Assessment Three – Scenario and Mental Health PlanAssessment typeCritical analysis Word limit/length 3000 words (inclusive of references)Weighting60% Due date 11 pm Monday 14th DecemberOverviewThe...

Assessment Three – Scenario and Mental Health PlanAssessment typeCritical analysis Word limit/length 3000 words (inclusive of references)Weighting60% Due date 11 pm Monday 14th DecemberOverviewThe following is a link to a number of different scenarios around mental health issues faced by people. Each scenario reinforces the idea that various mental health problems have a range of causes and solutions.https://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-pubs-r-recons-toc~mental-pubs-r-recons-2~mental-pubs-r-recons-23~mental-pubs-r-recons-233These scenarios range from early stage illness to instances where the mental health issues are much more severe. The early stage scenarios will often benefit from an early intervention approach, which will help stop a major mental health issue from arising. Some are more complex, deep-rooted issues that require more intensive help.These scenarios have been provided only as a guide for the exercise.This assessment exercise has been developed to help you comprehensively explore the treatment options for a person experiencing mental health issues in Australia.Learning outcomesThis assessment task is aligned with the following learning outcomes:• Deconstruct stepped care, its barriers and opportunities and impact on consumers and their families.• Analyse the range of interventions within primary health settings and the impact of these interventions for at least one vulnerable group within the community.• Critically discuss the role of ‘lived experience’ of mental illness and distress in informing policy and practice of mental health care including mutual self-help, peer support and advocacy.NRS83003 Mental Health in Community, Non-Government and Primary Health SettingsPage 13 of 16Assessment detailsFor this final assessment exercise (3000 words) we would like you to do the following (Note that the suggested number of words for each section are a guide only)/:• Develop and write a scenario of a person from a vulnerable group (as defined by your local primary care network) with mental health problems and symptoms of mental illness. In your scenario describe how and when symptoms emerged and the impact they have on the person’s functioning. (300 words)• Describe the person’s likely primary diagnosis and the key symptoms associated with the diagnosis. (300 words)• Write a bio-psycho-social formulation of the person’s problem (300 words)• With reference to the literature describe the ideal evidenced based treatment for this problem or constellation of problems (800 words)• Write a collaborative mental health plan which describes (1000 words):a. Measurable and attainable treatment goals (with time frames)b. Recommended treatment (specify what treatment and by whom)c. Self-help / self-care activitiesd. Community resources the person may access to assist theme. A safety plan with recommended contacts if needing out of hours support• A concluding statement which describes the anticipated trajectory and outcomes (300 words)Note the word count should not exceed 3000 words (the above weightings for each section of the report are recommendations only).Submission formatPlease upload your assessment response as a Word document via Turnitin in Blackboard.NRS83003 Mental Health in Community, Non-Government and Primary Health SettingsPage 14 of 16Assessment Three RubricCriterionMarksHD+HDDCHigh PLow PHigh FLow F Scenario and description of mental illness. 10 Exceptionally well described scenario including very clear description of characteristics of the illness. Extremely well described scenario including clear description of characteristics of the illness. Scenario well developed and provides good insight into the mental illness chosen. Scenario is adequate, essential, but characteristics of the illness could be more comprehensive Basic scenario. Could do with more substantive development of illness. Very basic scenario. Could do with significantly more substantive development of illness. Scenario poorly developed. Poorly described illness. Scenario not developed or very poorly attempted. Description of illness, if attempted, very vague. Primary diagnosis and the key symptoms associated with the diagnosis 10 Key symptoms maps onto primary diagnosis exceptionally well Key symptoms maps onto primary diagnosis extremely well Good link between primary diagnosis and symptoms. Adequate description of most but not all symptoms. Some attempt made to map diagnosis onto symptoms Symptoms described but not in enough detail to make an adequate diagnosis Symptoms very poorly described with insufficient detail to make an adequate diagnosis Symptoms very poorly related to diagnosis No symptoms described or unrelated to illness. Bio-psycho-social formulation of the person’s problems 10 Exceptional and very comprehensive description of determinants contributing towards the person’s mental illness. Makes very clear sense in the scenario Excellent and comprehensive description of determinants contributing towards the person’s mental illness. Makes sense in the scenario Good description of the determinants of mental illness for the person described. Coherent with the scenario developed. Adequate description of determinants of the mental illness experienced by the person. Somewhat appropriate for the scenario described Some description of the determinants of mental illness, could be extensively developed Minimal description of the determinants of mental illness, needs extensive development Very poor attempt to describe the bio-psycho-social determinants of mental illness for the person No attempt to describe the bio-psycho-social determinants of mental illness for the personNRS83003 Mental Health in Community, Non-Government and Primary Health SettingsPage 15 of 16CriterionMarksHD+HDDCHigh PLow PHigh FLow F Critical analysis of the literature for therapeutic interventions for the nominated mental illness. 