This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Introduction to self (video) - max 4 marks A 30-second recording of your professional introduction is uploaded to Padlet.
|
4
to >3.0
Pts Full marks - Excellent Clearly and professionally introduces self by name, includes key aspects (eg nursing student at the Uni of Canberra), and uses eye contact and facial expressions to engage the audience. The timeframe is adhered to.
|
3
to >2.0
Pts Proficient Clearly introduces self by name, and includes key aspects of a professional introduction. May still be developing an aspect of confidence, articulation, or facial engagement. The time frame is adhered to.
|
2
to >1.0
Pts Sufficient Clearly introduces self by name, and includes key aspects of a professional introduction. May still be developing confidence, articulation, or facial engagement. The time frame is not within 10% +/-
|
1
to >0.0
Pts Developing An introduction to self is not submitted, or an introduction is included of limited professionalism or poor verbal delivery. Timing is not adhered to.
|
0
Pts No marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
4
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
200 words nursing philosophy (Word document) - max 8 marks A written summary of your nursing philosophy in 200 words (+/- 10%). (Max 8 marks)
|
8
to >7.5
Pts Full marks - Excellent Provides a reflective, thoughtful nursing philosophy that includes nursing theoretical frameworks in relation to a personal values-based and relational approach. Nursing theory or NMBA Codes and RN Standards for Practice are appropriately referenced.
|
7.5
to >6.0
Pts Proficient Provides a considered and coherent nursing philosophy that reflects a personal approach.
|
6
to >4.0
Pts Sufficient Describes a nursing philosophy in simple and general terms. The writing inconsistently reflects a personal approach.
|
4
to >0.0
Pts Developing The nursing philosophy is not included or does not meet a word count within 10% of the 200-word limit.
|
0
Pts No marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
8
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
A recorded oral reflection using Gibb’s Reflective cycle on feedback from Assessment Three Developing a Nursing Persona essay. (Including rubric mark) – (Voice recording) max 8 marks A verbal reflection using Gibb's reflective approach on any feedback received (including rubric mark) from the Assessment Three essay, and how this will influence your future essay writing in your degree (3 minutes (+/- 10%). (Max 8 marks)
|
8
to >7.5
Pts Full marks - Excellent A confident and clearly articulated oral reflection on feedback provided on the Assessment Three essay is demonstrated. Gibb’s reflective cycle is neatly embedded, with each element of Gibb’s cycle structure apparent. The student articulately highlights what they will do differently in future study approaches and essay writing. The timeframe is adhered to.
|
7.5
to >6.0
Pts Proficient Coherent and engaging delivery of reflection on feedback provided on Assessment three essay. The reflection demonstrates the structure of Gibb’s reflective cycle that is clearly embedded in the reflection. The student clearly highlights what they will do differently in future study approaches and essay writing. The timeframe is adhered to.
|
6
to >4.0
Pts Sufficient The student outlines feedback on the Assessment Three essay and demonstrates a reflection using the structure of Gibb’s reflective cycle. The timeframe is not adhered to within 10% +/-.
|
4
to >0.0
Pts Developing There is no or minimal reflection, and the structure of Gibb’s reflective cycle is unclear. Timing is not adhered to.
|
0
Pts No marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
8
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
A mind map connecting nursing professional regulatory components with Australian healthcare structures and systems (Word document)- max 8 marks A one (1) page mind map connecting nursing professional regulatory components with Australian healthcare structures and systems. A second page may be added for references formatted in the APA 7th edition style. (Max 8 marks)
|
8
to >7.5
Pts Full marks - Excellent The mind map illustrates persuasive connections between key elements of the Australian healthcare systems and structures. The mind map is supported by engagement with high-quality evidence presented as references using the APA 7th edition style formatting. The mind map links are presented in a way that demonstrates thoughtful, deliberate, and nuanced understanding.
|
7.5
to >6.0
Pts Proficient The mind map is considered and coherently presented, and key components of the Australian healthcare structures and systems are clearly linked.
|
6
to >4.0
Pts Sufficient The mind map is mostly coherently presented, components of the Australian healthcare structures and systems are included but links may not be clear.
|
4
to >0.0
Pts Developing The mind map is not present or not connected, or key components are not present.
|
0
Pts No marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
8
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Symbolic storytelling - using any media (writing, video, art) to express how the cultural and political paradigms in Australia have influenced you. Include reflection on how this may affect the development of your nursing persona. - max 4 marks Symbolic storytelling - using any media (writing, video, art, poetry, sculpture) to express how the cultural and political paradigms in Australia have influenced you. Include reflection (written, verbal or video) of how this may affect the development of your nursing persona. (Max 4 marks)
|
4
to >3.0
Pts Full marks - Excellent Presents a thoughtful, deliberate, and nuanced symbolic storytelling related to cultural and political concepts. Reflection on the development of a nursing persona is persuasive and engaging.
|
3
to >2.0
Pts Proficient A symbolic story is presented, cultural and political concepts are outlined, and their impact on the development of a professional nursing identify is reflected upon. (eg 'this is the symbol I chose and why', and 'this is why is this important to the development of my nursing persona'.
|
2
to >1.0
Pts Sufficient Cultural and political concepts are identified. Some reflective process is documented (eg 'This is the symbol I chose and why', and 'This is why is this important to the development of my nursing persona').
|
1
to >0.0
Pts Developing Symbolic storytelling is not submitted or lacks detail, reflection, or clarity.
|
0
Pts No marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
4
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
A one (1) page Curriculum Vitae (resume) (following elements of the template provided but a personal document can be developed) (Word document)- max 4 marks A one (1) page Curriculum Vitae (resume) (following elements of the template provided but a personal document can be developed) (Word document)- max 4 marks
|
4
to >3.0
Pts Full marks - Excellent A Curriculum Vitae (resume) is included that is exceptionally well formatted and organised, with all key elements presented to their maximum impact.
|
3
to >2.0
Pts Proficient A Curriculum Vitae (resume) is included that is well organised and carefully formatted all key elements are present.
|
2
to >1.0
Pts Sufficient A Curriculum Vitae (resume) is provided the text is coherent, and key elements such as personal details, qualifications, and work experience are outlined.
|
1
to >0.0
Pts Developing A Curriculum Vitae (resume) is not included, lacks attention to detail or missing key elements.
|
0
Pts No marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
4
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Presentation of e-portfolio - max 4 marks Presentation of e-portfolio - max 4 marks
|
4
to >3.0
Pts Full marks - Excellent Persuasive presentation that indicates understanding and integration of the NMBA Codes of Conduct and the NMBA RN Standards for Practice (Standard 3- Maintains capability for practice).
|
3
to >2.0
Pts Proficient Engaging and attractive presentation, that indicates insight into NMBA Codes of Conduct and the NMBA RN Standards for Practice (Standard 3- Maintains capability for practice). With no errors.
|
2
to >1.0
Pts Sufficient Presented with attention to detail, and minimal spelling or editing errors.
|
1
to >0.0
Pts Developing The ePortfolio is poorly presented, written and structured. There is a lack of organisation. Poor editing or formatting.
|
0
Pts No marks (NX) The presentation indicates a lack of understanding of the assessment task.
|
|
4
pts
|
Total points:
40
|