Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

economy 11:Strategic Alliances: Part II Given the readings in Module 10 and 11, how should a Middle Eastern company evaluate the success of a strategic alliance? Identify relevant criteria and discuss...

1 answer below »
economy 11:Strategic Alliances: Part II

Given the readings in Module 10 and 11, how should a Middle Eastern company evaluate the success of a strategic alliance? Identify relevant criteria and discuss your reasons for including them. Describe why they are relevant across industries, cultures, and geographic locations.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

  • 4 pages in length
  • Support your analysis by referencing and citing at least three credible sources in addition to the course textbook.
  • Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines, citing references as appropriate.
Answered Same Day Dec 26, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 26 2021
133 Votes
Running Head: Strategic Alliances: Part II
1
Economy 11: Strategic Alliances: Part II
Author’s Name
Affiliation
Strategic Alliances: Part II 2

Introduction
In order to measure the performance of strategic alliance done either through merger or
acquisition, there are various scorecards available on the basis of which it is possible to check the
standing of the organization in terms of various parameters. Strategic planning can be used to
improve the performance of an organization’s operations through measurement of key
performance indicators which provides connection to goals and objectives of two amalgamated
companies. Similarly, in the alliance process of two organizations it is necessary to measure the
enefits of new and innovative techniques introduced for the operations of the company. From
the perspective of financial performance, it is important to find the contribution towards the
success of alliance in terms of cash flows, profit maximizing goal and other finance related
processes. Last indicator is the relationship of the two companies in terms of loyalty and business
health of their partners signifying their satisfaction level after strategic alliance.
Relevant criteria for measuring success of strategic alliance
The relevance of few key performance indicators is usually measured across various
culture, industries and geographical locations so that it becomes easier to manage the progress
elements from a common viewpoint. A Middle East organization can measure the success of the
strategic alliance by looking at the response of various criteria through which identification of
areas of improvement can be determined. It might include parameters like the trust capability of
the partners present at different geographical locations and conducting regular business health
check up on the basis of flows of cash along with revenue generation capacity and achievement
of sales target. It would reveal the suitability of local cultural conditions for the progress of the
new organization entering the alliance with the host country company.
Strategic Alliances: Part II 3

By conducting annual alliance review meetings, the companies can access the problems
and challenges relating to the responses of managerial conduct in focussing over the new
capabilities achieved by strategic alliance working with different processes. It is different for
different types of industries because heavy investment companies follow different criteria for
their operational procedures to assess the level of...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here