1
HSYP806 Systems Science in Healthcare
Assessment Task 3: Health Intervention Evaluation Presentation
Due: 12 noon Thursday 14th November 2019 (Week 14)
Weighting: 40% (30% content and notes; 10% visual design and presentation)
Length: 10 PowerPoint slides, no more than 15 minutes of presentation time
Details
Select one of two health interventions described below and prepare an evaluation plan using the six-
step method covered in weeks 7-8 (Evaluation Methods).
Choose one (1) of the two interventions:
1. Family planning intervention. By dialling a toll-free number, callers (women in a community) can
speak to a trained educator to get accurate information about the co
ect use of family planning methods, how
to avoid unwanted pregnancies and the location of the nearest family planning clinic.
2. Telehealth – dermatology advice to community health care workers. Community health care workers use a
camera and laptop to capture and send images of patients to dermatology specialists located in the major
teaching hospital of the region. The dermatology specialists then provide the health care workers with
diagnostic and treatment advice and the location of specialized dermatology clinics and specialist Dermatology
physicians in the patient’s region.
Imagine you want to explain to a mixed audience of health professionals, how you would evaluate one of the
health interventions above, by using a 15-minute PowerPoint presentation.
The assignment must include:
10 PowerPoint slides with each slide including accompanying text in the notes section of each slide.
• The accompanying text, in the notes section of each slide, should be comprehensive and explain in-
depth the information contained on each slide. Full explanations, particularly in relation to the
evaluation six (6) steps, are required to elucidate the material on the slide.
• There should be at least one slide for each of the six (6) evaluation steps listed below.
• You need to include an introductory slide where you describe the intervention (in more detail than is
listed above), how it works and who it is designed to help.
• One slide will be used to list your references.
Six Evaluation Steps:
Step 1 Identify the change/outcome desired for the intervention and formulate evaluation questions
Step 2 Identify the boundaries and dimensions of your evaluation
Step 3 Select comparison groups
Step 4 Select techniques for measuring the change/outcome desired
Step 5 Plan the organization and conduct of your evaluation
Step 6 Report the results of your evaluation
Referencing
Please refer to the Unit Guide on iLearn particularly in relation to academic integrity and assignment guide. It is
essential that any resources, journal articles, reports, books, web pages etc. refe
ed to in your assignment are
appropriately referenced using the Vancouver citation style. Software is used to check all assignments for
plagiarism.
What you must submit:
You are required to record yourself presenting the slides in PowerPoint and to upload ONE PowerPoint file that contains:
1. The PowerPoint presentation (10 slides maximum) with a voice-over recording (no more than 15 minutes in length)
2. The PowerPoint slides and notes pages accompanying each slide
2
Instructions on how to record yourself in your PowerPoint presentation are included below
Guide for assessment/marking of assignment 3
There are two (2) marking ru
ics for this assignment (page 3).
One guide is for the content of the slides and the notes pages (30%) and one guide is for the visual design of the Power
Point slides and the presentation audio voiceover (10%).
Guidelines/tips for PowerPoint slides and notes
Keep it Simple
• Use only one message per slide. If you have more than one message, add a slide.
• Limit the amount of text on each slide - no one wants to read a JAMA article during your presentation.
• Use only elements that add to the content of the message. Use graphics that clearly support your message. Good
graphics can significantly add to learning, bad graphics can confuse and distract your audience.
• Maintain a consistent design with regard to colours, font styles, and graphics.
• You might use a formal typeface like Palatino and a symmetrical layout for a serious issue or you could use a
casual font like Comic Sans and an asymmetrical layout for a lighter topic.
• Notes pages should provide sufficient detail to describe and explain the information on the accompanying slide.
Slide Design
• Each slide should endeavor to address a single concept
• Slides should follow a logical progression, each building on the other
• Preferably use no more than six lines of text on any one slide
• Use upper and lower-case text, NOT all caps
• Choose a colour appropriate to the mood you want to convey
• Avoid using too many colours (maximum of 5)
• Use photographs/images to help the audience relate slide information to real world situations
(keep in mind that if you use an outside source it is under copyright and permission to use it
must be granted)
Source: Dartmouth College Li
ary ‘Power Point: Guides tips and help’ (Updated 16/6/17) [Internet] [Cited and modified
October 2018] Available from: ttps:
www.dartmouth.edu/~li
ary
iomed/guides/powerpoint.html
Useful resource on adding notes to PowerPoint (please note that for this assignment these notes need to include detailed
information supporting the slides) https:
www.duarte.com/presentation-skills-resources/everything-need-know-using-
speaker-notes-inpowerpoint/
To record your PowerPoint presentation voiceover, go to “Slide Show” and click the “Record Slide Show” button under.
