ASSESSMENT BRIEFSubject Code and TitlePUBH6006: Community Health and Disease...

Question

ASSESSMENT BRIEFSubject Code and TitlePUBH6006: Community Health and Disease PreventionAssessmentAssessment 3: Plan - Emergency ResponseIndividual/GroupIndividualLength1,500 words (+/- 10%)Learning OutcomesThis assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:Examine concept of health emergency preparedness and responseAnalyse the health emergency plan in crisis situations.Integrate health promotion theories and public health frameworks to into practiceDemonstrate clear and assertive communication across a range of settings and situationsSubmissionDue: End of Module 6, Sunday of week 12 at 11:55pm*Weighting30%Total Marks100 marks*Please Note: This time is Sydney time (AEST or AEDT).Please convert to your own time zone (e.g. Adelaide = 11:25pm)PUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020 Page1of5InstructionsRead the scenario of public health emergency provided by your lecturer and develop a report draw from your critical analysis and applying theory into practice.The scenario will be provided separately.Use appropriate data and information to critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency.Critical analysis an existing emergency response plan that have been implemented in the given scenario and identify the area that could be improved or changed.Propose recommendations for improving the existing emergency response plan; or to developing future plan based on the given scenario. Discuss the potential stakeholders who should be involved in your recommended emergency response plan.Please read the guidance on how to develop this assessment in the template.It is compulsory to use the assessment template which is attached with the scenario of assessment 3.Public Health ProgramPUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020 Page2of5Assessment CriteriaPublic Health ProgramCriteria MarkCritically explain and analyse the given public health emergency by using appropriate20%information and relevant data.Critically analyse the existing emergency response plan and identify the area of35%improvement for public health practice in the scenario context.Apply conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the35%existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation.Assessment fulfils general academic standards and general criteria.10%Use assessment templateProvide an introduction and conclusionComply with academic standards of writing, including legibility, spelling, presentationand grammarIncludes at least 10‐12 scholarly sources for this assessment.Use appropriate APA 6thstyle for citing and referencing researchUphold standards of academic integrity, as demonstrated by an acceptable report from text matching software (Safe Assign).Format:Use specific template for this assessmentUse headings as suggested in the templateFont style :Arial or TahomaFont size:10 for paragraph, 12 for headingsFont colour:BlackSpace:1.5DO NOTinclude running head, table of content, executive summary/abstractFigures and tablesAll figures and tables derived from other works must be presented with citation using APA 6thstylePUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020 Page3of5Marking RubricPublic Health ProgramAssessment AttributesFail (Unacceptable) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional XXXXXXXXXX%Grade Description(Grading Scheme)Evidence of unsatisfactory achievementEvidence of satisfactory achievementEvidence of a good level of achievementEvidence of a high level of achievementEvidence of an exceptional level of achievementCritically explain and analyse the given public health emergency by using appropriate information and relevant data20%The assessment does not demonstrate an ability to critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency by using appropriate information and relevant dataThe assessment present limited ability to critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency.This is overly descriptive and needs more supported evidence.The assessment presents a critical explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data.The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.The assessment presents an excellent explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data.The analysis is very well explained and justified with credible evidence.The assessment contains a highly sophisticated explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data.The analysis is expertly explained and well justified by relevant and high-quality evidence from credible sources.Critically analyse the existing emergency response plan and identify the area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context.35%The student does not demonstrate an ability to critically analyse the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.The area of improvement for public health practice is not identified.The student demonstrates limited ability to critically analyse the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is not clearly identified.This is overly descriptive and needs more supported evidence.The student presents a good critical analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified.The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.The student presents an excellent critical analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified.The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.The student presents a highly sophisticated analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified.The analysis is expertly explained and well justified by relevant and high-quality evidence from credible sourcesPUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020Page4of5Marking Rubric(continued)Public Health ProgramAssessment AttributesGrade Description(Grading Scheme)Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49%Evidence of unsatisfactory achievementPass (Functional) 50-64%Evidence of satisfactory achievementCredit (Proficient) 65-74%Evidence of a good level of achievementDistinction (Advanced) 75-84%Evidence of a high level of achievementHigh Distinction (Exceptional XXXXXXXXXX%Evidence of an exceptional level of achievementThe student does not demonstrate an ability to apply conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation.The student demonstrates limited ability to apply conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation. The recommendation is overly descriptive and needs more supported evidence.The student presents a good application of conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation. The recommendation is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.The student presents an excellent application of conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation. The recommendation is very well explained and justified with relevant and credible evidenceThe student presents a highly sophisticated application of conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation.The recommendation is expertly explained and well justified by relevant and high-quality evidence from credible sourcesApply conceptualframework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation.35%Assessment fulfils general academic standards and general criteria.Using assessment template.10%Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. The assessment has no introduction or conclusion. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.There are mistakes in using the APA style.Written according to academic genre (i.e., introduction, main body, and conclusion).Use assessment template. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.There are some mistakes in using the APA style.Well written and adheres to the academic genre (i.e., introduction, main body, and conclusion).Use assessment template. Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.There are no mistakes in using the APA style.Very well written and adheres to the academic genre.Use assessment template. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading.There are no mistakes in using the APA style.Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre.Use assessment template. Demonstrates expert use of high‐quality and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading.There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.‐‐PUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020Page5of5

