Solution
David answered on
Dec 21 2021
1. For a set S, with , ,X Y S we define \X Y X Y X Y and .X Y X Y We
wish to determine whether P S is a ring or a field with these two operations.
In order for P S to be a ring, it must be an abelian group with respect to addition, a
associative with respect to multiplication, and distributive with respect to addition and
multiplication.
It is useful to define X Y in terms of complementary sets. For a subset X of S, we let
\ .X S X Then we have \X Y X Y for all subsets X and Y of S. Thus we have
\
.
X Y
X Y X Y
X Y X Y
X Y X Y
Now we check whether P S satisfies the axioms of a ring. First we check whether it is
commutative with respect to addition. We have
,
X Y
X Y
Y X
Y X
whence P S is commutative with respect to addition.
Next we check whether P S is associative with respect to addition. We have
.
X Y Z
X Y X Y Z
X Y X Y Z X Y X Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z X Y X Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z X Y X Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z
X X Z X Y Z X Y Z Y Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z Z X Y Z X Y Z Z
X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
We also have
.
X Y Z
Y Z X
Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X
X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
X Y Z
Thus we see that P S is associative with respect to addition.
Next we check whether P S has an additive identity element, 0. We claim that 0.
To see this, note that
0
.
X
X X
X X S
X S
X
Thus we see that P S has an additive identity element. Thus, P S is an abelian group
with respect to addition.
Next we check whether P S is associative with respect to multiplication. We have
.
X Y Z
X Y Z
X Y Z
X Y Z
Thus we see that P S is associative with respect to multiplication.
Finally we must check whether P S satisfies the two distributive properties. We have
.
X Y Z
X Y Z
X Y Z Y Z
X Y X Z Y Z
X Y Y Z X Z Y Z
X Y Y X Y Z X Y Z X Z Z
X Y Z X Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z
We also have
.
X Y X Z
X Y X Z
X Y X Z X Y X Z
X Y X Z X Y X Z
X Y X Z X Y Z
X X Y X X Z X Y Y X Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z
X Y Z X Y Z
X Y Z
Thus we see that P S satisfies the first distributive property.
We also have
,
X Y
X Y
Y X
Y X
whence P S is commutative with respect to multiplication.
Finally we have
,
X Y Z
Y Z X
Y X Z X
X Y X Z
whence P S satisfies the second distributive property as well. Thus we see that P S
is a ring.
Now in order for P S to be a field, it must also have a multiplicative identity element,
1, and every nonempty subset X of S must have a multiplicative inverse. First we check
whether P S has a multiplicative identity element.
We claim that 1.S To see this, note that for every subset X of S, we have
1
.
X
S X
X
Next we must check whether every nonempty element of P S has a multiplicative
inverse. Let X be a nontrivial nonempty subset of S (which only exists if # 2.S ) We
look for a subset Y of S such that 1.X Y But then we would have ,X Y S which is
impossible since X is a nontrivial subset of S. Thus we see that P S is not a field unless
S has cardinality 0 or 1.
2. We are given the sets
2
2 : , and : , .
a
R a b a b S a
a
We wish to show that R is a su
ing of R , S is a su
ing of 2 ,M and that R and S are
isomorphic.
To show that R is a su
ing of R , we must show that R is closed under addition and
multiplication (the other ring axioms follow from those of ). Let a, b, c, and d be
integers. Then we have
2 and 2 .a b R c d R
We also have
2 2
2
,
a b c d
a c b d
R
whence R is closed under addition.
Finally we have
2 2
2 2
,
a b c d
ac bd ad bc
R
whence R is also closed under multiplication and hence is a su
ing of R .
To show that S is a su
ing of 2 ,M we must show that S is also closed under addition
and multiplication. Let a, b, c, and d be integers. Then we have
2 2
and .
a b c d
A S B S
a d c
Now we have
2 2
2
,
a b c d
A B
a d c
a c b d
d a c
S
whence S is closed under addition. We also have
2 2
2 2
2
,
a b c d
AB
a d c
ac bd ad bc
ad bc ac bd
S
whence S is also closed under multiplication and hence is a su
ing of 2 .M
Finally we must show that R and S are isomorphic. Consider the map : R S defined
y
2
2 .
a
a
a
Now let 2 and 2.a b c d Then we have
2 2
2
2
2 2
2 2
.
a b c d
a c b d
a c b d
d a c
a b c d
a d c
a b c d
We also have
2 2
2 2
2 2
2
2 2
2 2
.
a b c d
ac bd ad bc
ac bd ad bc
ad bc ac bd
a b c d
a d c
a b c d
Thus we see that is a ring homomorphism.
To show that R and S are isomorphism, it suffices to show that is one-to-one and onto
and hence is a ring isomorphism. Suppose that 2 2 .a b c d Then we have
2 2
,
a b c d
a d c
...