Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Page | 1 Book Review Evaluation The following checklist will be used for your Book Review Presentation. Item Points [max] Points given Point System Within 5 minute timeframe 10 Unsatisfactory: 0-3...

1 answer below »
Page | 1

Book Review Evaluation

The following checklist will be used for your Book Review Presentation.
Item Points
[max]
Points
given
Point System
Within 5 minute
timeframe
10 Unsatisfactory: 0-3
Satisfactory: 4-7
Outstanding: 8-10

Greeting 10
Introduction 10
Three (3) take-aways 10
Recommendation 10
Slides (pictures/words) 10
Organization 10
Levels for each Item
Five (5) Minute Timeframe
Presentation is within 5 minutes: 10 points
More than 5 minutes: 5 points deducted for each additional minute
Greeting/Introduction
Unsatisfactory:
 Did not greet evaluating teacher or audience
 Did not greet using greeting of the day (i.e. “Hello all,” “Hey everybody”)
 Did not introduce self
 Did not state main topic/position or stated wrong main topic/position
Satisfactory:
 Greeted evaluating teacher or audience, but not both
 Used inco
ect greeting of the day (i.e. good morning when it’s afternoon)
 Did not state topic/position clearly (i.e. for advocacy
iefing, stated topic but
not position)
Outstanding:
 Greeted evaluating officer AND audience using co
ect ve
iage (Greeting of the
day, si
ma’am. Greeting of the day, ladies/gentlemen/students.)
 Introduced self (i.e. “My name is _____,” and today I’m talking about ____ )
 Clearly stated topic/position
Three (3) take-aways
Unsatisfactory
 Briefing had less than three main points
 Provided little or no information on main points
 Inco
ect level of detail given on each main point (i.e. each main point was too
detailed or too
oad)
 Inaccurate information given
Page | 2

Satisfactory
 Provided some information on main points
 Appropriate level of detail given on 1-2 main points.
Outstanding
 Briefing had three main points (For advocacy
iefing: three or more)
 Provided robust information on main points
 Appropriate level of detail given on every main point (i.e. not too detailed or not
too
oad)

Recommendation
Unsatisfactory:
 Did not state the topic/position or stated the wrong topic/position
 Missed one or more main points and/or did not laundry list main points
 Re
iefed main points (i.e. student expanded main point summary significantly
to meet time requirement)
 Introduced new information that was not previously discussed in the
iefing
 Formal conclusion was not used (i.e. “That’s all I got!”)
Satisfactory:
 Topic/position not clearly stated
 Briefly expanded on some main points and/or laundry listed main points
 Inco
ectly stated or stated some of this statement: “This concludes my
iefing.
Are there any questions?”
Outstanding:
 Clearly stated main topic/position
Organization/Clarity
Unsatisfactory:
 Main points were not related to the purpose or each other
 Content order was not logical and distracted from flow
 Missed one or more transitions between main points (i.e. did not transition from
one main point to the next)
 Spent inappropriate time on each main point (i.e. too much time or not enough
time; i.e. spoke at length about last main point to make time)
Satisfactory:
 Organization and flow of information was adequate
 Used all mechanical transitions or combination of some creative and some
mechanical
 transitions between all main points. (i.e. mechanical transition:
next/now/secondly, we will discuss main point 2)
Outstanding:
 Skillfully related the main points to purpose and each other
 Organization aided audience’s understanding and retention
 Used creative transitions between all main points. (i.e. creative transition: We
discussed in main point 1 and it relates to main point 2…)
 Spent appropriate time on each main point; time spent discussing main point
allowed for
 sufficient/appropriate discussion of topic
Page | 3
Communication
Unsatisfactory:
 Had significant problems with articulation and pronunciation
 Used excessive number of distracting vocalized pauses or filler words
 Used poor word choice that detracted from speaker’s credibility (i.e. use of
“stuff,”
“things,” etc.)
 Used any inco
ect spoken grammar that distracted from presentation or
credibility
 Spoke too loudly or softly
 Voice inflection was monotone
 Spoke at a rate consistently too slow or fast
 Did not come across as sincere
 Sounded unconfident
Satisfactory:
 Had minor problems with articulation and pronunciation
 Had some distracting vocalized pauses or used some filler words
 Used some voice inflection at some points throughout
 Spoke at rate too fast or slow at times, but not the entire
iefing
 Had wavering vocal confidence
Outstanding:
 Used good articulation and co
ect pronunciation
 Had few or no vocalized pauses
 Used appropriate word choice that added to the speaker’s credibility
 Used co
ect spoken grammar
 Spoke at an appropriate volume
 Used appropriate voice inflection throughout
 Spoke at a varied rate appropriately throughout
 Used dynamic emphasis to effectively and appropriately stress/de-emphasize
certain aspects of the presentation
 Came across as sincere
 Sounded confident throughout
Slides
Unsatisfactory:
 Slides distracted from presentation or did not match presentation (i.e. slide has
content different from what is being ve
ally
iefed)
 Slide(s) unreadable due to background and font color combination
 Used font or font size that was unreadable or unprofessional (i.e. Curlz, Comic
Sans, script, etc. should not be used)
 Did not use pictures or graphics
 Used pictures or graphics unrelated to content
 Used graphics/images of poor quality (i.e. pixelated or stretched
graphics/images)
 Had major e
ors on slides (i.e. inco
ect grammar, inconsistent
ulleting/font/font size/format)
Page | 4

