hi

2
Gemma
In the vase analysis given, the following requirements and their subsections are not met:
1. Norm 1, subsections, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 respectively as well as Norm 3.3 (a) and (d) and 6, respectively. (a) (a), (b). These principles are subject to maintaining personal dignity and preference, to providing quality of treatment in the organizational environment, and at the same time, organizations must be open to suggestions and input. In order not to compromise the wishes and desires of patients, as well as their families or friends, they should also have constructive and strong compliance management.
2. In Gemma's case study, it is her personal preference to have a transgender woman's distinct sexual identity. Therefore, based on her decision, she holds the right to be valued. She cannot be mocked under any circumstances, particularly by staff members who joke about her right outside her room. Secondly, i
espective of her sexual orientation, she has the right to access all the health care on time. Around the same time, the nursing coordinator must investigate the matter in the event of allegations, instead of trusting in the previous record of a nurse taking care of Gemma.
3. Gemma should have been well attended by the staff as per the case study, ensuring that she is made to understand that she is inferior to others and she has made a mistake by possessing unique sexual identity without any point of concern. The nursing coordinator should also have prosecuted the matter at the administrative level so that justice should enter Gemma. And by perceiving that one of her caretakers has a fine service record should she not perform her duties. In addition, because of her misinterpretation of faith in the religious system, which should not obstruct what Gemma deserves at the heart, she is problematic.
Observation
Many older adults who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) are concerned that they will not have the family and social care help they will need when they get older. They are also wo
ied that, in long-term care facilities, they will face discrimination or abuse. These are the results of "Maintaining Dignity: Recognizing and Reacting to the Issues Facing Older LGBT Americans," a recent AARP study of LGBT adults aged 45-plus. In a long-term care climate, LGBT adults are still wo
ied about how they may be handled. More than 60 percent of respondents said that they wo
y that they will be denied or receive limited treatment, and they also feel that they may be at risk of negligence, violence, or ve
al or physical harassment. Most are uncomfortable about acceptance and think that they would be pressured to conceal or reject their LGBT identity by joining long-term care (Sackett, 2018). Gemma’s case reveals that she is in much need to be appreciated for what she has chosen as her lifestyle; the problem with common Australian context is...