Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Course: Health Promotion Strategies In this paper you will compare two health promotion interventions targeting the same health issue. Search the library and find two articles that evaluate health...

1 answer below »

Course: Health Promotion Strategies
In this paper you will compare two health promotion interventions targeting the same health issue.
Search the li
ary and find two articles that evaluate health promotion programs that have similar goals (Example: Both have the goal of controlling hypertension).
· Identify the strategies, theories and settings that the program used.
· Include:
· Which health behavior are the programs aiming to change?
· Why is the health behavior significant? (incidence & prevalence of issues that could occur due to health behavior)
· Detail how each of the 2 programs were implemented
· Compare the impact and outcomes of the two programs
· Critique the two programs/interventions
· 7 pages content double-spaced, APA, title page, reference page

Week Four_ Research Paper. Comparing In...otion Strategies - National University
7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University
https:
nationalu.
ightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/use
folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 1/5
Research paper Ru
ic COH 618
Course: COH618 Health Promotion Strategies
Criteria
OUTSTANDIN
G
ACHIEVEMEN
T
COMMENDA
BLE
ACHIEVEMEN
T
MARGINAL
ACHIEVEMEN
T
UNSATISFAC
TORY
FAILING
Criterion
Score
2 evaluated
interventio
ns
XXXXXXXXXX
Significant
health
ehavio
10
XXXXXXXXXX
points
Student has
selected two
evaluated
intervention
s that target
the same
health issue.
The two
intervention
s have been
implemented
and
evaluated
and used
significantly
different
strategies.
XXXXXXXXXX
points
Student has
selected two
evaluated
intervention
s that target
the same
health issue.
The two
intervention
s have been
implemented
and
evaluated.
10.5 points
Student has
selected two
evaluated
intervention
s that target
the same
health issue.
9 points
The selected
intervention
s do not
clearly
address the
same health
issue.
0 points
missing
10 points
The health
issue that is
addressed is
clearly a
significant
public health
issue for the
target
population.
9 points
The health
issue that is
addressed is
a significant
public health
issue for the
target
population.
7 points
The health
issue that is
addressed is
somewhat a
significant
public health
issue for the
target
population.
6 points
The health
issue that is
addressed is
marginally a
significant
public health
issue for the
target
population.
0 points
7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University
https:
nationalu.
ightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/use
folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 2/5
Criteria
OUTSTANDIN
G
ACHIEVEMEN
T
COMMENDA
BLE
ACHIEVEMEN
T
MARGINAL
ACHIEVEMEN
T
UNSATISFAC
TORY
FAILING
Criterion
Score
Implementa
tion
20
Compare
and
Contrast
20
Critique of
two
programs
20
Writing
Style
10
20 points
The student
gives a very
clea
description
of how each
program was
implemented
.
18 points
The student
gives a clea
description
of how each
program was
implemented
.
14 points
The student
gives a
somewhat
clea
description
of how each
program was
implemented
.
12 points
The student
gives a
marginally
clea
description
of how each
program was
implemented
.
0 points
20 points
Student
makes
several clea
comparisons
etween the
two
programs.
18 points
Student
makes some
clea
comparisons
etween the
two
programs.
14 points
Student
makes few
clea
comparisons
etween the
two
programs.
12 points
Student
makes very
few clea
comparisons
etween the
two
programs.
0 points
missing
20 points
Student
applies
knowledge
from the
study of
health
promotion
to critique
the two
intervention
s.
18 points
Student
applies some
knowledge
from the
study of
health
promotion
to critique
the two
intervention
s.
14 points
Student
applies little
knowledge
from the
study of
health
promotion
to critique
the two
intervention
s.
12 points
Student
applies
minimal
knowledge
from the
study of
health
promotion
to critique
the two
intervention
s.
0 points
10 points
All
sentences
9 points
Almost all
sentences
7 points
Most
sentences
6 points
Sentences
lack
0 points
E
ors in
writing
7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University
https:
nationalu.
ightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/use
folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 3/5
Criteria
OUTSTANDIN
G
ACHIEVEMEN
T
COMMENDA
BLE
ACHIEVEMEN
T
MARGINAL
ACHIEVEMEN
T
UNSATISFAC
TORY
FAILING
Criterion
Score
are well-
constructed
with varied
structure. All
sentences
sound
natural and
are easy-on-
the-ea
when read
aloud. Each
sentence is
clear and has
an obvious
emphasis.
Write
makes no
e
ors in
grammar o
spelling that
distract the
eader from
the content.
Write
makes no
e
ors in
capitalizatio
n o
punctuation,
so the pape
is
exceptionall
y easy to
ead. Write
uses vivid
words and
phrases that
linger o
draw
pictures in
the reader's
sound
natural and
are easy-on-
the-ea
when read
aloud, but 1
or 2 are stiff
and
awkward o
difficult to
understand.
Write
makes few
e
ors in
grammar o
spelling that
distract the
eader from
the content.
Write
makes 1 or 2
e
ors in
capitalizatio
n o
punctuation,
ut the
paper is still
easy to read.
Writer uses
vivid words
and phrases
that linger o
draw
pictures in
the reader's
mind, but
occasionally
the words
are used
inaccurately
are well-
constructed
ut have a
simila
structure.
Most
sentences
sound
natural and
are easy-on-
the-ea
when read
aloud, but
several are
stiff and
awkward o
are difficult
to
understand.
Write
makes some
e
ors in
grammar o
spelling that
distract the
eader from
the content.
Write
makes a few
e
ors in
capitalizatio
n and/o
punctuation
that catch
the reader's
attention
and
inte
upt the
flow. Write
uses words
that
structure
and appea
incomplete
or rambling.
The
sentences
are difficult
to read
aloud
ecause
they sound
awkward,
are
distractingly
epetitive, o
are difficult
to
understand.
Write
makes many
e
ors in
grammar o
spelling that
distract the
eader from
the content.
Write
makes
several
e
ors in
capitalizatio
n and/o
punctuation
that catch
the reader's
attention
and greatly
inte
upt the
throughout.
7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University
https:
nationalu.
ightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/use
folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 4/5
Total / XXXXXXXXXX
Criteria
OUTSTANDIN
G
ACHIEVEMEN
T
COMMENDA
BLE
ACHIEVEMEN
T
MARGINAL
ACHIEVEMEN
T
UNSATISFAC
TORY
FAILING
Criterion
Score
Referencin
g
5
mind, and
the choice
and
placement of
the words
seems
accurate,
natural and
not forced.
or seem
overdone.
communicat
e clearly, but
the writing
lacks variety,
punch o
flair.
flow. Write
uses a
limited
vocabulary
that does
not
communicat
e strongly o
capture the
eader's
interest.
Jargon o
cliches may
e present
and detract
from the
meaning.
5 points
Citations
and
eferences
are in prope
APA format.
Ample
sources are
cited. All
claims are
supported
with a
professional
eference.
4.5 points
Citations
and
eferences
are in prope
APA format.
Ample
sources are
cited. Some
claims leave
the reade
looking for a
eference.
3.5 points
Citations
and
eferences
are in prope
APA format.
Ample
sources are
cited. Many
claims leave
the reade
looking for a
eference.
3 points
Citations
and
eferences
are limited,
missing o
inco
ect.
0 points
Citations
and
eferences
are missing
or inco
ect.
7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University
https:
nationalu.
ightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/use
folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 5/5
Overall Score
OUTSTANDING
ACHIEVEMENT
95 points minimum
COMMENDABLE
ACHIEVEMENT
80 points minimum
MARGINAL
ACHIEVEMENT
65 points minimum
UNSATISFA
CTORY
30 points
minimum
FAILING
0 points
minimum
question-file-l2ntuzm1.docx grading-rubric-eamqxj0a.pdf
Answered 2 days After Jul 23, 2022

