PUBH6013_Assessment_3B_Investigation_Report_Week_11
Page 1 of 4
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title PUBH6013: Qualitative Research Methods
Assessment Assessment 3B: Investigation Presentation
Individual/Group Individual
Length 500 words (+/-10%)
Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:
c) Apply qualitative research methods through undertaking
data collection through, e.g. focus group, interviews,
observational methods
d) Appreciate cultural and ethical considerations fo
qualitative research in Public Health
e) Understand sampling techniques, bias and rigour as they
apply to qualitative research
f) Apply coding and analysis techniques to qualitative data
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Week 12
Weighting 10%
Total Marks 100 marks
Context:
This assessment involves preparing a report with data analysis/discussion of interviews and a
ief presentation.
There are two steps for this assignment. Part A involves writing a report and Part B involves
a 10 minute presentation in class.
Assessment 3B advances skills in presenting the rationale, process, and results of a
qualitative project. Key understanding includes how to present key information from their
project design and results in a concise and effective fashion, and how to deliver a
presentation effectively. The assessment prepares students for an important task common
to the public health practitioner role.
Instructions:
Summarise your research question, methods, interview process, data analysis and results in a 5
minute presentation.
You can use the presentation mode of your choice ie PowerPoint, Prezi.
PUBH6013_Assessment_3B_Investigation_Report_Week_11
Page 2 of 4
Note: Online students may find PowerPoint easier to use, as it allows you to record na
ation
to each slide.
Submit Part A by uploading them via the Assessment 3 submission portal in Blackboard.
On-campus students will submit Part B through an in-class presentation.
Online students will submit Part B by uploading their recorded presentation to the relevant
forum thread in Blackboard.
Assessment Criteria:
• Understands the purpose of the presentation, and includes the content required in a
professional manner (40%)
• Effective presentation skills (60%)
PUBH6013_Assessment_3B_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 3 of 4
Learning Ru
ics
Assessment
Attributes Fail (Unacceptable)
Pass
(Functional)
Credit
(Proficient)
Distinction
(Advanced)
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
Grade Description
(Grading Scheme)
Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement
of one or more of the learning
objectives of the course, insufficient
understanding of the course content
and/or unsatisfactory level of skill
development.
Evidence of
satisfactory
achievement of course
learning objectives, the
development of
elevant skills to a
competent level, and
adequate
interpretation and
critical analysis skills.
Evidence of a good
level of understanding,
knowledge and skill
development in
elation to the content
of the course or work
of a superior quality on
the majority of the
learning objectives of
the course.
Demonstration of a
high level of
interpretation and
critical analysis skills.
Evidence of a high
level of
achievement of
the learning
objectives of the
course
demonstrated in
such areas as
interpretation and
critical analysis,
logical argument,
use of
methodology and
communication
skills.
Evidence of an
exceptional level of
achievement of
learning objectives
across the entire
content of the course
demonstrated in such
areas as
interpretation and
critical analysis,
logical argument,
creativity, originality,
use of methodology
and communication
skills.
Understands the
purpose of the
presentation, and
includes the content
equired in a
professional manner
Does not meet minimum standard
Demonstrates no awareness of context
and/or purpose of presentation.
Meets minimum
standard
Demonstrates limited
awareness of context
and/or purpose of
presentation.
Moves beyond
minimum standard
Demonstrates
consistent awareness
of context and/or
purpose of
presentation.
Exceeds minimum
standard
Demonstrates an
advanced and
integrated
understanding of
context and/or
purpose of
presentation.
Exceeds minimum
standard and exhibits
high levels of
independence
Consistently
demonstrates a
systematic and critical
understanding of
context and purpose
of presentation.
http:
www.tua.edu.au/media/50742/a240_grading-scheme.pdf
PUBH6013_Assessment_3B_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 4 of 4
40%
Effective
presentation skills
60%
Difficult to understand for audience, no
logical/clear structure, poor flow of
ideas, argument lacks supporting
evidence.
No effort is made to keep audience
engaged, audience cannot follow the
line of reasoning.
Little use of presentation aids, or the
presentation aids and material used are
i
elevant.
Information,
arguments and
evidence are presented
in a way that is not
always clear and
logical.
Attempts are made to
keep the audience
engaged, but not
always successful. Line
of reasoning is often
difficult to follow.
Presentation aids are
used more for effect
than relevance.
Information,
arguments and
evidence are well
presented, mostly
clear flow of ideas and
arguments.
The audience is mostly
engaged, line of
easoning is easy to
follow.
Effective use of
presentation aids.
Information,
arguments and
evidence are very
well presented,
the presentation is
logical, clear and
well supported by
evidence.
Engages the
audience,
demonstrates
cultural sensitivity.
Carefully and well
prepared
presentations aids
are used.
Expertly presented;
the presentation is
logical, persuasive,
and well supported
y evidence,
demonstrating a clear
flow of ideas and
arguments.
Engages and sustains
audience’s interest in
the topic,
demonstrates high
levels of cultural
sensitivity
Effective use of
diverse presentation
aids, including
graphics and multi-
media.