Building upon the skills you learnt in your first assessment, write an argumentative critical review of:Australian Government XXXXXXXXXXSafeguarding Our Community Together: Australia's Counter-Terrorism Strategy 2022. Found at:https://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/what-australia-is-doing-subsite/Files/safeguarding-community-together-ct-strategy-22.pdfLinks to an external site. An argumentative critical review requires the following: Identification and summation of the key elements and components of the strategy An argument to reform the Strategy to protect human rights. Questions to ask to help make your argument, include: What does the Strategy say about the relationship between human rights and combating terrorism? Do human rights need to be strengthened in the Strategy? If so, why? If not, why not? When making your argument: Identify if or why it needs to be reformed; Relate your argument to international human rights laws and principles; Argue why your argument is important and why it should be adopted; and Argue how your argument advances human rights efforts in Australia. Your critical argumentative review will also require: An introduction and conclusion. Use of scholarly sources. A minimum of 15 references are required. This does NOT include the Strategy, which must be cited in the references list. Reference list/bibliography. APA7 (in-text) referencing. The in-text referencing is counted in the word count. The references list is not counted in the word count.

Building upon the skills you learnt in your first assessment, write an argumentative critical review of:Australian Government XXXXXXXXXXSafeguarding Our Community Together: Australia's...

1 answer below »

Building upon the skills you learnt in your first assessment, write an argumentative critical review of:

Australian Government XXXXXXXXXXSafeguarding Our Community Together: Australia's Counter-Terrorism Strategy 2022. Found at:https://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/what-australia-is-doing-subsite/Files/safeguarding-community-together-ct-strategy-22.pdfLinks to an external site.

An argumentative critical review requires the following:

Identification and summation of the key elements and components of the strategy

An argument to reform the Strategy to protect human rights. Questions to ask to help make your argument, include:
1. What does the Strategy say about the relationship between human rights and combating terrorism?
2. Do human rights need to be strengthened in the Strategy? If so, why? If not, why not?

When making your argument:
- - Identify if or why it needs to be reformed;
  - Relate your argument to international human rights laws and principles;
  - Argue why your argument is important and why it should be adopted; and
  - Argue how your argument advances human rights efforts in Australia.

Your critical argumentative review will also require:

An introduction and conclusion.

Use of scholarly sources. A minimum of 15 references are required. This does NOT include the Strategy, which must be cited in the references list.

Reference list/bibliography.

APA7 (in-text) referencing. The in-text referencing is counted in the word count. The references list is not counted in the word count.

Answered 7 days After Aug 21, 2023

Solution

Deblina answered on Aug 29 2023

37 Votes

SOLUTION.PDF

Building upon the skills you learnt in your first assessment, write an argumentative critical review of:Australian Government XXXXXXXXXXSafeguarding Our Community Together: Australia's...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment