PowerPoint Presentation
Final Assignment 3 Update
CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19
• HINT: The information in you Risk Matrix is closely connected to the development of
your Safety Case Report
• Safety Case Report Overall Concepts
• Outline the most significant risks in a project
• Outline all the Risks identified in a project
• Categorize the Risks (Safety, Performance, Environment)
• Sub Categorize the Risks (Very High, High, Medium, Low)
• Outline the Mitigations
• How are the Mitigations Implemented (Implementation Plan)
• Safety Management System (SMS) Concept Outline
• You must be able to link the SCR assignment to Assignment 4 so you can effectively
present your findings.
• Google “Safety Case Report Template” to find templates to use as a GUIDE ONLY If we find you
copying information without appropriate referencing you will be refe
ed for Academic Misconduct
• The assignment structure is in a report format as per the SCU Report Guide. Additionally the
intention of this assignment is to give you some flexibility in developing your own Safety Case
Report format taking into consideration the information already provided. It is up to you as the “
Engineering Manager” to determine the co
ect format given the industry you are working in.
• Follow the Ru
ic carefully. HINT: The way you structure your report will determine the marks you
eceive in the Structure Section of the Marking Ru
ic
• Categorize and prioritize the risks in your last Risk Matrix. You should have a list of (Very High,
High, Medium, & Low) As your final Residual Risk Score. Discuss your mitigation decisions, use
academic and industry referencing as much as possible. Don’t just run with bare minimum on the
number of academic references per the marking ru
ic. The more references you use both direct
and in-text will result in a higher quality report and higher marks, overall.
• Review all scenario updates and re-check your risk matrix to see if it all makes sense.
CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19
Additional Information
Overview of Scenario Updates
CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19
Week Scenario Update
Week 1
Principal Scenario: You are the Engineering Manager for a large Ship building company assigned to a new Submarine building program. The Program scope is to execute the build of a fleet of
conventional diesel powered Submarines for your countries Navy. One of your main duties is to manage the Risk Assessment Matrix for the program relating to the engineering and build of the
submarines electrical, mechanical, communications and environmental monitoring systems. In week 1 you will have an outline of some of the initial risks from a kick off risk workshop. Each
Week you will receive project updates and you will need to extract any known or identified risks and update the risk matrix accordingly.
Week 2
The project is mid flight and you have started to receive the initial pre-fa
icated materials for the submarine hull and platform construction. The submarine is built in modular sections and
equires a large amount of heavy lifting equipment, welding specialists, and metal testing professionals. Additionally you have been advised by your security manager that there have been
targeted protests posted online however no specific information relating to date and time has been published.
Week 3
You have employed a team of 6 new electrical engineers to provide design input into the submarines new electrical control systems. These systems are highly complex and the project intends
on implementing a new Artifical Inteligence Safety system. The original design requirements were not clearly set out and you are intending on calling a meeting with the head engineer to clarify
the overall system requirements
Week 4
The Mechanical engineers have advised that there are issues with the new diesel generators being installed onboard the submarines and require full removal for rectification. Cu
ently they
have been fully installed and the hulls have been welded in on the first 2 submarines and the remaining 8 submarines are in line for installation. The diesel generators will need to be shipped
ack to the manufacturer in Germany for repair with a turn around time of 6-9 weeks per diesel.
Week 5
You are now 12 months into the program and the environmental management systems are being installed into the first 5 submarine hulls. These include Ca
on Dioxide converters, Oxygen
Generators and Desalination plants. You have been advised by the WHS and human engineering department that the Desalination systems have not yet been fully tested in your local region
and they are unsure of the performance of these systems when used in different climatic conditions. Additionally you have been made aware by procurement that there has been a major
natural disaster event at the manufacturing factory for the Oxygen Generators and the suppler is unable to provide any details on the next shipments of the devices. You have cu
ently
eceived 50% of the Oxygen Generators needed for the whole fleet.
Week 6
During the construction process an electrical fire has
oken out in the main electrical component room of the submarine during initial system integration testing. This has resulted in severe
injury to five electrical technicians and the Electrical Engineering Supervisor. The investigation into the incident has found that somehow counterfeit electrical components were installed into
the electrical systems.
