can you make sure the assignment is not written with the help of any AI software. THankyou

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        3
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Executive Summary
This policy report aims to delve deeper into the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) and propose necessary changes to enhance its effectiveness and inclusivity. The report identifies a critical aspect of the NDIS requiring modification, provides a rationale for the proposed change, explores relevant theories of policy change, scans key stakeholders involved in the policy area, and outlines a preliminary plan for policy advocacy.
Table of contents
Executive Summary    2
Introduction    4
Aspect of the Policy for Change    5
Justification    6
Theories of Policy Change    7
Stakeholder Analysis    8
Preliminary Policy Advocacy Plan    10
Conclusion    11
References    13
Introduction
    One of Australia's most ambitious and revolutionary social initiatives, the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) seeks to completely change the way that disability support services are provided. Since its creation, the NDIS has worked to promote independence, inclusion, and social involvement among people with disabilities by giving them more control over the resources and services they receive. But in spite of its
oad goals, the NDIS has faced a number of implementation-related obstacles, underscoring the necessity for continual assessment and improvement.
    The process of evaluation and planning in the NDIS framework is one of the main areas that needs close examination (Maestas, Mullen & Strand, 2021). Through this procedure, people may join the program and get the services that are specifically designed to meet their requirements. However, issues have been
ought up about the evaluations' lack of consistency and uniformity, which has led to unfairness and differences in the services provided to various demographic groups and geographical areas. These disparities not only compromise the fundamental tenets of justice and equality upon which the NDIS was established, but they also sustain structural impediments that impede marginalized groups in the disability community from accessing critical assistance.
    In an effort to allay these wo
ies, this paper proposes a significant overhaul of the NDIS's planning and evaluation processes. To be more precise, the study will examine the reasoning behind the suggested policy change and base its recommendations on pertinent theories of policy analysis. In addition, a thorough stakeholder analysis will be ca
ied out to identify important players in the disability sector and their respective contributions to the development of policy results. Finally, the study will include a first strategy for policy advocacy, including tactics for working with stakeholders and engaging them in order to promote significant changes to the NDIS framework. By doing this, the report hopes to promote the continuous development and improvement of Australia's disability support system, guaranteeing that the NDIS continues to be responsive to the various needs of people with disabilities and maintains the values of social justice, fairness, and equity.
Aspect of the Policy for Change
    The assessment and planning process, which is a crucial element of the participant's journey through the program, is the focal point for policy reform within the National Disability Insurance program (NDIS). As things stand, there are differences in how resources and support services are distributed since this process is inconsistent and does not follow a standard procedure. Different jurisdictions and participant cohorts exhibit discrepancies in evaluation criteria, decision-making procedures, and resource distribution methods, among other manifestations of these inconsistencies.
    One of the main issues is that various assessors and agencies use disparate evaluation procedures, which leads to subjective interpretations of the requirements and situations of participants (Cortese et al., 2021). Because of this, people who have comparable impairments and support needs may receive radically different amounts of help, depending on things like organizational procedures, assessor experience, and geographic location. The fundamental values of fairness, equity, and openness upon which the NDIS was established are undermined by these disparities, which sustain structural injustices within the disability support system. Furthermore, a person-centered approach—which gives priority to an individual's objectives, preferences, and ambitions in designing their support plans—is inadequately included into the existing evaluation process. Rather, assessments frequently place a higher priority on participant empowerment than bureaucratic efficiency, which causes a gap between the services offered and the participants' true needs and goals. This compromises the participant's agency and autonomy while also lessening the viability and efficacy of the NDIS-established support systems. Given these difficulties, there is a strong argument to be made for changing the NDIS's planning and evaluation procedures in order to guarantee more consistency, openness, and participant-centeredness. Policymakers may improve the efficacy and inclusiveness of the program by resolving these issues, creating a more just and powerful atmosphere that will enable people with disabilities to flourish and engage fully in society.
Justification
    Based on...