Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Graph both the individual’s labor supply decision graph and the labor supply graph for the following situations. (The labor supply decision graph should assume a positive level of nonlabor income.) a....

1 answer below »
Graph both the individual’s labor supply decision graph and the labor supply graph for the following situations. (The labor supply decision graph should assume a positive level of nonlabor income.) a. An individual does not change her hours of labor supplied, regardless of the wage rate. b. An individual labor supply curve is backward-bending at higher levels of the wage, but positively sloped at the lower levels of the wage. (2) Consider a hypothetical labor force dynamics scenario for the month of November 2012. The stocks are the following: unemployed (U) = 5 million, employed (E) = 10 million, and Not-in-theLF (~LF) = 3 million. From the beginning of November to the end of November the change in U is (+)1 million and the change in ~LF is (+)1 million. The flow from ~LF to U is 2 million, and the flow from U to ~LF is 1.5 million. The flow from U to E is 2 million, and the flow from E to U is 2.5 million. a. What are some possible flows between E and ~LF? b. What is the change in the stock of E? Labor Economics Problem Set One Spring XXXXXXXXXXAnswer the following questions using the BLS’s Employment Situation Report from February 1st, XXXXXXXXXXa) Fill in the table below the Household Data (“Summary Table A” will be sufficient). Be sure to use the “Seasonally Adjusted” numbers and express the absolute numbers in thousands (as given in the data). (b) What happened to the Participation Rate since over the past year? (c) Why isn’t the change in Employed the negative of the change in Unemployed? (d) Did the amount of workers in the Labor Force increase or decrease over the past year? By how much? (e) Did the amount of workers Not-In-The-Labor Force increase or decrease over the past year? (f) How is it possible for the Population to increase less than the stock of people Not-in-theLabor Force? Where are these ‘extra people’ coming from? (g) What was the change in Employment between December 2012 and January 2013 according to the Household Data? (h) What would the Unemployment Rate be for January 2013 if the value of Employed (E) was taken from the Establishment Data (total non-farm employment on Table B-1), while the value of Unemployed (U) was taken from the Household Data?
Answered Same Day Dec 22, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 22 2021
134 Votes
Problem Set 1 (Spring 2013)
1. (a) If an individual does not change his/her labor supply i
espective of wage rate then the labor supply curve would be vertical and parallel to the y-axis. In the figure below, hours is fixed at 20 hours, i
espective of the wage rate.
(b) Backward bending labor supply curve at higher levels of wage rate and positive at the lower levels of wage rate. Hours worked increases up to wage rate W2, where the labor supply curve is positively sloped and then it starts declining giving a backward bending shape to the labor supply curve.
2. (a) Unemployed (U) = 5 million, employed (E) = 10 million, and Not-in-the-LF (~LF) = 3 million. Beginning of November to the end of November: U = 6 million, ~LF=4 million.
(i) Change in U:
Before the increase U = 5 million and after the increase U = 6 million.
~LF to U = 2 and E to U = 2.5, therefore, U increases by 4.5.
Again, U to ~LF = 1.5 and U to E = 2, therefore, U decreases by 3.5.
Hence, net change in U is 4.5 - 3.5 = 1, and U = 5+1=6 million (proved).
(ii) Change in ~LF:
Before the increase ~LF = 3 million and after the increase ~LF = 4 million.
U to ~LF = 1.5 and ~LF to U = 2, therefore, change in ~LF = 1.5 – 2 = -0.5, therefore, net change in ~LF = 3 – 0.5 = 2.5.
Again, E before any change = 10 million.
U to E = 2 and E to U = 2.5, therefore, change in E = 10+2-2.5 = 9.5.
Possible cases:
(I) Transfer 1.5 from E to ~LF and no transfer to E, then ~LF = 2.5 +1.5=4 million and E = 9.5 -1.5 = 8 million.
(II) Transfer 2.5 from E to ~LF and 1 from ~LF to E, then ~LF = 2.5 + 2.5 - 1 = 4 million and E = 9.5 – 2.5 + 1 = 8 million. And so on….
(b) Before change E= 10 million, after change E= 8 million. Therefore change in stock
of E= 10-8=2 million.
3. (a)
     
    Labor Force (LF)
    Employed (E)
    Unemployed (U)
    Unemployment Rate (UR)
    Not-in-the Labor Force (~LF)
    Population
    Participation Rate
    Employment Population Ratio
    Jan-13
    155654
    143322
    12332
    7.922700348
    89008
    244662
    63.6200146
    58.5795914
    Jan-12
    154356
    141608
    12748
    8.258830237
    87913
    242269
    63.71265
    58.4507304
    Changes
    1298
    1714
    -416
    -0.336129888
    1095
    2393
    -0.09263544
    0.12886105
    Percent Change
    0.84091321
    1.210384
    -3.26325698
     
    1.2455496
    0.987745
     
     
****Numbers are in thousands
(b) Participation rate has decreased from 63.71% to 63.62%.
(c) LF = E + U …… (Eq1)
Net change between years 2012 and 2013: 1298 = 1714 – 416, which balances. Labor force participation has...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here