Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

I. Aggregate and Entity Theories of Partnership Taxation. II. Taxing Partnership Operations. A. Partnership Level Determination of Tax Results. B. Partnership Taxable Income. C. The Partner’s Basis....

1 answer below »
I. Aggregate and Entity Theories of Partnership Taxation.
II. Taxing Partnership Operations.
A. Partnership Level Determination of Tax Results.
B. Partnership Taxable Income.
C. The Partner’s Basis.
D. Partnership Distributions.
E. Example.
AGGREGATE AND ENTITY THEORIES OF PARTNESHIP TAXATION
A recurring issue throughout Subchapter K is whether a partnership is treated for tax purposes as an aggregate of its individual partners or an entity separate and apart from its partners. The Code does not exclusively use either approach. Partnerships are treated as entities for some tax purposes and aggregates for others. For example, partnership income is taxed directly to its partners under an aggregate theory. At other times, the Code blends the two theories and adopts a modified aggregate or entity approach to determine the tax results to the partners.
TAXING PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONS
Partnership Level Determination of Tax Results
A partnership is not technically a taxpayer. Its primary function for tax purposes is to facilitate the computation of each partner’s share of the venture’s profit or loss. This is primarily an accounting function: once income or loss from partnership operations is calculated, those amounts are passed through to the partners who are responsible for reporting their shares on their own tax returns.
Because it is the partnership, not the individual partners, that is carrying on the enterprise, it would be unduly cumbersome to require each of the partners to keep her own set of books for the enterprise’s activities. This would require each partner to account for the enterprise’s accounts receivables, cost-of-goods-sold, depreciation, etc. This could certainly become an accounting, as well as an auditing, nightmare. For these reasons, a partnership must adopt a taxable year, choose a method of accounting, and make certain elections just as if it were a taxpayer. The partnership is also required to compute its taxable income and to file an information return (Form 1065), that informs the IRS and the partners about the entity’s operations. At the same time the partnership provides each partner with a statement (Form K-1) which informs them of their respective shares of the income and deduction incurred at the partnership level. This process enables the partners to report their shares of partnership income, and also allows the IRS to audit the operations of the enterprise as a whole.
Partnership Taxable Income
A partnership computes its taxable income in the same manner as an individual except it is not permitted certain deductions, such as personal exemptions, medical expenses, alimony and expenses for the production or collection of income. A partnership is not permitted a net operating loss deduction because a partnership’s losses pass through to its partners.
The characterization of tax items is determined at the partnership level. The partnership must separately state certain items to preserve their unique character as they pass through to the partners. This enables the partners to combine the passed through items with their non-partnership tax items when computing tax liability. The tax items required to be separately stated include (but are not limited to): short-term capital gains and losses, long-term capital gains and losses, charitable contributions, and dividends taxed as net capital gain.
Example
Abby and Bob are equal partners in the AB partnership. During December 2009, each partner received a Schedule K-1 showing the following results of partnership operations from October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009.
Ordinary income from business activities
(partnership taxable income)
$42,300
Dividend income $2,300
Net long-term capital loss ($4,000)
Investment interest expense ($5,500)
Charitable contributions ($1,900)

Abby will include her $42,300 share of ordinary business income on Schedule E; her $2,300 share of dividend income on Schedule B, and her share of the long-term capital loss on Schedule D of her 2009 Form 1040.
Per §163(d), Abby's $5,500 share of investment interest expense is deductible only to the extent of her net investment income for 2009. The deductible portion of the interest expense and Abby's share $1,900 share of the charitable contribution must be reported as itemized deductions on Schedule A, Form 1040.

The Partner’s Basis
A partner’s basis in his or her partnership interest is a crucial element in partnership taxation. When a partner makes a contribution to a partnership or purchases a partnership interest, he or she establishes a beginning basis. Because partners can be personally liable for partnership debts, a partner’s basis in his or her partnership interest is increased by his or her share of any partnership liabilities. Accordingly, each partner’s basis fluctuates as the partnership borrows and repays loans or increases and decreases its accounts payable. In addition, a partner’s basis in his or her partnership interest is increased by the partner’s share of partnership income and decreased by his or her share of partnership losses. Because a partner’s basis in his or her partnership interest can never be negative, the basis serves as one limit on the amount of deductible partnership losses.
Partnership Distributions
When a partnership makes a current distribution, the distribution generally is tax-free to the partners because it represents the receipt of earnings that already have been taxed to the partners and that have increased the partners’ bases in their partnership interests. Subsequent distributions reduce a partner’s basis in his or her partnership interest. If a cash distribution is so large, however, that it exceeds a partner’s basis in his or her partnership interest, the partner recognizes gain equal to the amount of the excess.
Additional Note
The increase in a partner’s basis for earnings prevents double taxation of those earnings upon a subsequent distribution, sale of the partnership interest, or liquidation of the partnership.

