Assessment Two – Critical AnalysisAssessment typeCritical analysis Word limit/length 1500 wordsWeighting30% Due date 11:pm Thursday 19th NovemberOverviewIn this assessment exercise you should be able...

Assessment Two – Critical AnalysisAssessment typeCritical analysis Word limit/length 1500 wordsWeighting30% Due date 11:pm Thursday 19th NovemberOverviewIn this assessment exercise you should be able to provide us with evidence you understand what kinds of therapeutic interventions are available for people living with mental illness in Australia. The exercise is designed to encourage you to explore the research evidence-base that informs best practice in treatment of mental illness.To take as an example from the physical health sciences, according to Patti (2016), gastroesophageal reflux is a prevalent disease worldwide and is increasing because of the epidemic of obesity. Lifestyle modifications, proton pump inhibitors, and laparoscopic fundoplication are proven treatment modalities for this disease while endoscopic procedures have not been proven as effective.Patti MG XXXXXXXXXXAn Evidence-Based Approach to the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. JAMA Surg. 151(1):73-8.We are looking for you to provide us evidence for the best treatment options for a person experiencing a mental illness of your choosing.Learning outcomesThis assessment task is aligned with the following learning outcomes: Identify and critique the policy and funding context of mental health service provision in primary mental health care and non-government organisation sectors. Integrate paradigms of service delivery ranging from the recovery to medical models and how these models translate to the non-government and primary health service delivery to consumers.Assessment detailsChoose a mental health problem commonly encountered in primary care. For the purpose of this assignment consider an uncomplicated diagnosable disorder such as an anxiety disorder, major depression, or bipolar affective disorder. Briefly describe a scenario /NRS83003 Mental Health in Community, Non-Government and Primary Health SettingsPage 9 of 16vignette of a person living with this problem (this may be fictional or based on someone you know).Provide a critical review of evidence based therapeutic interventions available to a person with this condition in the Australian primary care sector. Identify the barriers and enablers they may have in accessing these.The total word count should not exceed 1500 words.Submission formatPlease upload your assessment response as a Word document via Turnitin in Blackboard.NRS83003 Mental Health in Community, Non-Government and Primary Health SettingsPage 10 of 16Assessment Two RubricCriterionMarksHD+HDDCHigh PLow PHigh FLow F Scenario and description of mental illness. Ensure this is an illness typically treated in primary care. 10 Exceptionally well described scenario including very clear description of characteristics of the illness. Clearly an illness that primary care is well positioned to treat. Extremely well described scenario including clear description of characteristics of the illness. Clearly an illness that primary care is well positioned to treat. Scenario well developed and provides good insight into the mental illness chosen. Illness would be appropriately treated in primary care Scenario is adequate, essential, but characteristics of the illness could be more comprehensive Basic scenario. Could do with more substantive development of illness. Uncertainty that illness described would be treated in primary care Very basic scenario. Requires much more substantive development of illness. Significant uncertainty that illness described would be treated in primary care Scenario poorly developed. Poorly described illness. Unlikely the illness could be treated in primary care Scenario not attempted or only very poorly done. If described at all, illness very poorly described. No attempt to clarify whether the illness could be treated in primary care Critical analysis of the literature for therapeutic interventions for the nominated mental illness. 40 Exceptionally comprehensive set of treatment options identified Very relevant and recent papers are reviewed. The articles reviewed are very clearly inter-related and build upon each other to show how we have Comprehensive set of treatment options are identified Relevant papers are reviewed. The articles reviewed are clearly inter-related and build upon each other to show how we have progressed to the current best practice. Appropriate set of treatment options are identified A good general review of the literature is included, covering most relevant current papers. Papers reviewed are cohesive and inter-related. Some treatment options are identified. Some review of the literature in support of treatments is identified. Paper identified somewhat relevant and related. Only one or inappropriate treatment option identified. Limited review of the literature, some papers may not be relevant Inappropriate treatment option identified. Very limited review of the literature, many papers may not be relevant No attempt at evidence based-treatments provided. No attempt review relevant literature. No attempt or very poor attempt at evidence based-treatments provided. No attempt review relevant literature.NRS83003 Mental Health in Community, Non-Government and Primary Health SettingsPage 11 of 16CriterionMarksHD+HDDCHigh PLow PHigh FLow F progressed to the current best practice. Identification of enablers and barriers to accessing these interventions. 30 Extraordinarily comprehensive description of a number of enablers and barriers to access to treatment. Considers an extensive set of biopsychosocial determinants that are appropriately related to the scenario Comprehensive description of a number of enablers and barriers to access to treatment. Considers all biopsychosocial determinants that are appropriately related to the scenario Good description of the enablers and barriers to treatment for the mental illness described in the scenario. Considers multiple determinants Some description of enablers and barriers that are somewhat related to the scenario though not fully developed. Only one or limited enablers/barriers identified and described. No evidence that these are related to original scenario Only one or limited enablers/barriers identified and described. No evidence that these are related to original scenario Very poor attempt to identify and describe enablers and barriers to treatment No attempt or very poor attempt to identify and describe enablers and barriers to treatment Writing Spelling & Grammar Referencing 20 Exceptionally clear, crisp and coherent style. Exceptionally well organised. Completely free of grammar and spelling errors. All citations follow required style. Clear, crisp and coherent style. Very well organised. Free of grammar and spelling errors. All citations follow required style. Clear, coherent style. Well organised. Mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors. Citations follow required style. Small errors. Good style. Competently written. Structure is clear. A few grammatical errors. Most citations follow required style. Some errors. Writing is adequate. Structure could be clearer. Grammatical errors. Some citations follow required style. Errors. Writing is adequate. Structure could be significantly clearer. Numerous grammatical errors. Some citations follow required style. Errors. Poor style with little attention to spelling and punctuation. Poorly structured. Not written well. Citations do not follow required style. Very poor style with no attention to spelling and punctuation. Very poorly structured. Not written well. Citations not provided.