Assessment 1 – Quality improvement proposal
Due date:Sunday25thAugust 2019
Length:2,000 words
Mark loading:60%
Those of you who undertook NSG2104 in Semester 1 will remember you were required to conduct a literature review based on one of the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Taking the Health Services Standard you selected, you are now required to develop a quality improvement project based on the Health Services Standard you addressed previously.
The content of the proposal will include: the background of the project; statement of the problem; significance or importance of the problem; a brief review of related literature; the premise of the project; the aim of your QI project, assumptions, definitions and measurements; outline of the project procedure and the use of appropriate improvement approach (PDSA for example); how findings might be disseminated. See the suggested framework (below) for how you might present your proposal.
This task consists of a 5 step process.
STEP 1Download theAssignment 1 Templateand complete thee-Cover page. You MUST use thistemplate for your assignment. Make sure you have usedYourLastname_YourFirstnameas your filenaming format. For example: If a student called Sarah Kingston was submitting her assignment, she would name her file...
Kingston_Sarah_Assignment_1.docx
It is critical you use this naming convention.
If you do not use this format you will force me to rename the file. This takes me a lot of extra time andputs me in a negative frame of mind before I start marking your paper. This is not a good idea if youwant to maximise your marks!

STEP 2:Download and complete theAssignment Improvement Plan.
STEP 3:Using the required file naming convention, submit your Assignment Improvement Plan to theImprovement Plan Submission Dropbox. Your Turnitin Dropbox will not be accessible until you have completed this step.
STEP 4:Once you have completed Step 3, submit your assignment via the Turnitin Dropbox to have it checked by Turnitin.Once you have submitted yourassignment, you can view the similarity report online. If your paper has a Similarity Index of> 20%you havethe opportunity to correct any potential plagiarismBEFOREyou lodge your assignment. It is CRITICAL you do this to avoid an accusation of plagiarism.PLEASE NOTE:Turnitin Dropboxeswill close atMidnighton theSaturday priorto submission.
STEP 5Submit your assignment via theNSG2204 DropBox.

Assignment 1 Sample Papers
I have included two actual student proposals below. While they are very good, I would suggest they are not absolutely perfect (is there such a thing?). If you can emulate the general approach taken by these proposals, you should do well.What you should avoid is trying to copy the wording or mimicking the style in which they are written. YouWILLlose marks if you do this.
Click the PDF icon to download Example 1.
Click the PDF icon to download Example 2.
Click the PDF icon to download a suggested framework for this assignment.
Marking Rubric
Click the PDF icon to download the Assignment 1 Marking Rubric.
Assignment 1 Marking Criteria
Marking Criteria | MARKS |
| 3 |
- Statement of the Problem / Clinical Question
| 3 |
- Relevance of project to clinical practice
| 5 |
| 10 |
- Application of appropriate improvement approach (e.g. PDSA)
| 15 |
- Dissemination of findings
| 5 |
|
- Written work is of the required length and is presented in the correct format
| 2 |
- Submission is written in a manner consistent with academic essay writing
| 3 |
- Spelling and grammar are correct
| 2 |
- Written communication is concise and avoids unnecessary repetition
| 1 |
- Content is appropriately objective and demonstrates a critical approach to the subject matter
| 5 |
- Sources and quotes are acknowledged and referenced according to APA 6th reference style
| 3 |
- Sources used to support information are reputable and current
| 3 |
Total marks available = | 60 |