Solution

Insha answered on Jul 26 2022
83 Votes
Running Head: Health Promotion Strategies                            1
Health Promotion Strategies                                    2
HEALTH PROMOTION STRATEGIES
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Background    3
Need for change    4
Significance    4
Implementation    5
Multi-component interventions    5
Health screenings    5
Comparison of outcome    6
Critique    7
Conclusion    9
References    10
Introduction
Health promotion is a top issue for these populations since they exhibit lower levels of healthy habits than older people and people with intellectual and developmental impairments. In order to understand the strategies employed by both and identify innovative and new practices that disability researchers can learn from one another, this paper reviews the two fields of disability and aging health promotion research using two interventions: multi-component interventions and screening.
Background
Compared to past generations, those with developmental and intellectual impairments are living longer. However, they frequently have poorer health and the beginning of age-related illnesses early due to challenges with access to treatment and biological and lifestyle variables. They make up around six million of the population in America and develop osteoporosis and diabetes early in life (Kinnear et al. 2018). Numerous studies show that persons with developmental and intellectual impairments have lower levels of physical activity, poor fitness, poor nutrition, and a higher risk of falling.
A little more than 28% e34% of people over the age of 65 and 35% e44% of people over the age of 75 are not active (Alexander et al. 2020). A wide variety of treatments have been carefully studied and well-documented for decades in the field of health promotion for older individuals. Gerontologists will be better able to provide culturally appropriate therapies if they are aware of the underlying principles in disability scholarship. Two categories of interventions were used to classify the papers under review: multicomponent interventions and health care and screening interventions. The interventions were ca
ied out in a variety of contexts, including community settings (50%) and residential facilities (21%) (Alexander et al. 2020).
Need for change
Compared to the general population, people with intellectual impairments have a greater frequency of health issues, and their needs are frequently ignored. The Healthy Persons 2010 project in the United States and the Valuing People initiative in the United Kingdom both specifically aim to improve the health of people with disabilities throughout their lifetimes (Kinnear et al. 2018). An improvement in health was observed in the intervention group in a recent randomised controlled study on yearly health screenings in adults with intellectual disabilities.
The physical and/or mental health of the person is impacted by a wide range of medical issues that are linked to intellectual disability. In terms of physical health, epilepsy, mobility issues, and sensory issues are the most prevalent issues. There is evidence that secondary health issues in persons with intellectual impairment include obesity, fractures, poor dental health, constipation, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Poor oral health is common, and difficult behaviour may be caused by dental pain.
Significance
Because they may not be able to comprehend the importance of their physical symptoms, people with intellectual impairments may not report them as soon as they should. Physical issues might present themselves as difficult conduct or a loss of everyday function rather than somatic symptoms. Psychotropic medications administered for problematic behaviour might sometimes cause physical issues as a side effect.
Inadequate financial level, social marginalization, and a lack of social networks are all linked to lower self-reported health status, according to a cross-sectional research of 1273 persons with intellectual impairment in the UK (Willner et al. 2018). Rarely are individuals with intellectual impairments represented in European health information systems. Therefore, the prevalence of various illnesses is influenced by the lack of easily comprehensible health promotion and intervention materials.
Implementation
Multi-component interventions
Adults with developmental and intellectual impairments have been found to benefit from intensive physical and mental health interventions in terms of their physical, behavioural, and psychological results. These treatments had a variety of positive effects, such as lowered blood pressure, enhanced balance, increased strength, and increased aerobic and respiratory...
SOLUTION.PDF
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here
Attach File