Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

CHAPTER 1 Chapter 4 Residence and source  2018 Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Jonathan Teoh, Monash University . General principles A resident of Australia for tax...

1 answer below »

CHAPTER 1
Chapter 4
Residence and source
 2018 Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Jonathan Teoh, Monash University
.
General principles
A resident of Australia for tax purposes will be taxed on income from all sources:
See, s XXXXXXXXXXIncome Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA97).
A foreign resident for tax purposes will be taxed on income from Australian sources only:
See, s XXXXXXXXXXITAA97.
PoTL 2018 paragraphs [4.10] – [4.20]
Tax residency: impact on individual taxpayers
Individual tax rates:
Differ depending on whether the individual tax payer is a resident for tax purposes or a foreign resident.
Broadly, a foreign resident does not receive the benefit of the tax-free threshold.
Foreign residents do not have access to many personal tax offsets.
Foreign residents are not liable for the Medicare levy.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.30]
Overall guide:
When is a taxpayer a tax resident of Australia?
PoTL 2018 paragraphs [4.10], [4.40]
Is the taxpayer a resident of Australia?
Individual
4 tests of residence:
1. Ordinary concepts;
2. Domicile;
3. 183-day test; o
4. Superannuation test
Company
3 tests of residence:
1. Place of incorporation;
2. Central management
and control; o
3. Controlling shareholders
Residency tests (overview): individuals
Only one out of four tests needs to be satisfied for an individual to be considered a tax resident of Australia:
See, definition of a resident in s 6(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA36).
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.50]
1
Resides test
2
Domicile test
3
183-day test
4
Superannuation test
Resides test
Known as the “residence according to ordinary concepts” test.
The term “resides” is not defined in statute and its ordinary meaning is ascertained from a dictionary, for example:
“to dwell permanently or for a considerable time” (Macquarie Dictionary).
Ultimately, the determination of tax residency rests on a question of fact and degree: Miller v FCT (1946).
PoTL 2018 paragraphs [4.60] – [4.70]
Resides test:
Factors considered by the courts
Time physically spent in Australia.
If the person is a visitor, the frequency, regularity and duration of visits: IRC v Lysaght [1928].
Purpose of the visits to Australia and a
oad.
The maintenance of a place of abode in Australia for the taxpayer’s use.
The person’s family, business and social ties: Levene v IRC [1928].
The person’s nationality may be considered for borderline cases.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.80]
Resides test:
The Commissioner of Taxation’s view
The Commissioner places emphasis on:
Intention or purpose of presence
Family and business or employment ties
Maintenance and location of assets
Social and living a
angements.
In addition to the above behavioural characteristics of the taxpayer, the Commissioner considers there must be sufficient time elapsed to demonstrate continuity, routine or habit.
See, Tax Ruling 98/17.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.90]
Domicile test
Under the domicile test, an individual is a resident of Australia if his or her domicile is in Australia, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the person has a permanent place of abode outside Australia.
‘Domicile’ is determined according to the Domicile Act 1982:
Domicile of origin at birth
Domicile of choice: country where the taxpayer intends to make their home indefinitely.
Generally applies to individuals moving overseas (eg, usually as a work posting), but not changing their domicile.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.100]
Domicile test:
“permanent place of abode outside Australia”
The domicile test does not apply when the individual can demonstrate that he or she does not have a “permanent place of abode outside Australia”.
In Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Applegate:
Taxpayer moved to Vila to establish an office of the Sydney law firm in XXXXXXXXXXStayed there for two years but returned on one occasion when his wife had a baby. The taxpayer became ill in 1973 and returned to Australia.
Commissioner of Taxation argued that this domicile was Australian that he had not satisfied the requirement that his “permanent place of abode was outside Australia”.
High Court held that permanent does not mean “forever” and is assessed objectively each year.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.110]
Domicile test:
The Commissioner of Taxation’s view
The Commissioner considers various factors in Ruling IT 2650 to ascertain whether a taxpayer has a “permanent place of abode outside Australia”. Factors include:
Intended and actual length of stay in the overseas country;
Intentions to stay in the overseas country permanently or temporarily;
Location of established home;
Duration and continuity of taxpayer’s presence in overseas country;
Durability of Australian associations (eg, place of education of taxpayer’s children).
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.120]
183-day test
Under the 183-day test, an individual is a tax resident of Australia when his or her physical presence in Australia, continuously or intermittently, is for more than one-half of the income year.
Exceptions:
If the Commissioner is satisfied that the individual’s usual place of abode is outside Australia; and
The individual does not intend to take up residence in Australia.
Working holiday visa holder who was in Australia for more than 183 days was not a resident as their “usual place of abode was outside Australia”: Re Koustrup v FCT (2015)
Special rules apply to working holiday makers, see slide 16.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.130]
