Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada, CPA Canada, CPA
are trademarks and/or certification marks of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada.
© 2022, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
Les désignations « Comptables professionnels agréés du Canada », « CPA Canada » et « CPA »
sont des marques de commerce ou de certification de Comptables professionnels agréés du Canada.
© 2022 Comptables professionnels agréés du Canada. Tous droits réservés.
XXXXXXXXXX
Performance Management — Practice Case 7
Case (120 minutes)
You, CPA, work as the assistant controller for A-Plus Corp (A-Plus). You are cu
ently
working on a project with the mergers and acquisitions group, which is responsible for
integrating the recent acquisition of Business Intelligence Management Inc. (BIM), a
portable PC producer with two geographical divisions: Saskatchewan and Alberta
(Appendix I).
It is May 7, 2022, and the CFO has recently discovered that the two divisional managers
esponsible for BIM’s operations are due to be paid their 2021 performance bonuses in
less than a week. The CFO provided you with the financial and non-financial data for
the operations in Saskatchewan and Alberta (Appendix II).
Both managers’ employment agreements state the following:
1. The bonus must be paid by May 13, 2022.
2. The bonus amount is capped at $110,000.
3. The bonus amount awarded must be justified in writing.
There hasn’t been a structured approach for determining the managers’ bonuses in the
past. Therefore, the CFO is debating between two bonus structures and has asked you
to discuss and calculate the bonuses under each option and provide a recommendation
on which bonus structure to use. Specifically:
1. The CFO would like you to assess what type of responsibility centre these two
divisions are, and to identify a relevant financial measure to assess performance of
the divisions based on that classification. He would like you to use the divisional
performance (related to that measure) to determine the managers’ bonuses.
2. The CFO would like you to draft a balanced scorecard that both divisions can use.
He would like you to assess each division’s performance based on that scorecard
and determine the managers’ bonuses based on the divisional performance.
The CFO also received a call from the Saskatchewan division manager about concerns
over divisional financial performance. The Saskatchewan division manufactures wafer
chips that it uses in its own products and also provides wafer chips to the Alberta
division for its production needs (Appendix I). The manager is concerned about the
impact of the transfer on her division’s financial performance. Specifically, the
Saskatchewan division manager is wo
ied how it will impact her bonus. The CFO has
asked you to recommend an appropriate transfer pricing policy and determine the
impact on divisional results.
Your response should be no longer than 3,600 words, excluding any Excel files.
Performance Management — Practice Case 7 Case
2 / 4
Appendix I
Background information
Until recently, A-Plus focused on sourcing no-name electronics from Asian countries
and then reselling these goods to electronics retailers in North America. On January 1,
2022, A-Plus expanded into electronics manufacturing by acquiring BIM, which
specializes in manufacturing portable PC devices, such as laptops. BIM employs 700
individuals.
BIM’s operations are divided into two geographical regions: Saskatchewan and Alberta.
The Saskatchewan division has three plants and the Alberta division has one central plant.
Portable PC device manufacturing is a mass production industry, with high volumes of
identical or similar products manufactured using assembly lines. Successful portable PC
device manufacturers turn over their inventory quickly due to the rapid pace of
technology changes. Products are generally made to order for customers — either other
electronics companies, which then place their own
and on the units and resell them,
or large national electronics retail chains, which place their store
and on the units and
esell them. Each division is responsible for developing its own customer base, meeting
sales targets, and managing costs.
Performance Management — Practice Case 7 Case
3 / 4
Appendix I (continued)
Background information
The manufacturing of portable PC devices is still a relatively labour-intensive process
ecause many of the components need to be assembled precisely. Although the
Saskatchewan division manufactures wafer chips in one of its plants, most of the
electronic components used in BIM’s manufacturing process are bought from third-party
suppliers. The employees who assemble the components are mainly semi-skilled and
have been trained by BIM to perform fairly simple, repetitive operations on the assembly
line. When the units are completed, the quality assurance department tests them, and
any units that are found to be faulty are returned to the assembly line and reworked.
Because quality is key, all electronic components received from suppliers are also
tested by BIM’s quality assurance department. They do not have the time to test every
component; therefore, they test a sample of components from each batch delivered. If
they find more than one faulty component in every 20 tested, the whole batch is rejected
and returned to the supplier. To maintain assembly line equipment in peak performance,
division managers must carefully maintain maintenance schedules and are responsible
for determining and budgeting for capital expenditure needs.
The Saskatchewan division manufactures the wafer chips needed in many of the
Alberta division’s products. The corporate policy of BIM’s previous executive team was
for the Saskatchewan division to sell the wafer chips to the Alberta division at $10 per
chip (Saskatchewan division’s average production cost). The external market price for
this type of wafer chip averaged $20 per chip in 2021. The Saskatchewan division is
cu
ently manufacturing wafer chips at capacity, and if it did not have to supply the
Alberta division’s operations, it could have sold all 330,000 chips delivered to the
Alberta division to external companies in 2021.
BIM’s effective corporate tax rate is 11%.
Performance Management — Practice Case 7 Case
4 / 4
Appendix II
2021 Manufacturing divisional performance
Saskatchewan Alberta
Financial information
2021
Actual
(in ’000s)
2021
Budget
(in ’000s)
2021
Actual
(in ’000s)
2021
Budget
(in ’000s)
Sales of mobile PC products $355,200 $380,835 $188,000 $181,925
Total production costs $116,100 $116,835 $59,300 $61,200
Net operating profit after tax $130,400 $158,000 $74,300 $76,450
Total assets (average) $1,094,000 $1,020,400 $423,500 $412,780
Finished goods, raw materials,
and WIP inventories (average) $30,400 $17,900 $10,020 $9,385
Saskatchewan Alberta
Other information
2021
Actual
2021
Budget
2021
Actual
2021
Budget
Sales (in units) 649,000 651,000 367,000 365,000
Average sales price per portable
PC unit $547/unit $585/unit $512/unit $498/unit
New portable PC products
developed and tested 12 10 — —
New portable PC products
successfully
ought to market XXXXXXXXXX
% of purchases from supplier
ejected 4.8% 3.0% 2.8% 3.0%
Number of employees (average XXXXXXXXXX
Employee absenteeism (% of
total working days) 2.0% 2.1% 1.9% 2.1%
Employee turnover 10.3% 5.1% 5.6% 5.1%
Annual customer survey —
“value for money” (5 = Excellent XXXXXXXXXX
Number of wa
anty claims by
customers (per 1,000 units sold XXXXXXXXXX