Parul · Accepted Answer

Community Health and Disease Prevention
Community Health and Disease Prevention 
(Title of your assignment)
Assessment 3: PUBH6006: Please add your Name and Student ID
Introduction
The Eastern Australian Floods in 2021 have been reported to be one of the most lethal and devastating disasters that has occurred in Australia in over six decades. It is a sad plight Flood has become an annual event in Australia, which impose substantial social, economic and environmental costs on the communities.
· Direct damage to residential, educational, commercial, cultural and recreational industrial infrastructure
· Damage to equipment, stock and facilities for instance farm animals, commercial stock and records
· There are also indirect damages due to disruption of economic activities both are in the areas that are inundated as well as areas that were isolated.
· Injury of Death
As per reports Cappucci and Pannett (2021) certain parts of Australia is already around 35 inches of rain. Furthermore, scientists strongly believe that these floods represents hazards that are projecting new environmental hazard patterns. (Cave, 2021). All across the year, overall temperature of Australia is warmer by 1.4 degree Celsius that results into severe droughts there by causing more water vapors to rise in the atmosphere. Deep diving into facts it can be observed that majority of the flooding have been seem to be occurred away from the shores rather more towards inland throughout the rivers. While floods have swamped the country however, the most affected city is the state of New South Wales that has seen primary damages towards both livestock and people.
Taking into consideration flood footprints and statistics in Australia, it’s been observed that 525 different level 1 areas had reported tremendous flooding. Therefore, this covers population of 218,128, which was affected within 525 statistical areas. One of the primary factors for these catastrophic floods is climate change. 
Context of the Public Health Emergency
Applying the approach to health emergency preparedness as well as response in this case was top-down. Existing initiatives that came into picture during the floods in Australia displayed that government was perhaps not prepared for flood of this intensity and magnitude. Australia was in the peculiar condition that caused the risk of the hazard of flood to worsen since the fires has occurred prior. If the fires were controlled or perhaps didn’t occur then it would be possible that the government and various communities may have, received better support and thereby better response to the floods. Federal government in Australia activated disaster relief for flood-affected NSW residents. Citizens who were significantly injured or had lost their homes or perhaps had their homes damaged will be entitled to $1,000 AUD for adults or $400 AUD for young children. With the sheer intensity and massiveness of these floods, Australian government was perhaps overwhelming and reactive with their response. Besides the reactive measures, they were able to conduct more than 700 rescues. Essentially, flood response operations in NSW, Australia could consist of 
· Distributing flood-related information and warnings to the community
· Ensuring important services are provided to people and such services were maintained or perhaps quickly re-established at ground level.
· Maintaining necessary access routes
· Ensuring maintaining,

ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6006: Community Health and Disease Prevention Assessment Assessment 3: Plan - Emergency Response Individual/Group Individual Length 1,500 words (+/- 10%)...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment

ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title	PUBH6006: Community Health and Disease Prevention
Assessment	Assessment 3: Plan - Emergency Response
Individual/Group	Individual
Length	1,500 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes	This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: Examine concept of health emergency preparedness and response Analyse the health emergency plan in crisis situations. Integrate health promotion theories and public health frameworks to into practice Demonstrate clear and assertive communication across a range of settings and situations
Submission	Due: End of Module 6, Sunday of week 12 at 11:55pm*
Weighting	30%
Total Marks	100 marks

Assessment Attributes	Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49%	Pass (Functional) 50-64%	Credit (Proficient) 65-74%	Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%	High Distinction (Exceptional XXXXXXXXXX%
Grade Description (Grading Scheme)	Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement	Evidence of satisfactory achievement	Evidence of a good level of achievement	Evidence of a high level of achievement	Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement
Critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency by using appropriate information and relevant data 20%	The assessment does not demonstrate an ability to critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency by using appropriate information and relevant data	The assessment present limited ability to critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency. This is overly descriptive and needs more supported evidence.	The assessment presents a critical explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data. The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.	The assessment presents an excellent explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data. The analysis is very well explained and justified with credible evidence.	The assessment contains a highly sophisticated explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data. The analysis is expertly explained and well justified by relevant and high-quality evidence from credible sources.
Critically analyse the existing emergency response plan and identify the area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context. 35%	The student does not demonstrate an ability to critically analyse the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario. The area of improvement for public health practice is not identified.	The student demonstrates limited ability to critically analyse the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario. The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is not clearly identified. This is overly descriptive and needs more supported evidence.	The student presents a good critical analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario. The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified. The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.	The student presents an excellent critical analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario. The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified. The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.	The student presents a highly sophisticated analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario. The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified. The analysis is expertly explained and well justified by relevant and high-quality evidence from credible sources