Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Deadline is March 14 at 1pm est

1 answer below »
business law w1 discussion
Use in-text citations and a Reference List in APA
format to cite the course resource(s) used - an in-text
citation cannot exist without a co
esponding Reference
List, and a Reference List cannot exist without a
co
esponding in-text citation.
Post responses here in public discussion forum. 
Put the following in the subject line:  Discussion + your
name.
Address each classmate by name, and sign your name
to each posting, please. 
Write in-depth, comprehensive responses that promote
further discussion beyond merely agreeing/disagreeing
- refer to the "Winning Discussion
Responses" module in Content for examples.
Discussion:  Part 1 due Saturday, 11:59 pm ET; Part
2 due Tuesday, 11:59 pm ET
Review Content modules:
• Writing Introductory Sentences and Paragraphs
• Writing Concluding Paragraphs
• How to Support Arguments and Positions
Tips for Formatting and Structuring Parts 1 and 2:
• Write in complete sentences in paragraph format.
• Use in-text citations citing to relevant assignment
materials. 
• Label parts as appropriate.   
• Double-space; 12-point Arial or Times Roman font.
• Introductory Sentence:  Begin with an
introductory sentence or very
ief paragraph that
states your conclusion to the questions asked.  
• Concluding Sentence:  End the discussion with a
concluding sentence or a very
ief paragraph that
summarizes your conclusion/what you discussed.
• Support Arguments and Positions:   Please
efer to the module in Content, "How to Support
Arguments and Positions". Part 1:  

Background/Facts:  Determining jurisdiction in the
courts can be confusing and complicated, but it is
an important legal doctrine that businesses cannot
ignore.  Jurisdiction can affect business operations
and determine business decisions, such as where
the business is located and where and how to
advertise and market the business.  Where there
are questions about possible jurisdiction in the
courts, companies should consult an attorney.

TLG's client, Clean, is facing other litigation and
needs advice.  

Clean is located in Maryland, but it advertises
aggressively in all Mid-Atlantic States of Maryland,
Delaware, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and
Virginia via the internet, social media, television,
and mailings.

Recently Clean contracted with ABC Corporation
(ABC), incorporated in Virginia, to clean ABC's
offices in Norfolk, Virginia. ABC paid for the
cleaning and sanitizing services but later was
dissatisfied with the services and sued Clean in
Virginia to recover the cleaning costs.  ABC is
trying to decide whether it should file the case in
Virginia or Maryland state court.
1. Applying the concept of personal
jurisdiction to the scenario facts,
discuss why you agree or disagree that
the Virginia court has personal
jurisdiction over Clean. 
2. Applying the concept of personal
jurisdiction to the scenario facts,
discuss whether the Maryland court
has personal jurisdiction over Clean.
•
Answered 2 days After Mar 11, 2024

Solution

Dipali answered on Mar 14 2024
5 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        5
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Discussion: Part 1    3
Personal Jurisdiction in Virginia    3
Personal Jurisdiction in Maryland    3
Conclusion    4
Reference    5
Discussion: Part 1
In this case, Clean, a business located in Maryland that ABC Corporation is suing in Virginia for providing subpar cleaning services, raises the question of personal jurisdiction. A court's authority over the parties to a case is refe
ed to as personal jurisdiction, and it is established by a number of circumstances, such as the defendant's interactions with the forum state.
Personal Jurisdiction in Virginia
According to the scenario given, Clean uses mailers, social media, television, internet marketing, and television to advertise and do business in Virginia and other Mid-Atlantic states. "Minimum contacts" with the state of Virginia are what these activities include (Nash, 2020), the concept of minimum contacts was established. The court ruled that in order for a court to exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant, the defendant had to have enough minimum contacts with the forum state so as not to...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here