Hi, In this assignment we need to apply the ACT/LAW that is current and valid in western australia. So please be careful while you selecting the act. Guardianship and administration act 1990 wa is the...

NURS3002 INQUIRY FOR COMPLEX CARE
CASE STUDY QUESTIONS:
1. Identify two most relevant and significant Acts or Laws relevant to the case study that guide care of this patient. Ensure you focus on the cu
ent time frame and situation and that identified legislation is cu
ent and valid in Western Australia.
As per the case study of Mr. Ethan, the Acts that stand most relevant to guide the care of this patient are:
· Health Services Act 2016 (WA)
· Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA)
2. Choose one of the Acts or Laws you have identified above and explain why and how it applies to Mr Ethan Watson’s cu
ent care and situation. Ensure the Act/Law itself is used to discuss and analyse its relevance and significance.
Guardianship and Administration Act 1990(WA) control the considerate care for Ethan. As this Act expresses that the closest relative or individual dependable can settle on a treatment choice in the interest of the patient when patient is unequipped for settling on treatment choice to get the health outcomes. For the cu
ent case study, Ethan isn't in a perspective because of his ailment and not consistent with the blood transfusion which is essential to forestall the danger of his life. Accordingly, this Act direct the consideration by giving power to closest relative to settle on a substantial choice to save his life.
The Part 9C Division 2 s 110ZD subsection (1) of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA) expresses that the concerned patient can settle on the treatment choice in regard of the treatment when the patient can't give the legitimate judgment with respect to treatment given. For Ethan's situation, his present condition shows that he is restoratively ill suited and is unequipped for making a legitimate judgment seeing his treatment as confirmed by his low GCS and befuddled status. Further, Part 9C division 2 s 110ZD subsection 2 (a) and (b) expresses that the dependable individual of the patient who is of full lawful limit and is sensibly accessible can settle on the regarded treatment choice for the benefit of the patient. Essentially, Part 9C division 2 s 110ZD subsection 4(a) states that the patient's closest family members, spouse can be the priority to choose with deference for the treatment. For Ethan's situation, his wife who is additionally his next of kin is introduced in the medical clinic at a time who can give therapy choices to Ethan to acquire the best wellbeing results (Western Australian Legislation, 2020).
Under WA Health Consent to Treatment Policy, if the individual is 18 years or above and unequipped for settling on a treatment choice, the medical care provider should talk with the individual mindful to settle on a therapy choice in the interest of the patient. Ethan is a grown-up and has the legitimate ability to decline to treatment in regards to blood transfusion in any case,...