November 11, 2008
2
MIDTERM ASSIGNMENT
Option 1: Students will be asked to focus on one specific sports psychological intervention (e.g., imagery, mindfulness,
eathing techniques) and describe a controversy in the literature around that intervention. Papers should highlight the intervention, describe the history of research in the area, and discuss conflicting evidence su
ounding the intervention.
Option 2: Students can decide to watch “The Last Dance,” (3 episodes) or “Icarus” and create an assignment around an important sports psychological element which was highlighted in the film. Students should: introduce the aspect of sports psychology which was presented in the film and how it fit with the greater na
ative, cite peer reviewed literature pertaining to the topic at hand, and discuss the ways in which the film either confirmed or disconfirmed our theoretical understanding of the construct. For example, in “The Last Dance” the root of Michael Jordan’s motivational drive is explored. What does the
oader literature say about motivation in an athlete like Jordan? How does the film either confirm or disconfirm the theoretical knowledge that we have about motivation in sport?
For both options be specific! Focus on one aspect of the intervention and the conflicting evidence related to that aspect, rather than trying to describe every controversy you notice in the literature OR on one aspect of sport psychology you identify in the film, rather than trying to talk about and link multiple aspects. The more specific and focused you are, the more space you will have to provide an in depth and convincing argument.
The paper should be 8 pages in length (excluding references) and submitted in APA format. Anything past page 8 will not be graded.
Midterm Ru
ic: (/50)
Introduction (15)
- concise and appropriate review of related literature.
- provides a compelling and clear purpose statement (what should the reader know by the end of the paper?)
- sections flow logically and smoothly from one to another; strong writing and gramma
Discussion/Critical Reflection (25)
- student clearly connects research findings with controversy OR component film
- student articulates how research findings are related to/support their main argument
- description of the implications of the findings (what does all of this mean? Why is it important?)
- substantial, logical, & concrete development of ideas; assumptions are made explicit; information presented is original, and literature is convincingly interpreted
References and APA Formatting** (10)
- comprehensive list of references (Combines material from a variety of sources, incl. pers. observation, scientific data, authoritative testimony)
- inclusion of recent, peer reviewed journal sources (minimum 10 references)
- uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of ideas
- doesn’t overuse quotes
- appropriate use of headings and sub-headings, adherence to APA formatting throughout pape
- strong writing and grammar (sequence of ideas & transitions are effective)
Total (out of 50)
** Note: Students will be heavily penalized for typos, spelling and grammatical e
ors in all written material presented (up to 10% of total grade). Be very critical of your writing and careful in the delivery. Plagiarism will not be tolerated on any level whatsoever. If plagiarism is observed, student will receive a zero on this assignment.
55 Ha
ord Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2W6 Canada
www.physical.utoronto.ca
55 Ha
ord Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2W6 Canada
Page 2 of 2
www.physical.utoronto.ca
PII: S XXXXXXXXXX
BEHAVIOR THERAPY 35, XXXXXXXXXX, 2004
A Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment-Based Approach
to Athletic Performance Enhancement:
Theoretical Considerations
F~aNI~ L. GARDNER
ZELLA E. MOORE
La Salle University
While traditional cognitive-behavioral skills-training-based approaches to athletic
performance enhancement posit that negative thoughts and emotions must be con-
trolled, eliminated, or replaced for athlete-clients to perform optimally, recent evi-
dence suggests that efforts to control, eliminate, or suppress these internal states
may actually have the opposite effect. Interventions based on mindfulness and ac-
ceptance suggest that internal cognitive and emotional states need not be eliminated,
changed, or controlled in order to facilitate positive behavioral outcomes. Rather, it
is suggested that an alternative or supplemental approach to the enhancement of ath-
letic performance may be achieved through strategies and techniques that target the
development of mindful (nonjudgmental) present-moment acceptance of internal
experiences such as thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations, along with a clarifi-
cation of valued goals and enhanced attention to external cues, responses, and con-
tingencies that are required for optimal athletic performance.
Applied sport psychology, in its efforts to enhance the competitive perfor-
mance of athletes, has traditionally utilized cognitive behavioral methods and
techniques with an emphasis on developing self-control of internal states,
commonly refe
ed to as psychological skills training (Whelan, Mahoney, &
Meyers, XXXXXXXXXXIn contrast, behavioral theorists in professional psychology
have recently begun to advocate and demonstrate empirical support for inter-
ventions that emphasize acceptance, rather than direct change, suppression,
or control, of cognitive and affective experiences (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson,
1999; Roemer & Orsillo, 2002; Segal, Williams, & Teasdale, 2002).
With modern meta-cognitive and acceptance-based theory, research, and
practice as a foundation, and theoretical aspects of self-regulatory processes in
athletic performance carefully considered, the purpose of this article is to present
a new approach to performance enhancement that, adapted and developed
Address co
espondence to Frank L. Gardner, Department of Psychology, La Salle Univer-
sity, 1900 W. Olney Avenue, Box 842, Philadelphia, PA 19141; e-maih XXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXX/04/0707~3723 $1.00/0
Copyright 2004 by Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy
All rights for reproduction in any form reserved.