 Used distracting or unprofessional animations; animations detracted from
professionalism of presentation
 All or most slides were too empty or too crowded (i.e. not enough content on
the slide/distracting white space or unreadable because of too much
information)
 Bullets were too long and wordy (i.e. bullets were full sentences, paragraphs,
etc.)
Satisfactory:
 Slides aided presentation, but did not enhance presentation
 Had some readability issues with background and font color combination
 Font and/or font size created some readability issues at times throughout
presentation
 Used some graphics/images but all did not enhance presentation
 Had some e
ors on slides (i.e. some inco
ect grammar, inconsistent
ulleting/font/font size/format)
 Some slides were too empty or too crowded (i.e. not enough content on the
slide/distracting white space or unreadable because of too much information)
 Some bullets were concise (i.e. some bullets were appropriate length while
others were full sentences or paragraphs). Full quotations are allowed to be on
slides, regardless of length
Outstanding:
 Slides effectively enhanced presentation
 Used readable background and font color combination throughout
 Used readable, professional font and font size throughout (i.e. no Curlz, Comic
Sans, script, etc.)
 Graphics/images enhanced presentation; graphics/images related to point and
enhanced understanding of topic
 Used quality graphics/ images (i.e. not pixelated or stretched graphics/images)
 Had no e
ors in slideshow (i.e. co
ect grammar, consistent bulleting/font/font
size/format used throughout)
 Had proper amount of information on slides (i.e. amount of information
appropriate; number of bullets appropriate)
 All bullets were concise (i.e. no full sentences or paragraphs). Full quotations are
allowed to be on slides, regardless of length
Answered Same Day Jun 23, 2021

Solution

Taruna answered on Jun 26 2021
116 Votes
The Moment of Lift by Melinda Gates
The Moment of Lift
y Melinda Gates
A Review of the Main Ideas of the Book
Introduction
Greetings of the Day!
Hello Ladies, Gentleman and students present in the class.
My Name is…..and I am going to present the key ideas of the book by Melinda Gates entitled: Moment of Lift: How Empowering Woman Changes the World.
Let’s begin by the key ideas and then I will present some recommendations as well.
Key Idea One: Family Planning Lies in Women Empowerment
The first key idea of the book lies in empowering women through educating them about family planning.
Woman is the key source of family wellbeing and, therefore; she is responsible for the overall growth of the society.
In developing regions of the world in particular, the inventions of contraceptive means can help in managing population and availability of natural resources for the families.
Gates could observe the problems in vaccination process of African women...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here