ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title
PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy
Assessment
Assessment 2: Policy Analysis Essay
Individual/Group
Individual
Length
2000 words (+/‐) 10%)
This assessment addresses the following learning
outcomes:
Learning Outcomes
Analyse different theories and approaches to policy
agenda setting
Apply knowledge of policy development to a public
health policy issue
Analyse issues in contemporary Australian health
care policy
Develop processes for the evaluation of and
accountability for policy
Critique the role of networks and coalitions in the
policy agenda setting process
Submission
week 8 at 11.55pm*
Instructions:
In this Assessment, you will engage in policy analysis. Choose a health policy (either cu
ent or past),
either at the state or federal level, to analyse in this Assignment (eg, mental health policy, women’s health policy, preventative health policy, men’s health policy, Aboriginal and To
es Strait Islander health policy).
The Assignment should be approximately 2,000 words (+/‐ 10%) and presented in essay form. Address the following questions in your Assessment but please do not answer the questions as a series of short answers:
Firstly, provide a short introduction to your essay. Then proceed to analyse your chosen policy, and in doing so, consider the following issues:
The Problem and Context
•Describe the cu
ent and historical policy context of the problem. •What is the problem which the policy seeks to address?
What problems are highlighted?
•What problems have been overlooked?
Frame of Reference/Dominant Discourse
•What is the common frame of reference or dominant discourse evidence within this policy? •Are certain words and phrases commonly used? •Are there any underlying assumptions behind these?
Targets, Stakeholders and their Representation
•Who is the target of the policy (the subject of the discourse)?
•Who are the other stakeholders identified in the policy? Describe key institutional structures, agencies and workforce capacity building.
•How are the subjects of the policy being represented?
•How are different social groups portrayed in this policy and what implications does this have? •Are there any moral judgements expressed in this representation?
Policy process
•Who were the stakeholders involved in the development of the policy? Who was overlooked?
•Whose interests were represented in the development of the policy? Which voices were not heard? •What were the potential competing interests and power differentials of those involved
in the development of the policy?
•What was the motivation for stakeholders in creating this policy?
•Were there any particular windows of opportunity that enabled the development of this policy?
Policy Solutions
•What solutions are put forward to address the problems? What alternative solutions might have been overlooked? •Are there any social/powe
ethical implications of this policy?
Effectiveness
•Consider the implementation of the policy. How effectively do you think the cu
ent policy has been implemented? •What are the accountability processes for the policy?
•Consider evaluation measures (indicators) and any evaluation which has been undertaken.
•How effective has the policy proven to be?
Finally, finish your essay with a conclusion.
Assessment Criteria:
Knowledge and understanding of the policy issue (30%)
Critical analysis of the problem, frames of reference used, the policy process and policy solutions (30%)
Application and synthesis of knowledge about policy theories (25%)
General Assessment Criteria (15%) Assessment fulfills general academic standards, including: Provide an introduction and conclusion
Complies with academic standards of writing, including legibility, clarity, accurate spelling, presentation and grammar.
Uses appropriate APA 6 style for citing and referencing research
Upholds standards of academic integrity, as demonstrated by acceptable report from text‐matching software (e.g Safe Assign).