I have to peer review another students work . I will copy and paste it here with the instructions underneath.
Over the last decade, literature has suggested effective and functional teamwork in the health care industry leads to better patient health outcomes and prevents adverse events(Rosen, et al, XXXXXXXXXXAs an Enrolled Nurse who works in an Australian operating room, I believe teamwork is imperative in achieving efficient and safe surgeries. The strategies of how teamwork is improved and how it leads to better patient outcomes are explored through the analysis of multiple research materials. To locate evidence and research of this topic the PICo qualitative research framework has been used. This framework has been used as human experiences are explored rather than numeral/ statistical data. The PICo format for this research proposal is formatted below.
Population:the population of this research question are the members of the operating team. These include, surgeons, anaesthetists, anaesthetic techs, circulating, instrumental and anaesthetic nurses, post anaesthetic care unit (PACU) nurses, and nurse coordinators. The other essential member of this research proposal is the patient.
Interest:the key term of this research topic is teamwork and how/if it leads to better patient health outcomes is the interest. The journal articles analysed in answering this research proposal have been published in the last decade. The analysed literatures have been published and citied by the credible resources of SpringerLink and IntechOpen.
Context/setting:the setting of this research question is specific to the operating theatre/room but is not specific to evidence provided by a certain country. The research demonstrated could and should be implemented within any Australian operating theatres.
The article written byWeller and Boyd, (2014), explores how teamwork within the operating room contributes to beneficial and positive health outcomes(Weller & Boyd, 2014). The article firstly describes how teamwork is imperative within the operating room, and furthermore explores multiple improvement strategies. The authors outline how the use and creation of safety checklists, regular training sessions with all operating members, and how regular team meetings can improve teamwork with an in-depth analysis(Weller & Boyd, 2014). Limitations of this article are the lack of measuring tools they had incorporated, and the answer of how it does lead to better health outcomes is not clearly expressed. In conclusion, the article had proposed strong arguments in describing how teamwork can be improved with an in-depth analysis of multiple strategies(Weller & Boyd, 2014).
Ramadanov, (2020),had taken a different approach thanWeller and Boyd (2014),by discussing teamwork in multiple hospital settings (e.g. wards, ED, HDU etc.). A discussion of the use of different measuring tools to assess teamwork within both the operating room and the ward is explored. The mentioned measuring tools suggested communication errors, and cultural/hierarchical barriers negatively influence the degree of teamwork within the operating room and other hospital settings(Ramadanov, 2020). Regarding this topic, the article is purely not specific to operating theatres and this is demonstrated as a limitation. The in-depth information regarding communication, knowledge, and team member’s relationships are all aspects in which contribute to the degree of teamwork within the operating room(Ramadanov, 2020). In conclusion, the in-depth information and analysis has answered the question of how teamwork does lead to better patient health outcomes and the article is demonstrated to be informative
this is the instructions
Criteria of peer reply post [post 2]:
- Responds to a peer and provides feedback on the student's healthcare topic and research question supported by literature.
- Briefly clarify why you choose this health issue to respond to.
- Use two articles [different from peer’s ones] to discuss the health issue. Recent articles within the
last 5 years last 10 years should be included, from 2017 2012 and onward. - Conclusion and future recommendations.