20 Exceptional set of treatment options are identified Highly relevant papers are reviewed. The articles reviewed are very clearly inter-related and build upon each other to show how we have progressed to the current best practice. Comprehensive set of treatment options are identified Relevant papers are reviewed. The articles reviewed are clearly inter-related and build upon each other to show how we have progressed to the current best practice. Appropriate set of treatment options are identified A good general review of the literature is included, covering most relevant current papers. Papers reviewed are cohesive and inter-related. Some treatment options are identified. Some review of the literature in support of treatments is identified. Paper identified somewhat relevant and related. Only one or inappropriate treatment option identified. Limited review of the literature, some papers may not be relevant Only an inappropriate treatment option identified. Very limited review of the literature, some papers may not be relevant or highly outdated No attempt at evidence based-treatments provided. No attempt review relevant literature. No attempt at any treatments provided. No attempt review any literature. Mental health plan 30 Exceptional mental health plan. A very high chance of success. Comprehensive account of services. Comprehensive development of the mental health plan including all five elements (a..e). Coherent and reasonable plan likely to have high chance of implementation. Identifies all agents that could be deployed in treatment of the person along Well developed mental health care plan taking into consideration many/all of the five elements required (a..e). Includes description of various resources that could be brought into the treatment and management of the person Mental health plan adequately described though not comprehensive, May not fully describe all five elements that are required (a..e). Limited attempt to develop a metal health care plan. May only address one or a few of the five elements required (a..e). Very limited attempt to develop a metal health care plan. Minimal attempt to address one or fewer of the five elements required (a..e). Very poor attempt to develop a mental health plan. Little or no evidence of exploring any of the required components (a..e). No attempt to develop a mental health plan. No evidence of exploring any of the required components (a..e).NRS83003 Mental Health in Community, Non-Government and Primary Health SettingsPage 16 of 16CriterionMarksHD+HDDCHigh PLow PHigh FLow F the spectrum from community resources through to specialised primary care options. Concluding statement 10 Anticipated trajectory of the person is exceptionally well described with inclusion of a very detailed set of outcomes than might be expected in substantive recovery Anticipated trajectory of the person is very well described with inclusion of a detailed set of outcomes than might be expected in substantive recovery Very good description of the expected trajectory of recovery and outcomes following treatment. Adequate description of trajectory following treatment. Some discussion of outcomes but could be further developed. Limited description of outcomes following treatment and the anticipated trajectory of the person. Very poor description of outcomes following treatment and the anticipated trajectory of the person. Needs significantly further work. Very poor/no attempt to describe outcomes and trajectory of the person after treatment, No attempt to describe outcomes and trajectory of the person after treatment, Writing Spelling & Grammar Referencing 10 Exceptionally clear, crisp and coherent style. Exceptionally well organised. Completely free of grammar and spelling errors. All citations follow required style. Clear, crisp and coherent style. Very well organised. Free of grammar and spelling errors. All citations follow required style. Clear, coherent style. Well organised. Mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors. Citations follow required style. Small errors. Good style. Competently written. Structure is clear. A few grammatical errors. Most citations follow required style. Some errors. Writing is adequate. Structure could be clearer. Grammatical errors. Some citations follow required style. Errors. Writing is adequate. Structure could be significantly clearer. Numerous grammatical errors. Some citations follow required style. Errors. Poor style with little attention to spelling and punctuation. Poorly structured. Not written well. Citations do not follow required style. Very poor style with no attention to spelling and punctuation. Very poorly structured. Not written well. Citations not provided