1
Assignment 3: Journal article plan
Due Friday 6 November 2020
In this final assignment, you will prepare a journal article. You will have chosen a research
question for your journal article, developed a plan for your paper, selected your three
‘worlds’, and you will likely have collected your 15 academic sources.
Below are some instructions for this assignment:
• Your journal article should be at least 3,000 words in length.
• You are not ‘locked in’ to the sources that you have chosen i.e. you can swap some
out as you write if you find better or more relevant sources, or your argument changes
from what you had originally envisaged.
• Similarly, you are also not locked into the question you have selected. You may
change, but only in consultation with your tutor or myself.
• You should include your abstract at the start of your paper. You should use italics to
distinguish the abstract from the rest of the article.
• The abstract does not count toward the word limit.
• Your paper must have a bibliography attached. It does not have to include the
annotations you submitted for Assignment 2.
• It’s probably a good idea to read some undergraduate research journal articles to get a
sense to see how undergraduates in other universities and countries approach this sort
of exercise. There are many such journals in existence, but just to get you started I
ecommend the journal Reinvention which is housed at the University of Warwick in
the UK, and which I helped to run for around 8 years.
• Apart from reading the articles themselves, you should also take note of the section
Information for Authors. All journals have such a section, and they provide
instructions on the conventions that the journal expects all submissions to adhere to –
for instance, accepted citation styles, when to use Arabic numerals as opposed to
spelling out numbers, how to integrate graphs etc.. In publishing circles, this is known
as the ‘house style’. This is a useful exercise for students, because in your
professional lives you will inevitably have to prepare documents that will need to
adhere to this ‘house style’. You will find that any serious publisher will outright
eject any submission that does not adhere to their house style (just like how your
oss may ask you to just redo a document that ignores your company’s or institution’s
conventions
equirements).
• For the purposes of this assignment, you do not have to adhere to any journal’s house
style. Your formatting and polish will contribute to your final grade, however.
You will greatly improve your chances of doing well in this assignment if you also take heed
of the ru
ic on the following page:
https:
einventionjournal.org/index.php
einvention/index
2
HD to strong D Low D to C Low C to P Fail
Integration
of
Knowledge
The paper demonstrates
that the author fully
understands and has
applied concepts learned
in the unit. Concepts are
integrated into the
writer’s own insights.
The writer provides
concluding remarks that
show analysis and
synthesis of ideas.
The paper
demonstrates that the
author, for the most
part, understands and
has applied concepts
learned in the unit.
Some of the
conclusions, however,
are not supported in
the body of the paper.
The paper
demonstrates that
the author, to a
certain extent,
understands and has
applied concepts
learned in the unit.
The paper does not
demonstrate that the
author has fully
understood and applied
concepts learned in the
unit.
Topic focus
The article demonstrates
a tight focus on
addressing the question
that is posed. The
examples and evidence
selected are well-chosen
and support the argument
and/or observations
eing made. A strong
esearch statement
provides direction for the
paper at the start of the
article, either by
statement of a position or
hypothesis.
The topic is focused
ut lacks general
direction. The
examples and evidence
chosen are fair, but
lack cohesion. The
paper is about a
specific topic but the
writer has not
established a position.
The paper deviates
from the question
eing posed. The
examples and
evidence selected
do not readily
support the
observations being
made.
The topic is not clearly
defined. The examples
and evidence are poor,
incoherent, or non-
existent.
Depth of
discussion
In-depth discussion &
elaboration in all
sections of the paper.
In-depth discussion &
elaboration in most
sections of the paper.
The writer has
omitted pertinent
content or content
uns-on
excessively.
Quotations from
others outweigh the
writer’s own ideas
excessively.
Cursory discussion in
all the sections of the
paper or
ief
discussion in only a
few sections.
Cohesiveness
Ties together
information from all
sources. Paper flows
naturally from one issue
to the next. Author's
writing demonstrates an
understanding of the
elationship among
material obtained from
all sources.
For the most part, ties
together information
from all sources. Paper
flows with only some
disjointedness.
Author's writing
demonstrates an
understanding of the
elationship among
material obtained from
all sources.
Sometimes ties
together
information from
all sources. Paper
does not flow -
disjointedness is
apparent. Author's
writing does not
demonstrate an
understanding of
the relationship
among material
obtained from all
sources.
Does not tie together
information. Paper does
not flow and appears to
e created from
disparate issues.
Headings are necessary
to link concepts.
Writing does not
demonstrate
understanding any
elationships
3
Spelling and
grammar
No spelling &/or
grammar mistakes.
Formatting is excellent.
Minimal spelling &/or
grammar mistakes.
Formatting is mostly
co
ect.
Noticeable spelling
& grammar
mistakes and/or
weak formatting.
Unacceptable number
of spelling and/or
grammar mistakes.
Poor formatting.
Sources
15 or more cu
ent
academic sources, all of
which are peer-review
journal articles or
scholarly books. Clear
demonstration of further
esearch conducted
eyond sources provided
in the unit.
15 or more cu
ent
academic sources, of
which at most are peer-
eview journal articles
or scholarly
ooks. Some reliance
on sources provided in
the unit. Any web sites
utilized are
authoritative and
academic in nature.
Between XXXXXXXXXX
cu
ent acdemic
sources. Several
sources used are
not peer-reviewed
journal articles or
scholarly books.
Some web sites
utilized are not
credible.
Fewer than 10 cu
ent
sources. Most sources
used are not peer-
eviewed journal
articles or scholarly
ooks. Heavy reliance
on non-academic web
sites for information.
Citations
Cites all information
obtained from other
sources. An acceptable
citation style is used in
oth text and
ibliography.
Cites most information
obtained from other
sources. An acceptable
citation style is used in
oth text and
ibliography.
Cites some
information
obtained from other
sources. Citation
style is either
inconsistent or
inco
ect.
Does not cite sources.