Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

HI5028 TAXATION T2, 2013 ASSIGNMENT 1 Due date: Friday 30 th August Instructions: This assignment is to be submitted by the due date in both soft-copy (Safeassign – Bb) and hard copy. The assignment...

1 answer below »

HI5028 TAXATION
T2, 2013 ASSIGNMENT 1
Due date: Friday 30th August
Instructions:
This assignment is to be submitted by the due date in both soft-copy (Safeassign – Bb) and hard copy.
The assignment is to be submitted in accordance with assessment policy stated in the Subject Outline and Student Handbook
It is the responsibility of the student submitting the work to ensure that the work is in fact his/her own work. Ensure that when incorporating the works of others into your submission that it appropriately acknowledged.
Maximum marks: 20 (20%)
Assignment 1: You should attempt both parts to this assignment
Note: you should incorporate all sections of the various Acts/regulations where appropriate.
Part 1: Case study
Janet (taxpayer) residing in Australia is named as the sole beneficiary of a property (1.85 hectares) with a large homestead as a result of the death of a relative on 7/10/2009. The property is not used for commercial purposes and at the date of death, the property was valued at $1.45million. Settlement took place on 21/12/2009. After moving into the homestead shortly after taking ownership, she planned to take a one-year trip which she had been planning for some time in late 2010. The taxpayer felt that the homestead was far too large for her (she is single), applied to the ATO for an exemption for ABN registration and some fourteen months later (16/2/2011), she obtained council approval to subdivide the property into three, with the intention of building three units, one she will take up as her own residence, the other two will be sold. Work commenced some weeks after approval and on 12th December that same year, the taxpayer returned and moved into one of the apartments. The other two were sold in March/April in 2012, one selling for $1.35m (24/3/2012), the other for $1.45m (9/4/2012).
You are to consider the CGT implications both from the relevant sections (ITAA), rulings, etc. and from the values (if/where applicable). Assume that the blocks are subdivided equally. For each determination that you make, you should clarify. You should also clarify what Capital Gains and CGT is in your answer (15 marks)
Part 2: Question
Explain using examples and relevant sections of the act, what the differences between Ordinary Income and Statutory income are. Use your own examples (not from MTG or Barkoczy text) (5 marks)
Answered Same Day Dec 24, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 24 2021
123 Votes
HI5028 TAXATION
T2, 2013 ASSIGNMENT 1
Solution 1
Facts of the case:
In this case Janet is the taxpayer who is residing in Australia. She on the account of death of her
elative is named as a sole beneficiary of her property of 1.85 hectares with a large homestead on
7/10/2009. The said property inherited by her is used solely for residential purposes and not for
commercial purposes. The value of the property at the time of death of the past owner is $ 1.45
million. The official settlement of the property took place after approximately two and half
months on 21/12/2009. Thereafter moving in the homestead shortly after taking the ownership
and possession she decided a one year trip which was being planned by her for a long time in
later part of 2010. The taxpayer later after moving in her property realized that it was really big
for her as she was single, so she applied to the ATO for an exemption for ABN registration and
later on 16/2/2011 nearly after fourteen months, and the approval was then obtained by her from
the council. She build three units with the intention of keeping one to herself and selling two then
after, and the work was commenced after a few weeks of approval obtained by her, and finally
the taxpayer (Janet) moved in one of the units constructed by her and she then sold the other two
units which were constructed by her for the purpose of sale, one on 24/3/2012 for $ 1.35 million
and the other for 1.45 million on 9/4/2012. The land for the construction of the property was
divided in three equal parts.
We in this case are required to calculate the CGT implications keeping in mind both the ITAA
ulings etc. as well as values wherever applicable.
As per the provisions, inheriting a property is exempt from capital gain tax. But further selling
the same property inherited by the tax payer shall be chargeable to capital gain tax.
In the given case Janet inherited a property from her relative as a result on 7/10/2009. The
property not being used for commercial purpose was valued at $1.45 million. She then divided
the property in three parts, keeping 1 to herself for her residential purpose and selling the other 2
for $1.35 million and $1.45 million. We in the following problem are required to calculate the
capital gain for her that shall be minimal as according to the fence of law. As it is clear in the
case study that property shall not fall under other capital gain because it is clearly held for more
than 12 months, so the we have to make an assumption on weather the asset was purchased
efore 11.45 am on 21
st
September 1999 or after that for the purpose of indexation.
In the given case it shall be noted that capital gain tax is not attracted merely by subdividing the
whole property in blocks but it shall be attracted to capital gain tax only if it sold. So in this case
the capital gain tax shall be attracted during the sale of the asset.
Case1)
It is assumed that the asset was acquired by the deceased after 11.45 am of 21
st
September, 1999,
and it is clear from the question that Janet have held the asset for more than 12 months before
selling it, than capital gain shall be calculated by reducing the cost of the property including any
further capital expenditure incu
ed on property from proceeds of the property. The capital gain
so calculated here shall be straightaway reduced by 50%.
Proceeds: $2.80 million ($1.35 million and $1.45 million)
Cost of the land: $0.9667 million (1.45*2/3)
Capital gain: $1.83 million
Reduce Capital Gain by 50%
Therefore capital gain in this case is $0.915 million
Case2)
It is assumed that the asset was acquired by the deceased before 11.45 am of 21
st
September,
1999 for the purpose of indexation and the holding period of the property is more than 12
months.
Formula:
Indexation Factor = CPI for the quarter ending 30
th
September / CPI for the quarter in which
expenditure was incu
ed. Since in the given case the land is inherited by the Janet and it is hard
to find and almost impossible to figure out the quarter in course of which the cost was incu
ed
y the previous owner, we shall assume that the expenditure was incu
ed during last quarter
only
Proceeds $2.80 million
Cost of the land $0.97 million (1.45*2/3)
Indexed cost of land (amount in million)
For the land sold in the quarter ending March 31
st
2012 June 30
th
, 2012
Indexation factor: 68.7 68.7
CPI for 30
th
September, 1999 123.4 123.4
Therefore indexed cost of the land 0.48 * 123.4/68.7 ...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here