Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Another key part of NoTable's success is its designers, highly-paid artists who design the tables with and for customers. They currently have five designers, and one is assigned to each purchase...

1 answer below »

Another key part of NoTable's success is its designers, highly-paid artists who design the tables with and for customers. They currently have five designers, and one is assigned to each purchase order. They meet extensively with each of the customers and develop comprehensive specifications.


Production steps and required raw materials are specified with the highest level of detail. Accuracy of cost estimates are of utmost importance for NoTable given that they determine a table's price.


You receive data generated by NoTable's ERP system that show the estimated and actual labor and material cost in dollars for each production order (table). You can find these data in the PurchaseOrders worksheet. You are asked to analyze how accurate the design specifications are both overall and among designers.



  1. Determine and analvze the overall variances.

  2. Compare variances among designers.


Please download the Excel input file. complete your Excel file. create your Word file. and submit (upload) your completed Excel and Word files.

Answered 3 days After Nov 19, 2023

Solution

Khushboo answered on Nov 23 2023
22 Votes
PurchaseOrders
    PurchaseOrderId    Status    QuotedLeadTime    ActualLeadTime    Supplier    LaborEstimate    RawMaterialEstimate    LaborActual    RawMaterialActual    Designer    Designer Name    DeliveryStatus    Variances in material cost    Variances in Labor cost
    1    Delivered    30    28    1    28560.3    31416.33    26656.28    35224.37    1    Michelle Angelo    On Time    -3,808.04    1,904.02        Overall variances
    2    Delivered    30    45    3    1901.55    2263.75    2807.05    2535.4    5    Clara Walker    Disruptive    -271.65    -905.50        Particulars    Budgeted     Actual    Difference    Favorable/Unfavorable
    3    Canceled    45    48    2    22416.52    20815.34    22416.52    29621.83    4    Alexandra Nanini    Cancelled    -8,806.49    - 0        Raw Material Cost    1249300.62    1230894.16    18406.46    Favorable
    4    Canceled    60        5    31322.72    19470.88    30476.16    26243.36    4    Alexandra Nanini    Cancelled    -6,772.48    846.56        Labor cost    1275584.72    1250193.7    25391.02    Favorable
    5    Delivered    90        6    30709.82    27096.9    23483.98    25290.44    5    Clara Walker    Early    1,806.46    7,225.84
    6    Delivered    120    133    3    5356.12    6312.57    4399.67    6503.86    5    Clara Walker    Late    -191.29    956.45
    7    Returned    60    63    2    14657.76    14250.6    15879.24    10993.32    3    Pie
e Peiyo    Returned    3,257.28    -1,221.48
    8    Delivered    30    42    1    25033.8    17447.8    16689.2    21999.4    3    Pie
e Peiyo    Disruptive    -4,551.60    8,344.60
    9    Returned    30        5    20146.62    22471.23    17822.01    15497.4    5    Clara Walker    Returned    6,973.83    2,324.61
    10    Delivered    60    75    3    28459.44    31403.52    29440.8    23552.64    5    Clara Walker    Disruptive    7,850.88    -981.36        ID    DesignerName    Raw Material Cost    Labor cost    Total variance
    11    Returned    30        2    8283    8283    7730.8    9387.4    4    Alexandra Nanini    Returned    -1,104.40    552.20        1    Michelle Angelo    19,757.81    -6,048.40    13,709.41
    12    Delivered    90    100    3    17558.72    21399.69    10974.2    13169.04    3    Pie
e Peiyo    Late    8,230.65    6,584.52        2    Vincent Monet    -12,033.96    5,578.25    -6,455.71
    13    Canceled    45    46    1    11542.72    11542.72    8657.04    10460.59    5    Clara Walker    Cancelled    1,082.13    2,885.68        3    Pie
e Peiyo    8,150.81    57,513.74    65,664.55
    14    Delivered    15    15    4    30997.05    20369.49    29225.79    23912.01    2    Vincent Monet    On Time    -3,542.52    1,771.26        4    Alexandra Nanini    -27,712.40    -27,618.44    -55,330.84
    15    Delivered    30    30    4    20634.04    16212.46    22107.9    16949.39    2    Vincent Monet    On Time    -736.93    -1,473.86        5    Clara Walker    30,244.20    -4,034.13    26,210.07
    16    Canceled            5    16238.75    16238.75    24033.35    14939.65    4    Alexandra Nanini    Cancelled    1,299.10    -7,794.60
    17    Delivered    45    40    2    7426.24    9363.52    9040.64    7426.24    5    Clara Walker    Early    1,937.28    -1,614.40
    18    Delivered    45    75    6    19417.97    13120.25    11545.82    11021.01    5    Clara Walker    Disruptive    2,099.24    7,872.15
    19    Delivered    30    29    1    12918.32    12501.6    10834.72    8334.4    3    Pie
e Peiyo    On Time    4,167.20    2,083.60
    20    Returned            5    30191.35    31053.96    31916.57    21565.25    5    Clara Walker    Returned    9,488.71    -1,725.22
    21    Delivered    30    32    2    24288.28    16411    18380.32    14441.68    2    Vincent Monet    On Time    1,969.32    5,907.96
    22    Delivered    30    29    4    1188.2    1960.53    1366.43    2198.17    4    Alexandra Nanini    On Time    -237.64    -178.23
    23    Delivered    45    40    6    32941.24    22283.78    36816.68    26159.22    2    Vincent Monet    Early    -3,875.44    -3,875.44
    24    Delivered    45    123    5    33989.46    19993.8    36988.53    34989.15    5    Clara...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here