Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6001 Health Policy and Advocacy Assessment Report:Australian Health Policy Review Individual/Group Individual Length 2,000 words (+/–10%) Learning...

1 answer below »

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF

Subject Code and Title

PUBH6001 Health Policy and Advocacy

Assessment

Report:Australian Health Policy Review

Individual/Group

Individual

Length

2,000 words (+/–10%)

Learning Outcomes

The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by the successful completion of the task below include:

  1. a) Critically analyse different theories and approaches to policy agenda setting to understand health policy formulation and advocacy for a specific population health issue;

  2. b) Critically analyse issues in contemporary Australian health care policy, including the evaluation of global influences on Australian health policy;

  3. c) Critically analyse and reflect on political and ethical issues in the formulation of evidence-based policy and its translation into real-world policy application;

  4. d) Evaluate the role of government and other stakeholders in the processes for ensuring the accountability for health policy and advocating for change.

Submission

Due by 11.55 pm AEST/AEDT on the Sunday at the end of Module 9

Weighting

40%

Total Marks

100 marks

Assessment Task

In this assessment, you will select an Australian strategic level federal or state health policy to critically review. You will write a 2,000-word (+/–10%) report that identifies the main concepts within the policy and relate these concepts back toKingdon’s XXXXXXXXXXmultiple streamstheory. Based on the latest evidence you will then make recommendations for future policy development.

Please refer to the Task Instructions (below) for details on how to complete this task.

Context

As a future public health professional. you will be expected to keep up to date with policy developments in your area of interest (e.g., child health).It is important that you understand what a policy is, the main concepts that comprise a strategic level health policy and how policy theory interacts with the formulation of these important documents.

PUBH6001_Assessment_2_Brief_PolicyReview_Module Due 9Page1of6

In this assessment, you will learn how to effectively search for a contemporary state or federal health policy relating to a specific issue or population group. You will learn how to review policies from the perspective of the theories and concepts that should inform their formulation. You will also learn how to formulate evidence-based policy recommendations to improve health policy outcomes.

Instructions

To complete this task, you must select a public health topic or population group of interest and conduct a search of Australia federal and/or state websites to find a relevant policy to review. Your policy selection needs to be approved by your learning facilitator.

Once your policy is approved, you will perform a policy review that includes the following components:

  • An introduction.

  • A definition of policy as per the core course readings.

  • Details of the search strategy and criteria used to select your area of interest and chosen

    health policy to review, including any challenges.

  • A description of each of the key policy elements (see list below) and an application of

    Kingdon’s multiple streams theory(including the problem, policy and political streams; policy stakeholders and/or policy entrepreneurs and if applicable, the window of opportunity):

oMinisterialforward;oVisionstatement;
oGoals;
oObjectives;

oStrategies;and
oOther concepts of interest.

Note: You must provide examples using relevant quotations from the policy.

•Evidence-based recommendations that highlight further areas of consideration or improvement for future policy development. For example, consider:

oWhatarethepolicysilences?
oWhatismissing?
oIs the ministerial forward and/or vision statement consistent with the strategies

outlined in the policy?•Conclusions.

This Australian Health Policy Review is to be presented in a report style, you need to reference both your chosen policy and any additional primary or secondary research used. For more information on report writing, visit: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap/reports

PUBH6001_Assessment_2_Brief_PolicyReview_Module Due 9Page2of6

Referencing

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in theAcademic Skills webpage.

Submission Instructions
Submit this task via theAssessment 2link in the main navigation menu inPUBH6001: Health Policy

and Advocacy. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal.

Academic Integrity

All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to theAcademic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These areviewable online.

Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.

PUBH6001_Assessment_2_Brief_PolicyReview_Module Due 9Page3of6

Assessment Rubric

Assessment Attributes

Fail
(Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49%

Pass (Functional) 50–64%

Credit (Proficient) 65–74%

Distinction (Advanced) 75–84%

High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100%

Knowledge and understanding of health policy.

Defines policy as per the core course readings.

Selects an appropriate strategic level of Australian health policy.

Lists, expands and comments on essential elements of the selected health policy.

Percentage for this criterion = 35%

Inappropriate choice of a strategic level of an Australian health policy.

Understanding of the definition and function of health policy not demonstrated.

The review of the chosen health policy is not provided and/or not supported by evidence.

A strategic level of an Australian health policy has been chosen; however, more relevant options could have been considered.

Limited understanding of the definition and function of health policy demonstrated. The review of the chosen health policy is inadequate and/or only supported by limited evidence.

Appropriate choice of a strategic level of an Australian health policy.

Understanding of the definition and function of health policy demonstrated.

A review of the chosen health policy that is well supported by evidence.

Relevant choice of a strategic level of an Australian health policy.

Impressive understanding of the definition and function of health policy demonstrated.

A comprehensive review of the chosen health policy that is well supported by quality evidence.

