Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

For the field of healthcare administration, healthcare leaders and administrators may contribute to the public policy process by advocating for and implementing policy changes to enhance delivery...

1 answer below »

For the field of healthcare administration, healthcare leaders and administrators may contribute to the public policy process by advocating for and implementing policy changes to enhance delivery goals for an HSO while also benefitting the HSO’s patient population. Yet, within the public policy process, how do healthcare leaders best engage in the process?

There are four steps in the public policy process: 1) identifying a problem, 2) formulating a policy, 3) implementing the policy change, and 4) evaluating the result. While the steps identified here are simplified, they do present a cycle or sequence that healthcare administration leaders may act upon to influence public policy. Consider how healthcare leaders might have contributed to the public policy that brought about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). At what step in the process might have healthcare administration professionals contributed their perspective in designing or implementing this law?

I. Description of how a healthcare administration leader might influence the public policy process to the advantage of a health services organization or other professional association.

Part II.

Stark and anti-kickback statutes are in place to ensure that health services organizations are in compliance for engaging in fair and equitable business practices. While adherence to these statutes is not necessarily different for a wide variety of organizations, healthcare administration leaders must be careful to ensure that healthcare delivery and health services are made available and delivered in a fair and legal manner.

I. Description of Stark and anti-kickback statutes for compliance within your health services organization. Then, describe what statutes you might address from compliance perspective as a current or future healthcare administration leader. Be specific and provide examples. Explain how your efforts to comply with these statutes address safe harbors and be specific about their relevance for your health services organization.

References:

Furrow, et al. (2018). Health law: Cases, materials, and problems (8th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.

  • Chapter 16, “Antitrust” (pp XXXXXXXXXX)

Singer, T. G XXXXXXXXXXAntitrust implications of the affordable care act [PDF]. Journal of Health and Life Sciences Law, 6(2), 1–18.

Answered Same Day Nov 11, 2021

Solution

Arundhati answered on Nov 12 2021
166 Votes
Name of the student
Name of the teache
Date of submission
Total word count
Summary
Probably the hardest thing about presenting development or change in associations is getting individuals ready. This is particularly obvious in medical services.
As medical services associations are being forced to reduce expenses, diminish clinical blunders, and em
ace both normalized measures and new developments, suppliers are being approached to su
ender set up and agreeable methods of working. They are investing more energy in the documentation, see more patients in a day, and utilize new cycles and devices. For some staff, doctors, and medical attendants, these progressions mean less time recuperating patients and encouraging wellbeing — the reasons they became medical care experts. Normally, many begin to scrutinize the course of their association, as these new practices and practices seem to struggle with the estimations of their calling.
Public Policy Process
There are four stages in the public strategy measure: 1) distinguishing an issue, 2) detailing an a
angement, 3) actualizing the approach change, and 4) assessing the outcome. While the means distinguished here are streamlined, they do introduce a cycle or a
angement that medical care organization pioneers may follow up on to impact public approach.
Somewhere in the range of 1988 and 1994 numerous states contemplated—and some established—a
angement activities to change their medical care frameworks, to control costs and grow admittance to mind. These endeavors wandered from beforehand thin methodologies (for instance, endorsement of-need or rate guideline) by consolidating strategy instruments in a planned manner, which may have mi
ored a more...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here