Week 7
Project is now mid flight and after recent Federal elections there has been a change in Government from the highly supportive Liberal government to a combined Nation First /
Environmentalist Government. The new Government has undertaken a review of the cu
ent project and are considering to de-scope the build of the last three submarines. This has resulted in
the project schedule being cut by 25% and loss of over $12 billion of contracts
Week 8
Local Government pressure has increased on the construction company to employ as many local people as possible whils the project still maintains viability. The issue is that there is a
fundamental lack of the appropiately skilled workers however the Businesses HR delegates have decided to hire additional local staff to work in Trade and Technical Roles to satisfy the Local
Government Officials
Week 9
Worker Strike action has been threatened to management due to the employment of the unkilled local workers and resulting decrease of site safety. Management is now under immense
pressure to rectify the issues ASAP otherwise there will be a sitewide strike and walkout halting construction of the Submarines.
Week 10
There is real potential due to the previous weeks scenarios that the project is starting to come under significant financial and schedule pressure. Management is considering cutting back on all
unnecessary testing activities including auditing of the supply chain management and design verification activities.
Week 11
Construction of the first Submarine has completed however there have been a number of critical safety test activities that have been cancelled due to increased cost and schedule impacts. It is
expected that the first Submarine will depart the ha
our for sea trials in 3-4 weeks. You have been asked to undertake a full re-view of the cu
ent risks and determine if the Submarine is safe
to set sail for this highly important project milestone.
CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19
• New Due Date: 06 October XXXXXXXXXX:00pm (No exceptions or Extensions unless
under exceptional circumstances)
• No further information updates will be released for this assignment
• Good Luck
Final Notes
CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19
Authors Dr Jeremy Novak, Mr James Palmer, Mr George Mattamana, and Mr Sebi Abi
MEM/MBA Program
Page 1 of 3
CMM XXXXXXXXXX: Risk and Resilience
Engineering
Assessment 3 Safety Case Report
Assignment One Requirements:
Due Date: 06 October XXXXXXXXXX:00pm
Length: 2500 words =/- 10%
Format: Word document
Weighting: 35% of total unit marks
Submission: Through turn it in the Assessment Details section of the unit Black Board site.
Referencing Harvard
Assignment Brief
You are to write a Safety Case Report reflecting on the Risk Matrix that you have completed
in Weeks 2-11. You are to incorporate items discussed in the RE workshops as part of this
eport. The body of the report will be structured by you to achieve the best possible
communication with the reader. Your intended audience is senior executives and other
external senior stakeholders relating to safety and risk management.
The report also needs to include:
SCU Cover-sheet: This is the cover-sheet that SCU requires all students to place on the front
of all Assignments.
Title-page: The title-page is the page that all authors put on the reports and submissions that
they write as professionals.
Contains a Title e.g. “Safety Case Report on Risk Management Issues and Mitigations”
Title: Contains the name of the author i.e. you. Contains the File Name and Version number
of the report, Contains the date the report was completed
Header & Footer: The Header must contain your name and your student number. The
Footer must contain the Unit number i.e. CMM92001 and the page number (Page numbering
commences after the title-page), your full name and your student number (first name, second
name, student number). You must save your Word document as your first name last name
and student number. For example Fred_Smith_12345.
Academic References: For the purposes of this report you will need to provide a minimum
of 5 Academic References that you need to connect to Risk Management and Resilience in
Engineering. Failure to provide a minimum of 5 references will incur a max 40% mark of this
portion of the assignment.
Authors Dr Jeremy Novak, Mr James Palmer, Mr George Mattamana, and Mr Sebi Abi MEM/MBA Program
Page 2 of 3
Marking Ru
ic for Assignment 1 (Safety Case Report)
Excellent
85%‒100%
Very Good
75%‒84%
Good
65%‒74%
Satisfactory
50%‒64%
Unacceptable
0%‒49%
Response to assigned topic, the understanding of relevant literature, theory, and assignment Structure:: (about 75% of total mark for the assignment)
Structure:
The Safety Case Report was
very comprehensive and had
excellent structure with no
e
ors.
The Safety Case Report was
comprehensive and had very
good structure with some
e
ors.
The Safety Case Report had good
structure. and appropriate content
ut with some e
ors.
The Safety Case Report consisted of
suitable information, had generally
suitable structure although some
aspects could have been improved
The Safety Case Report did not
have suitable structure and
information
Response to assigned
topic:
The Safety Case Report
esponded directly to the topic
and to every separate part of
the