708 GARDNER & MOORE
specifically for use with an athletic population, may elaborate on and increase
the effectiveness of traditional performance enhancement approaches. This
approach is refe
ed to as Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment (MAC) based
performance enhancement, and is adapted from clinical models of Accep-
tance and Commitment Therapy (Hayes et al., 1999) and Mindfulness-Based
Cognitive Therapy (Segal et al., XXXXXXXXXXThis innovative approach to athletic
performance enhancement efforts is markedly different in both theoretical
assumptions and intervention strategies and techniques from the traditional
psychological skills training approaches that have to date dominated applied
sport psychology.
Historical Development of Psychological Skills Training
Historically, efforts to enhance athletic performance have been most clearly
elated to the development of social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1977) and
early skills training models of cognitive-behavioral interventions (Meichen-
aum, XXXXXXXXXXFrom this perspective, athletes develop and utilize psychologi-
cal (mental) skills such as goal setting, imagery/mental rehearsal, arousal
control, self-talk, and precompetitive routines as vehicles to aid in the devel-
opment of self-control of internal processes such as thoughts, emotions, and
odily sensations, in an attempt to create the ideal performance state (Hardy,
Jones, & Gould, 1996).
Within the domain of interventions for athletic performance enhancement,
a number of authors frequently describe and support the use of psychological
skills training (PST) procedures, while concu
ently commenting on the
inconsistent and inconclusive empirical support for such approaches (Burton,
Naylor, & Holliday, 2001; Gould, Damarjian, & Greenleaf, 2002; Gould &
Udry, 1994; Meyers, Whelan, & Murphy, 1996; Weinberg, 1994, 2002; Wil-
liams & Leffingwell, 2002; Zaichkowsy & B altzell, 2001).
In addition, questions may be raised regarding the theoretical assumptions
that are at the foundation of these procedures. Fundamental to PST is the long-
held assumption that reduction of negative emotions and bodily states, and
associated increases in positive cognitions and confidence levels, are directly
elated to an "ideal performance state," which in turn is directly related to
optimal athletic performance (Hardy et al., XXXXXXXXXXBased primarily on co
e-
lational studies, practitioners of sport psychology have long accepted the
notion that more successful performers are less anxious, more confident, and
experience fewer negative thoughts (Gould, Eklund, & Jackson, 1992; Gould,
Weiss, & Weinberg, 1981; Orlick & Partington, XXXXXXXXXXWhat follows from
this theoretical position is the related assumption that interventions target-
ing the enhancement of athletic performance focus on supplanting negative
thoughts with positive ones and reducing or controlling negative affective
states (Hardy et al., 1996).
In those few studies that have carefully studied the mechanisms of change
mediating traditional PST procedures and competitive performance, results
MAC P E R F O R M A N C E E N H A N C E M E N T 709
have generally not been supportive of the assumptions made in the use of tra-
ditional psychological skills training procedures. These studies, utilizing a
variety of different sports, suggest that reduction in "negative" affective states
such as anxiety, and/or increases in self-confidence, do not consistently result
in significant increases in athletic performance (Burton, 1989; Daw & Burton,
1994; Holm, Beckwith, Ehde, & Tinius, 1996; Maynard, Smith, & Warwick-
Evans, 1995; Murphy & Woolfolk, 1987; Weinberg, Seabourne, & Jackson,
1981). This conclusion receives additional support from a recent study by Cohen
and colleagues (Cohen, Pargman, & Tannenbaum, 2003) in which physiolog-
ical arousal was experimentally manipulated during a dart-throwing competi-
tion. The results of this study found no relationship between arousal levels
and actual performance. In addition, a recent meta-analysis examined the
effects of competitive anxiety and self-confidence on athletic performance
(Craft, Magyar, Becker, & Feltz, XXXXXXXXXXIn this review, using multivariate
meta-analytic techniques, characteristics such as design features, subjects,
and type of sport were separately coded. From this analysis, the authors con-
cluded that a weak relationship appears to exist between competitive anxiety,
self-confidence, and athletic performance.
It should be noted that these studies are limited by their assumption that all
athletes are at nonclinical levels of anxiety or other affective states and thus
would all benefit from a single intervention protocol based upon a common
goal of enhancing athletic performance. It may very well be that those ath-
letes for whom anxiety (or other affective states) is at subsyndromal or actual
clinical levels might benefit from different interventions than those whose
anxiety/affective levels are at nonclinical levels. That being said, these studies
do suggest that for a number of athletes, reduction of anxiety (with co
e-
sponding reduction of "negative" thinking and increases in self-confidence)
may have little significant impact on actual competitive performance enhance-
ment. This in turn suggests the