Solution
Dr Insiyah R. answered on
Mar 20 2023
Introduction 1
Conclusion 6
Reference 6
Introduction
The primary goal of this assignment is to analyse the idea of the care planning process and its importance in the delivery of health and social care. In the framework of social and medical care, both planning and assessment have significant psychological functions. A significant portion of a worker's decision-making is typically predicated on the idea that they may choose from a large pool of applicants who will be able to execute their jobs more effectively (Poghosyan & Liu,2016). The vast majority of training initiatives aim to improve workers' performance at work. Making the best placement options at work requires planning and review to pinpoint both strengths and weaknesses. This data is utilised in merit-based compensation schemes, feedback, and performance evaluation. As a result, the first section of this essay critically examines the use of theoretical models, methodologies, and tools for planning and assessment in actual working situations (Schulz & Eden,2016). The following section deals with how the care plan is put into practice at work to help individuals get the outcomes they want. The benefits and drawbacks of setting up person-centred care in the workplace are examined in the second part. The last section discusses how, in light of one's own practice, planning for care impacts practitioners, patients, families, and carers. This session will use a case study of an elder care provider in a medical setting as an illustration (Dashtipour & Vidaillet,2016).
One of the most pressing problems the medical care sector is presently dealing with is the question of authorization. Before receiving treatment, the patient must now give informed consent, and he or she does have the option to decline treatment—even if doing so may save their life. This unquestionably raises many ethical issues and is the basis of cu
ent medical law. This assignment will go through Mrs Maisie's need for legal consent and medicine recommendations (Dashtipour & Vidaillet,2016).
Everybody with mental capacity has the right to decide what to do with their own body. This indicates that people deserve the opportunity to consent to treatment, refuse to authorise therapy for any reason or withdraw permission regardless of the possibility that doing so will cause them severe damage or death (Grossman et a,2018). These ideas are reflected in the legislation that governs authorisation for medical treatment. In principle, no procedure may be ca
ied out without first getting the patient's permission or, in the case of mental incompetence, the patient's replacement decision-maker. Whenever an operation, procedure, or therapy is recommended, the patient or, in the case of a patient who lacks capacity, the patient's substitute decision-maker must generally approve it (Bales,2017). Whenever an operation, procedure, or therapy is recommended, the patient or, in the case of a patient who lacks capacity, the patient's substitute decision-maker, must generally approve it. If this wasn't done, the medical staff who gave the care might be charged with assault and abuse even if the surgery didn't harm the patient.
Mrs Maisie's head hit during the fall caused her to become disoriented to the person and confused about the time and location (Dashtipour & Vidaillet,2016). Adults are legally presumed to have the capacity to consent to or reject medical treatment unless otherwise indicated. It is improper to draw conclusions about a patient's capability or aptitude based on their diagnosis or condition. For instance, if the information is provided to a patient with an intellectual disability in an acceptable manner or with a suitable amount of assistance, they may be competent to decide on their own medical treatment in relation to "reasonable adjustments" in favour of open and accessible services to people with a handicap. Fundamentally, information should be provided in the client's prefe
ed format (Schulz et al,2016). The nature and goal of the medical treatment must be explained to the patients in straightforward terms. Health professionals have a responsibility to thoroughly inform patients about the reason for the surgery, procedure, or therapy, the risks involved, and any possible results, as well as any alternative treatment options. To make sure that the patient can comprehend the information given to them as part of something like the consent process, it is essential to consider their level of health literacy. These criteria address the proper use of various communication channels and collective decision-making (Sharp, Mcallister & Broadbent,2018).
The gift to Mrs Maisie There may...