prevent their children from indulging in healthy diets and active lifestyles, increasing their child's risk of obesity. From 2019 to 2021, Hispanic children remained 1.8 times more vulnerable to be obese than white children (Anderson et al., 2019).
In a research study, obesity was more prevalent in Hispanic females and males than in white people. These data indicate that racial inequalities in obesity are restricted to individuals with higher levels of socioeconomic status, while there have been no race-based inequalities in obesity amongst individuals with poor socioeconomic status who share a common social environment (Otte
ach et al., 2018).

Methodology Analysis
A qualitative research technique was employed in this study. This was most suitable in the perspective of childhood obesity, as firsthand documentation of patient experiences is one of the advantages of qualitative research in healthcare. It would provide a summary of proposals for improvement and the capacity to discern common issues and wants related to care quality.

Synthesis and Interpretation

Design
This study utilised data from the Survey of Children's Health (SCH), a study funded by the Child and Maternal Health Bureau and the Health Statistics Center, in a cross-sectional methodology. The inconsistencies may not exist as SCH was a cutting-edge study that produced state and national-level prevalence rates of a wide range of physical, psychological, and behavioural markers of children's health. The survey also collected data on the child's familial environment and community.

Participants and Sampling
For the sample frame, SCH employed the Local and State Area Integrated Telephonic Survey tool. To summarise the study's sample process, trained interviewers dialled different phone numbers to find families with a minimum of one child below the age of 18. Each child was chosen at random from eligible families, including one or even more children for the interview. Following exclusions for ineligible age, lost BMI, earnings to demand proportion, and ethnicity
ace, the analytic sample included 76,705 children aged 2 to 17 years.

Interviews
A total of 102,353 interviews were conducted as part of the study. Trained interviewers posed a set of questions to parents on their children's physical, psychological, and behavioural health; healthcare access; parental wellness; and community factors.

Variables
The following characteristics were assessed in the study: race, gender, socioeconomic status, obesity status, and age. Only Hispanics and whites were included. Parents were asked about their highest education. Obesity status has been a dichotomous variable computed depending on BMI, which has been determined based on parental data on the child's weight and height. Parents were interviewed about the height and weight of their children. Obesity is defined as having a BMI in the 95th percentile or higher.

Data Analysis
The sampling weights utilised in these studies were obtained from the public-utilisation SCH data collection. These weights include a basic sample weight as well as adjustments for multiple telephone services per home as well as non-response. The weights have been post-stratified such that the total of the weights for every state reflects the children's count in that state. Several regression models have been run on the pooled sample and every race separately.

Results and Discussion
It was discovered that there were disparities in the impact of family wealth on childhood obesity among Hispanic and white children. Obesity risk in Hispanic children was not affected by family income. This was not the case for white children, for whom wealth had a protective impact against obesity. According to this study's findings, the same SES marker is preventive against childhood obesity in the socially affluent (White) category but not in the economically poor (Hispanic) category. This discovery
oadens cu
ent research from adults and aged individuals to children. Even though the precise mechanism for such unequal benefits is unknown, they appear to begin in early childhood and are accountable for some of the wellness inequalities in children. That is, variable health impacts of parental SES are an early mechanism underlying the indirect influence of race on child health.
That study tracked 1781 children from birth to age 15 years of age and emphasised the Hispanic-White variations in the protective impact of family SES as well as family system at birth on later BMI at age of 15. The study discovered racial factors by family SES and racial factors by family structure associations on BMI, with hispanics having fewer impacts than whites. It should be stated unequivocally that the outcomes do not imply that Hispanics are incapable of effectively employing their existing SES resources to achieve meaningful health outcomes, since that would have been victim blaming.
According to one...