Superannuation test
Applies in relation to Commonwealth superannuation funds.
Under the superannuation test, the member of a Commonwealth superannuation fund (ie, Commonwealth public servants) and the member’s family are deemed to be tax residents of Australia.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.140]
Period of residence
A person may be resident for a whole or part year, depending on the residency test used:
Tax free threshold in the individual progressive income tax rates is pro-rated for the residency period.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.145]
    Test    Residency Period
    Resides (ordinary concepts)    Commences from the date when the person first resides in Australia
    Domicile    Resident for the days when in Australia
    183-day test    Taken to be a resident for the whole yea
Temporary residents – individuals (Div 768)
Temporary residents are provided with tax relief, even if they meet a residency test:
Most foreign sourced income is not taxed in Australia
Pay tax at the Australian resident income tax rates
Capital gains arising from disposal of assets not having necessary connection with Australia disregarded
From 8 May 2012: no longer entitled to the 50% CGT discount
From 9 May 2017: no longer access the CGT main residence exemption (existing properties grandfathered until 30 June 2019)
Taxpayers are temporary residents if:
they hold a temporary visa under the Migration Act 1958
they or their spouse is not an Australian resident within the meaning of the Social Security Act 1991.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.150]
15
Working holiday makers
“Backpacker tax”.
A taxpayer is defined as a working holiday maker if they are in Australia under the following visa categories:
417 (working holiday)
562 (work and holiday).
Special income tax rates apply:
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.155]
    Threshold    Rate
    $0 - $37,000    15%
    $37,000 +    At ordinary rates
Residency tests (overview): companies
Only one out of three tests needs to be satisfied for a company to be considered a tax resident of Australia:
See, definition of a resident in s 6(1) ITAA36.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.170]
1
Place of incorporation test
2
Central management and control test
3
Controlling shareholders test
Place of incorporation test
A company that is incorporated in Australia under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is automatically a tax resident of Australia, regardless of any other factors.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.180]
Central management and control test
A company is a resident of Australia if it:
Following Bywater Investments Limited & Ors v Commissioner of Taxation (2016) :
Location of a company’s central management and control is a question of fact and degree
No general presumption that the location is where the directors meet or where board meetings take place.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.190]
Ca
ies on business in Australia
Central management & control in Australia
Resident of Australia
(s 6(1) ITAA36)
Central management and control test:
Commissioner’s interpretation of Bywate
The Commissioner has determined in Draft Ruling TR 2017/D2 the relevant factual matters for consideration are as follows:
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.200]
1
Does the company ca
y on business in Australia?
If a business has its central management and control in Australia, it will be ca
ying on a business in Australia
2
What does central management and control mean?
Determine location of where high-level decisions that set the company’s policies, direction of its operations and type of transactions it will enter.
3
Who exercises central management and control?
4
Where is central management control exercised?
Determine in reality who controls and directs the company (not the legal power or authority to control)
Determine in reality where decisions are made (not where merely recorded or formalised)
Controlling shareholders test
Two-limb test:
Voting power is controlled by shareholders who are residents of Australia (that is, more than 50% of the voting power at general meetings); and
The company is ca
ying on business in Australia (same as the first limb of the central management and control test).
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.210]
Source of income:
Overview
If an taxpayer is a foreign resident, the taxpayer is taxed only taxed on ordinary and statutory income sourced in Australia, unless deemed assessable income on some other basis.
Question of source has been described as “something which a practical man would regard as a real source of income” and a “practical, hard matter of fact”: Nathan v FCT (1918).
Source rules based on a combination of common law principles and statutory provisions.
Practically, it requires classification of income into different classes to determine source.
PoTL 2018 paragraph [4.230]
Source of income:
Categories of income
Sale of goods (trading stock):
Generally, the place where the trading activities take place.
Sale of property other than trading stock:
For real property, the place where the property is located.
Services:
Generally, the place where the performance of services occurs: FCT v French (1957); FCT v Efstathakis (1979).
PoTL 2018 paragraphs [4.240] – [4.260]
Source of income:
Categories of income (continued)
Interest:
Emphasis on the place where the contract for the loan was made and where the money was advanced: Spotless Services v FCT (1993).
Dividends:
The place where the company derived its profits: Esquire Nominees Ltd v FCT (1973).
Royalties:
The place where the location of the industrial or intellectual property from which the royalty flows.
PoTL 2018 paragraphs [4.270] – [4.290]
Answered Same Day Sep 20, 2020

