| This criterion is linked to a learning outcome1.Case study developed is clear, informative and feasible | | 5PtsExceeds expectationsVery well considered case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and comprehensively presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction is clearly defined. | 4PtsMeets ExpectationsWell considered case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and thoroughly presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction is clearly defined. | 3PtsMeets ExpectationsGood case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and clearly presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction lacks some clarity. | 2.5PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction lacks some detail or depth. | 0PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory case study. The child/family circumstances are not clearly presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction lacks clarity/detail making it difficult for the reader to conceptualise the situation. |
| 5pts
|
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcome2.Outline the prevalence in Australia of the childhood experience chosen and highlight the short term, medium term and potential long term health outcomes/impact on the child | | 10PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy and comprehensive consideration of health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience. | 8PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy and thorough consideration of health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience. | 7PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy and fair consideration of health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience; may lack depth detail in some aspects. | 5PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy, health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience may be limited; further depth in response/consideration would have increased marks. | 0PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating inaccuracy and inadequacy regarding prevalence data and/or health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience; further depth in response/consideration would have increased marks. |
| 10pts
|
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcome3.Discuss the impact (protective or otherwise) of family, culture and environment on the identified health outcomes for children identified from criteria 2 | | 10PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this criterion, demonstrating sophisticated insight into the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child identified in criteria 2. | 8PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion, demonstrating well considered insight into the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child identified in criteria 2. | 7PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion, demonstrating some insight into the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child identified in criteria 2. | 5PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating sufficient understanding of the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child identified in criteria 2; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark. | 0PtsNo MarksUnsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child; discussion may be general rather than specific to the situation presented in the case study. |
| 10pts
|
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcome4. Explore the impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study, in light of their age/stage of development | | 10PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this criterion, demonstrating sophisticated examination of the possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study. | 8PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion, demonstrating a thorough examination of the possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study. | 7PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion, demonstrating well considered possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study. | 5PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating a sufficient understanding of the possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark. | 0PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark; discussion may be general rather than specific to the situation presented in the case study. |
| 10pts
|
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcome5. When you (the nurse) meet the family (as outlined in your case study) how might you engage therapeutically with the child and family? Outline age/development appropriate communication strategies that you could adopt to support child/family flourishing | | 10PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this criterion, outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing. | 8PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion, outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing. | 7PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion, outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing. | 5PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion, outlining some therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing; but may be somewhat generic. | 0PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory achievement against this criteria, therapeutic engagement strategies may be absent or inconsistent with/inappropriate for the family/child situation as outlined in the case study; discussion may be general rather than specific to the situation presented in the case study. |
| 10pts
|
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcome6. Based on the chosen childhood experience selected and the case study specifics, provide two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions (separate to the therapeutic engagement strategies) with rationales, that would advocate for positive child/family health outcomes | | 5PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions are clearly articulated and thoroughly justified. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are specific to the needs of the child/family in the case. | 4PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales are clearly articulated. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are specific to the needs of child/family in the case. | 3.5PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales suggested. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are relevant to the needs of the child/family but may not address the most pressing priorities as objectively presented in the case. | 2.5PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales suggested. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are relevant to the needs of the child/family but are more generic rather than specific to the situation. | 0PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory achievement against this criterion. Nursing actions are absent or demonstrate a lack of understanding regarding prioritization of care needs in relation to the presented case; discussion may be general rather than specific to the situation presented in the case study. |
| 5pts
|
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcome7. Use of evidence. Criteria 2-6 above are informed by at least 12 sources of high quality contemporary, relevant and credible developmental, nursing and family care theory and literature that is integrated into discussion to support key points | | 5PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this criterion, a very well informed paper utilizing high quality evidence | 4PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion, a very well informed paper | 3PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion; a well informed paper that would benefit from further reading an research in some areas or some different choices of evidence | 2.5PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion; a paper that is accurate in its content but lacks depth in some areas or relies on evidence that is variable in quality. Further reading and research would have improved achievement against this criterion | 0PtsUnsatisfactoryThis paper does not draw on sufficient reliable, contemporary of relevant theory or literature to present an informed position. Further reading, research and effort to integrate evidence into discussion would have improved achievement against this criterion |
| 5pts
|
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcome8.Scholarly approach; written expression, development of essay and acknowledgement of sources, adherence to word count 2000words +/- 10% (inclusive of intext citations, excludes reference list). Submission is formatted using Times New Roman, 12 font and double spaced with 2.54cm 'normal' margins. | | 5PtsExceeds expectationsExcellent essay structure that is logical, clear, and sophisticated in its development. Professional terminology is used throughout. No errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling. APA 7th referencing style is used, no referring errors in text or reference list. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10% and submission formatting. | 4PtsMeets ExpectationsVery good essay structure. Occasional errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling. Minor editing and revision required. APA 7th referencing style is used, minor errors in intext citations and/or reference list. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10% and submission formatting. | 3PtsMeets ExpectationsGood essay structure. Some errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling, limited editing and revision required. APA 7th referencing style is used, some errors in intext citations and/or reference list. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%, and submission formatting is mostly correct. | 2.5PtsSatisfactoryAdequate essay structure. Consistent errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling which detract from the clarity of the work, however key points are still adequately communicated to the reader. Significant editing and revision required to improve the academic quality of the work. APA 7th referencing style is used inconsistently, with errors. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10% and submission formatting is mostly correct. | 0PtsUnsatisfactoryPoor essay structure, errors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling detract significantly from the clarity of the writing so that ideas and understanding of concepts cannot be communicated clearly to the reader. Thorough editing and revision is required to achieve satisfactorily in this criteria. Incorrect application of APA 7th edition referencing style resulting in inadequate acknowledgement of sources and risk of breaching academic integrity/plagiarism. Word count not adhered to, formatting of work impedes clarity of message and document presentation. |
| 5pts
|
| Total points:60 |