Ensure that you have your speakers and microphone on. Simply go through your slide as if you are presenting to an
audience. Make sure your microphone is on. Save your file when you are happy with the presentation and submit it for
marking through the AT3 DropBox in iLearn.
Windows
Mac
https:
www.duarte.com/presentation-skills-resources/everything-need-know-using-speaker-notes-inpowerpoint
https:
www.duarte.com/presentation-skills-resources/everything-need-know-using-speaker-notes-inpowerpoint
3
Assessment Task 3 marking ru
ic – Content of PowerPoint Slides (30%)
Outstanding
HD
Advanced
D
Proficient
C
Functional
P
Limited
F
≥ 85% ≥ 75% ≥ 65% ≥ 50% < 50%
Criterion 1
Evaluation
Steps
1 & 2
8%
The
change outcome(s)
desired for the
intervention was
very clearly
outlined The
evaluation
questions were very
clearly related to
the
goals of the
program. The
oundaries and
dimensions of
the evaluation were
very clearly
presented
The change
outcome(s)
desired for the
intervention was
clearly outlined.
The evaluation
questions were
clearly related to
the goals of the
program. The
oundaries and
dimensions of
the evaluation
were clearly
presented
The change
outcome(s)
desired for the
intervention was
mostly clearly
outlined. The
evaluation
questions were
mostly clearly
elated to the
goals of the
program.
The boundaries
and dimensions
of the evaluation
were mostly
clearly presented
The change
outcome(s) for the
intervention
was not always
presented clearly
The evaluation
questions were
not always clearly
elated to the
goals of the
program
The boundaries
and dimensions of
the evaluation
were not always
clearly presented
The change
outcome(s)
for the
intervention was
not clearly
outlined
The evaluation
questions were not
clearly related to
the goals of the
program
The boundaries
and dimensions
of the evaluation
were not clearly
presented
Criterion 2
Eval Steps
3 & 4
8%
The descriptions of
groups and reasons
for selection were
presented in a very
coherent manner
The quantitative
and
qualitative
measures, how you
would collect these
data and challenges
in collection were
very clearly
presented
The descriptions
of the comparison
groups and
easons
for selection were
presented in a
very coherent
manner
The quantitative
and qualitative
measures, how
you would collect
these data and
challenges
in collection were
clearly presented
The descriptions
of the
comparison
groups and
easons
for selection
were mostly
presented in a
very coherent
manner
The quantitative
and qualitative
measures, were
mostly clearly
presented.
The descriptions
of the comparison
groups and
easons
for selection were
not always
presented in a
coherent manner
The quantitative
and
qualitative
measures were
not always clearly
presented
The descriptions of
the comparison of
the comparison
groups and reasons
for selection were
not presented
The quantitative
and qualitative
measures were not
clearly presented.
Criterion 3
Eval Steps
5 & 6
8%
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
udget, timelines,
stakeholders) and
eporting your
findings were
presented very
clearly
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
udget, timelines,
stakeholders) and
eporting your
findings were
presented clearly
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
udget,
timelines,
stakeholders)
and reporting
your findings
were mostly
presented clearly
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
udget, timelines,
stakeholders) and
eporting your
findings were not
always presented
clearly
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
udget, timelines,
stakeholders) and
eporting your
findings were not
presented clearly
Criterion 4
Referencing
6%
Referencing and
citation style is
co
ect (Vancouver
style) and
consistent between
the reference list
and the text in the
slides and notes
pages; the
eference list is
complete and
without e
ors
Referencing and
citation style is
consistent
(Vancouver style)
etween the text
in the slides and
notes pages and
the reference list
has only a few
minor mistakes
Some references
were
inconsistent
etween the text
in the slides and
notes