Solution

Pulkit answered on Sep 27 2020
152 Votes
QUESTION 1
FACTS
Edward was working as an audit junior in an accounting firm in Sydney and lived with his parents. After two years he was promoted and posted to Singapore for a period of two years.  There he lived in a share apartment and adapted to the new lifestyle in Singapore. After two years he returned to Australia after travelling to Europe. On his return he lived in a rented house.
ISSUE
Whether is a tax resident of Australia when he was away from Australia in Sydney.  
RELEVANT LAW
As per section 6-5(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 a resident of Australia for tax purposes will be taxed on income from all sources and as per section 6-5(3) of ITAA 1997 a foreign resident for tax purposes will be taxed on income from Australian sources only.
As per the ITAA 1997 an individual’s residency will be determined on the basis of the four tests, if an individual resident as per any one test also will be resident for tax purpose, the four test are explained below:
1. RESIDES TEST: If an individual resides that is live in Australia through his physical presence then the same is regarded as a resident of Australia. The following factors decides the residency of individual:
· He should be physically present in Australia,
· His social and family ties lies are in Australia as stated in Levene v IRC [1928]
· His intention or the purpose of living is to permanently reside in Australia.
2. DOMICLE TEST: Under the domicile test, an individual is a resident of Australia if his or her place of origin is in Australia until and unless there exist evidence as to the existence of permanent place of living outside Australia. The domicile of an individual is determined as per the Domicile Act 1982:
· Place of origin at birth
· Place that is the country where the taxpayer intends to make their home indefinitely.
The following factors as defined under Ruling IT 2650 helps in finding whether the permanent place of living of an individual is outside Australia:
· The length of stay in the other country;
· Intentions to stay whether permanently or temporarily;
· Location of established home;
· Duration and continuity of stay in another country;
3. 183 DAYS TEST: As per this test an individual is a resident of Australia when he is physically present in Australia either on continuous basis or otherwise, is present for more than one-half of the income year.
The following are the exceptions in this regard:
· The individual’s usual place of residence and living is outside Australia
· The individual does not have any intention to reside in Australia.
· As laid down in the case of Re Koustrup v FCT (2015) working holiday visa holder though in Australia for more than 183 days not considered as a resident.
4. SUPERANNUATION TEST: This test applies to the member of a Commonwealth superannuation fund.
APPLICABILITY
By applying the rules as stated above in the case of Edward it can be outlined as follows:
1. Resides Test: For the two years period he was not physically present in Australia and was in Singapore so as per the residency test he is not a resident for the two years.
2. Domicile Test: Edward used to live in Sydney with his parents before taking up the job in Singapore. And after two years are travelling in Europe he returned to Australia. When he moved to Singapore he was not intended to return to Australia as per his not surety as to return to Australia. In Singapore he resided in a share apartment and also adopted the culture and living in Singapore with an aim to not to return to Australia. His step of closing the Australian Bank account also indicates his intention of not returning to Australia. He also applied for work visa in Singapore as he was not sure of his returning to Australia.
All these points in relation to Edward proves though his parents lived in Sydney for two years when he lived in Singapore but as his intention when moving to Singapore were not to return to Australia fails the domicile test and thus he is not a resident of Australia as per this test also .
3. 183 days test: When Edward went to Singapore he did not come to Australia for a visit also thus the question of applying 183 days test does not come. And he is not a resident as per this test also as he was not physically present in Australia for more than an income year whether on continuous basis or otherwise.
4. Superannuation test is not applicable in the case of Edward.
As per the case law Koitaki Para Ru
er Estates Limited v FC of T (1941) it was laid down that the place of residence of an individual is determined according to the reference to the place where he eats and sleep and is his permanent place of living and the residential status cannot be judged by the situation of some business or property which he is ca
ying on or owns. The place of living or residence include hotels or a yacht or some other place of living.
Physical presence and intention go hand in hand in most of the cases. This means that once a person has established his residence at a particular place whether voluntarily or involuntarily the person does not cease to be a...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here