Highly relevant choice of a strategic level of an Australian health policy.

Sophisticated understanding of the definition and function of health policy demonstrated.
An exceptional review of the chosen health policy that is well supported by high-quality evidence.

Critically analyses the selected health policyin relation to Kingdon’smultiple stream theory including problems,

Application of Kingdon’s multiple streams theory in the policy review is very limited and demonstrates a lack of understanding of

Applicationof Kingdon’smultiple streams theory in the policy review is very limited and demonstrates an inadequate understanding of

Application ofKingdon’smultiple streams theory in the policy review is good, but more detail is required. The analysis demonstrates

Application ofKingdon’smultiple streams theory in the policy review is effective and demonstrates an impressive

Application ofKingdon’smultiple streams theory in the policy review is highly effective and demonstrates a sophisticated

SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due#Page4of6

Answered Same Day Nov 12, 2021

Solution

Insha answered on Nov 13 2021
117 Votes
Running Head: PUBH6001 HEALTH POLICY AND ADVOCACY            1
PUBH6001 HEALTH POLICY AND ADVOCACY                    
PUBH6001 HEALTH POLICY AND ADVOCACY
POLICIES PERSPECTIVE ON AUSTRALIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Abstract of Policy    3
Research Criteria    4
Key Elements of Policy    4
Ministerial Forward    4
Vision Statement    5
Goals    5
Objectives    5
Strategies    6
Public Health Insurance    6
Role of Public Hospitals    6
Application of Kingdon’s Theory    6
Kingdon’s Model: Key Issues and Problem Stream    6
Kingdon’s Model: Policy and Politics Stream    7
Evidence-Based Recommendations    8
Conclusion    10
References    11
Introduction
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the Australian medical care system and compare it to similar systems in other countries in order to highlight the major concerns and challenges. The Australian medical services framework may face two major challenges: (a) focusing on quality and outcomes of patients (b) assignment of assets (Lock, 2019). It emphasises the importance of evaluating the present subsidy process, providing patients with decision-making options, and continually analysing the adequacy of therapy.
Abstract of Policy
Owing to changing healthcare requirements, Australian Health care system has been under severe strain. Increased demand and expenses, disparities, complicated health issues and a desire to improve results are among them.
An independent evaluation of Australia's healthcare system discovered substantial inefficiencies and personnel shortages, as well as a desire for more public reporting on the availability of essential services. Policymakers are recommended to focus on quality care, needs of the patient and patient involvement in healthcare delivery, as well as the restructuring of financial a
angements (Lock, 2019).
A comprehensive examination of Australia's healthcare system in comparison to those of other advanced economies is required. The Australian federal, state and te
itory governments have released a variety of publications and statistics pertaining to Australia's healthcare industry. This article examines the Australian healthcare system and, when appropriate, compares it to those of other sophisticated nations to highlight the need for change.
The article gives an overview of Australia's public healthcare system. The National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA) of 2011 illustrates the financing structure for public hospitals in Australia (Guo, Tang, Wang & Zhao, 2019). It sheds light on the major concerns and issues confronting Australia's healthcare system. The essay ends with a conversation to emphasise the importance of change.
Research Criteria     
In four steps, information and data were gathered by conducting a search of relevant peer-reviewed publications, reports, book chapters and academic books. First, a comprehensive search of electronic databases at Google scholarly, Australia, was done. These searches were conducted using the terms Australian healthcare system, hospital financing, hospital care, Australian healthcare, Australia and healthcare.
Second, using the aforementioned terms, a
oad Google search was run. Third, a concentrated article on the Australian Productivity Commission, the AIHW's and Commonwealth of Australia's was done to uncover healthcare data relevant to Australia and other sophisticated health systems. Lastly, , the authors' EndNote reference li
aries were used to choose references linked to bureaucratic capacity and policy implementation mistake.
Key Elements of Policy
Ministerial Forward
There are three types of healthcare systems in the globe, with the hy
id model combining the market models and welfare state. Healthcare is paid for with tax dollars in a social welfare model, and the government is solely responsible for delivering healthcare services. The Australian healthcare system is a hy
id model in which nationals, residents, and immigrants can purchase private insurance on top of their existing public health insurance and have access to both private and public hospitals.
In the period 2010–2014, Australia had the lowest public health spending as a proportion of total health expenditure in four nations with similar health systems, compared to France, Belgium and Canada (Guo et al., 2019). The management and approval of healthcare services is required for the government to provide healthcare.
Vision Statement
The vision of Australia’s healthcare system is to provide Australians with the finest health. A sustainable, robust and responsive primary health care system that improves chronic condition management, reduces the need for hospital services, prevents disease and keeps people well, particularly those who now face inequitable health outcomes (Smith et al., 2018).
Goals
The Commonwealth, te
itory governments and state governments have agreed to collaborate to guarantee the primary health care system's continued development and sustainability,...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here