When the partnership goes out of business or when a partner withdraws from the partnership, the partnership makes liquidating distributions to the partner. Like current distributions, these distributions cause the partner to recognize gain only if the cash received exceeds the partner’s basis in his or her partnership interest. A partner may recognize loss if he or she receives only cash, inventory, and unrealized receivables in complete liquidation of his or her partnership interest.
Example
LES HICKS, Petitioner
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
UNITED STATES TAX COURT
Filed May 7, 2009
BACKGROUND
II. PHHA
PHHA is a Texas limited liability company. PHHA reports its operations for Federal income tax purposes as if it were a partnership and on the basis of a calendar year. Taxpayer owned a 10-percent interest in PHHA. An unrelated individual owned the remaining 90-percent interest.
PHHA issued taxpayer a Schedule K-1, Partner's Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc., for 2005. The Schedule K-1 reported that taxpayer's share of PHHA's ordinary business income for 2005 was $54,819. Taxpayer did not receive any actual distributions from PHHA during 2005.
III. 2005 Tax Return
Taxpayer filed a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2005 using the filing status of "Single". Taxpayer did not report on that return, or otherwise include in his gross income for 2005, any of the $54,819 PHHA reported to him.
IV. IRS's Determination
IRS determined in the notice of deficiency that taxpayer's gross income for 2005 included the $54,819 and increased taxpayer's gross income accordingly.
DISCUSSION
I. Income Tax Deficiency
B. Distributive Share of PHHA Income
Taxpayer argues that the $54,819 is not taxable to him in 2005 because he did not receive any actual distributions from PHHA during that year. We disagree with taxpayer's argument that the $54,819 is not taxable to him in 2005. A partner such as taxpayer must take into account his distributive share of each item of partnership income even if no partnership income is actually distributed to him during the year to which the distributive share relates. See sec. 702(a).
Answered Same Day Dec 23, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 23 2021
126 Votes
QUES: Refundable credits are those that result in a payment to the taxpayer even when the amount of the credit (or credits) exceeds the taxpayer’s tax liability
ACC 317: ADVANCED FEDERAL TAXATION (SPRING 2012)
1. Question (5 points): Alpha Corporation, Beta Corporation, and Cappa Corporation form the ABC Partnership. Alpha owns 40% of the partnership profits and capital, and uses a June 30 tax year. Beta owns 30% of partnership profits and capital and also uses a June 30 tax year. Cappa owns 30% of partnership profits and capital and uses a September 30 tax year. What tax year must the ABC Partnership adopt?
Solution
Under §706(b)(1)(B) the priority rules for determining a partnerships required taxable year is specified.
The First Tier specifies that where the partnership has one or more partners owning more than 50% interest in profits and capital and has the same taxable year, then the partnership must adopt that taxable year.
Applying the First Tier rule in the given scenario,
    Partne
    Interest in Profits
    Taxable Yea
    Alpha Corp.
    40%
    June 30
    Beta Corp.
    30%
    June 30
    Cappa Corp.
    30%
    September 30
Here we can see that Alpha Corp and Beta Corp (2 Partners) in combination have more than 50% of interest in profits (30% + 40% = 70% > 50%) and has the same taxable year i.e. June 30. Hence, the ABC Partnership following the First Tier rule will adopt June 30 as the required taxable year under §706(b)(1)(B)
2. Question (5 points)
: Argo Corporation, which uses a June 30 tax year, forms an equal partnership with Bango Corporation, which uses a July 31 tax year. What tax year must the partnership adopt?
Solution
In the above solutions and using the rules under the §706(b)(1)(B), we cannot apply the First and Second Tier and derive the taxable year because both the partners own 50% in the partnership and have different taxable year and also all of the principal partners have different taxable year.
Therefore, we will apply the Third Tier aggregating the total defe
al which states that defe
al for each partner is simply the product of number of months the defe
al times that partners profits interest. In this, we take the partnership year in which the aggregate defe
al is least.
Assuming the adoption of Argo Corp’s June 30 tax yea
    Partner
    Taxable yea
    Interest in Profits
    Months of Defe
al
    Interest * Defe
al
    Argo Corp
    June 30
    50%
    0
    0 (50% * 0)
    Bango Corp.
    July 31
    50%
    1
    0.5 (50% * 1)
    Aggregate Defe
al
    0.5
Assuming the adoption of Bango Corp’s July 31 tax yea
    Partner
    Taxable yea
    Interest in Profits
    Months of Defe
al
    Interest * Defe
al
    Bango Corp
    July 31
    50%
    0
    0 (50% * 0)
    Argo Corp.
    June 30
    50%
    11
    5.5 (50% * 11)
    Aggregate Defe
al
    5.5
Thus, the partnership must adopt the taxable year of June 30 (Argo Corp.) because it results in the least aggregate defe
al of 0.5
3. Facts (8 points): Reia and Long to go into business together to make action films such as National Treasure 5: The Ghosts of Foggy Bottom. They form the RL Partnership. Long contributes $50,000 cash and a parcel of land with a fair market value of $50,000 and an adjusted basis of $20,000, while Reia contributes $100,000 cash. Long and Reia agree to comply with The Big Three, to share all profits and losses equally, and to use the traditional method in making §704(c) allocations. RL sells the parcel of land for $70,000.
a. Question (4 points): What are RL's tax gain (if any) and book gain (if any) on the sale of
the land?
Solution
There would not be any gain recognized by RL in the form of Tax Gain or Book Gain. The reason behind this is that the land contributed by Reia has a FMV of $50,000 whereas its adjusted basis is $20,000 only. This implies in the books of RL, the land will be recognized at a value of $50,000 whereas for tax purposes the land will be recognized at $20,000 (§723). As per the §704(c) it is stated that the land when sold and any gain arising from the same will be recognized and allocated to the co
esponding partner i.e. REIA.
. Question (4 points): How are the tax gain (if any) and book gain (if any) allocated
etween Long and Reia?
The tax gains and the book gains in the given problem will be adjusted accordingly to follow the method as mentioned in the partnership and which best contributes to the existing partners. The method says that
Step 1: Book gains are allocated per the partnership agreement.
Step 2: Allocate the tax gain (equal in amount to book gain) first to the non-contributing partner to maintain equality between the book and tax capital accounts.
Step 3: Remaining tax gain is allocated to the contributing partner.
Hence, following the above method, the tax gains will first be allocated to REIA i.e. $50,000 - $20,000 = $30,000 in order to remove the disparity in her tax and capital book accounts. After the allocation is done, her book capital...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here