Annotated Bibliography: This work can serve as preliminary research for your final research essay. An annotation for one source should be a concise summary of the main points of that particular source...

Running Head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY    1
THE HISTORY OF HEALTH CARE ETHICS        2
HEALTHCARE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
THE HISTORY OF HEALTH CARE ETHICS
Table of Contents
Annotation 1    3
Annotation 2    3
Annotation 3    4
Annotation 4    4
Annotation 5    5
Annotation 6    6
Annotation 7    6
Annotation 8    7
Annotation 9    8
Annotation 10    8
References    10
Annotation 1:
Marckmann, G., Schmidt, H., Sofaer, N., & Strech, D. (2015). Putting public health ethics into practice: a systematic framework. Frontiers in public health, 3, 23 Retrieved from https:
core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82883606.pdf
Recent issues are related to healthcare ethics. Several numbers of healthcare ethics are proposed in the health care system. However, none of them gives a
ief account of the methodological approach and a normative foundation. According to Marckmann, Schmidt, Sofaer and Strech (2015), the coherentist model of justification is able to set a systematic framework for an analysis of the healthcare ethics. It is able to tie together empirical evidence and ethical analysis. The proposed framework may monitor the quantity of ethical evaluation in public health systems. The structure is good to study the implication of the ethics of public health care practices. Mover over it can suggest to examining for academic ethics, health technology, public health professional and health policymakers.
Annotation 2:
Kangasniemi, M., Pakkanen, P., & Korhonen, A. (2015). Professional ethics in nursing: an integrative review. Journal of advanced nursing, 71(8), 1744-1757. Retrieved from https:
www.researchgate.net/profile/Piiku_Pakkanen/publication/271139792_Professional_ethics_in_nursing_An_integrative_review/links/5ac73e320f7e9bcd51933978/Professional-ethics-in-nursing-An-integrative-review.pdf
Kangasniemi, Pakkanen and Korhonen (2015) studied that ethics of nursing are seldom studied and examined. Professional ethics forms the basis for the nursing profession. It includes nurse’s rights, values, duties and responsibilities when nurses communicate with patients, colleagues, customers and doctors. Professional ethics' main purpose is to teach the professional behavior and contribution of nurses in society. Due to the profession's status, cu
ent regulations and laws, professional ethics is changing. There is a risk that ethics of nursing profession cannot guide professionals in practice. The nurses should be aware of the ethical decision-making in healthcare, which is changing on daily basis. Thus, it is a scientific responsibility to focus on ethics in the healthcare system for nursing.
Annotation 3:
Newson, A. J., Leonard, S. J., Hall, A., & Gaff, C. L. (2016). Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine. BMC medical genomics, 9(1), 57. Retrieved from https:
mcmedgenomics.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12920-016-0219-0
Newson, Leonard, Hall and Gaff (2016) focused on the uncertainty in genomic testing. They suggest that ethical concepts can guide uncertain situations. It is able to handle welfare, solidarity, autonomy, and resilience. The authors draft the ethical response and conceptual approach to the various uncertain conditions in genomic medicine. The healthcare professional, who is working in genomics, should not more focus on removing uncertainty, because when they try to eliminate one kind of uncertainty, it can introduce other kinds. The various practices suggested that good ethics are helpful to decrease the doubts in the healthcare system and it will help to increases the improvement in systems. Authors claimed that the ethics, which are built for vanishes uncertainty in the genomic field can exploit additional ethical concepts.
Annotation 4:
Molewijk, B., Hem, M. H., & Pedersen, R. (2015). Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care. BMC medical ethics, 16(1), 4 Retrieved from https:
mcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1472-6939-16-4
According to Molewijk, Hem and Pedersen (2015), there is a
oad variety when the healthcare professionals deal with ethical challenges. A constructive approach to ethical challenges within the team can be a particular challenge, especially if it involves or leads to disagreement. Sometimes, disagreement becomes a positive necessity to find out how to reach an opinion on good care and cooperate well, while the disagreement in some teams led to another ethical challenge that threatened...