Grade Mark | HD 40-50 | DI 35-39 | CR 30-34 | P 25-29 | Fail |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Project scope | Concise and specific to the project | Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. | Generally relevant and analysed. | Some relevance and briefly presented. | This is not relevant to the assignment topic. |
Project hardware requirements | Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately | Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately | Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately | Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately | Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately |
Network Design in Netsim | Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments | Consistency logical and convincing | Mostly consistent logical and convincing | Adequate cohesion and conviction | Argument is confused and disjointed |
Network device configurations – Switch configuration | All elements are present and very well integrated. | Components present with good cohesive | Components present and mostly well integrated | Most components present | Proposal lacks structure. |
Network device Configurations – Router configuration | All elements are present and very well integrated. | Components present with good cohesive | Components present and mostly well integrated | Most components present | Proposal lacks structure. |
Demonstration | Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments | Consistency logical and convincing | Mostly consistent logical and convincing | Adequate cohesion and conviction | Argument is confused and disjointed |
IEEE Reference style | Clear styles with excellent source of references. | Clear referencing style | Generally good Referencing style | Sometimes clear referencing style | Lacks consistency with many errors |