PLEASE DO NOT WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT AS AN ESSAY.. JUST WRITE LIKE YOU DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEACHER
Need about 400 words per bellow requirements and using articles attached in needed
Dear expert you have wrote assignment attached and my teacher made comments bellow please read teacher comments bellow and do the following :-
1- Make a deep discussion with this essay ?
2- Provide example?
3- Give suggestions?
4- You should therefore be offering new ideas in response?
5- Ask 3 insightful questions?
Dear expert
You MUST use the following references and you MUST include them in in references list
Book citation: Baldock, J., Manning, N., and Vickerstaff, S. (eds XXXXXXXXXXSocial Policy (4th edition). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
· Article 1 citation: George, V XXXXXXXXXXPolitical ideology, globalisation and welfare futures in Europe, Journal of Social Policy, 27: 17-36.
·
· Article 2 citation: Bam
a, C., Fox, D. and Scott-Samuel, A XXXXXXXXXXA politics of health glossary, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61:571-574.
Teacher comments and questions
You observe that "There is a need for analyzing the relationship between high labour cost and low employment within region; there is also need for evaluating the position of women in the welfare policies of the nation, it is said that women are at most disadvantageous position (Diefenbarcher & Zieschank, 2009)."
Let us think wider: According to Esping-Andersen (2000 cited in Kroger, 2011), the concept of decommodification “captures one important dimension of freedom and constraint in the everyday life of advanced capitalism” because by decreasing market dependency, decommodifying social policy “creates greater space for individuals to control their lives”. In a way, decommodification is a process whereby welfare states reduce citizens’ economic dependency on the market, replacing it with a dependency on welfare benefits. But there was inequity in the use of this concept within social policy realms. Coming more for feminism, decommodification measured “wrong” issues; it was not dependency on the labour market but dependency on the family that was the primary problem that social policy should solve argued that patriarchal family structures cause many women to be economically dependent on their husbands (or fathers or
others) and the solution is not to be found from decommodification but from the opposite direction, from commodification of women, and thus welfare states should actively support women’s entry to the labour force.
Instead of “opting out of work”, women need support from social policy to “opt out of family” and to “opt into work”. One of the alternative concepts that was soon developed within feminist scholarship as a more gender-sensitive or woman-friendly benchmark for comparative welfare state research was defamilisation where welfare regimes can now be characterized by according to the degree to which individual adults can uphold a socially acceptable standard of living, independently of family relationships, either through paid work or through the social security system.
There are equally other concepts such as dedomestiction; whereas decommodification is a counter force to the process of commodification, which turns people into commodities that are sold and bought in the labour market, dedomestication represents a counteraction to the strong and gendered societal pressures that separate the domestic sphere and the “public” sphere from each other.
How do you deem these alternative concepts and strategies against charity dependency in this regard?
MY REQUIREMENTS:-
PLEASE READ ARTICLES ATTACHED BEFORE START WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT.
Need about 5 references
1- PLEASE WRITE THIS ASSIGNMET ON DEPTH (GENERAL WRITING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE).
2- Referencing (in text citation) should be evident in the discussions.
3- You MUST use author name and page number on essay while writing. Like this (Kaplan,2006 p.24). should be evident in the discussions.
4- Please you should choose examples from your own experience or find appropriate cases on the Web that you can discuss.
5- Please use Harvard style.
6- Referencing (in text citation) should be evident in the discussions.
MUST IMPORTANT NOTE
Your writing should not submitted before to any others colleges.
PLEASE
DO NOT
WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT AS AN ESSAY..
JUST WRITE LIKE YOU DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEACHER
Need about
400
words per bellow requirements
and using articles
attached in needed
Dear expert
you
have wrote assignment attached and my teacher
made comments
ellow
please read
teacher comments
ellow
and do the following
:
-
1
-
Make a deep discussion with this essay ?
2
-
Provide example?
3
-
Give suggestions?
4
-
You should therefore be offering new ideas in response?
5
-
Ask 3 insightful questions?
Dear expert
You MUST use the following references and you MUST
include them in in references list
Book citation:
Baldock, J., Manning, N., and Vickerstaff, S.
(eds XXXXXXXXXXSocial Policy (4th edition). Oxford, Oxford
University Press.
Article 1 citation:
George, V XXXXXXXXXXPolitical ideology,
globalisation and welfare futures in Europe,
Journal of
Social Policy
, 27: 17
-
36.
Article 2 citation:
Bam
a, C., Fox, D. and Scott
-
Samuel,
A XXXXXXXXXXA politics of health glossary,
Journal of
Epidemiology and Communit
y Health
, 61:571
-
574.
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT AS AN ESSAY..
JUST WRITE LIKE YOU DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEACHER
Need about 400 words per bellow requirements and using articles
attached in needed
Dear expert you have wrote assignment attached and my teacher
made comments bellow please read teacher comments bellow
and do the following :-
1- Make a deep discussion with this essay ?
2- Provide example?
3- Give suggestions?
4- You should therefore be offering new ideas in response?
5- Ask 3 insightful questions?
Dear expert
You MUST use the following references and you MUST
include them in in references list
Book citation: Baldock, J., Manning, N., and Vickerstaff, S.
(eds XXXXXXXXXXSocial Policy (4th edition). Oxford, Oxford
University Press.
Article 1 citation: George, V XXXXXXXXXXPolitical ideology,
globalisation and welfare futures in Europe, Journal of
Social Policy, 27: 17-36.
Article 2 citation: Bam
a, C., Fox, D. and Scott-Samuel,
A XXXXXXXXXXA politics of health glossary, Journal of
Epidemiology and Community Health, 61:571-574.
title
Journal of Social Policy
http:
journals.cam
idge.org/JSP
Additional services for Journal of Social Policy:
Email alerts: Click here
Subscriptions: Click here
Commercial reprints: Click here
Terms of use : Click here
Political Ideology, Globalisation and Welfare
Futures in Europe
VIC GEORGE
Journal of Social Policy / Volume 27 / Issue 01 / January 1998, pp 17 36
DOI: null, Published online: 08 September 2000
Link to this article: http:
journals.cam
idge.org/abstract_S XXXXXXXXXX
How to cite this article:
VIC GEORGE (1998). Political Ideology, Globalisation and Welfare Futures in Europe.
Journal of Social Policy, 27, pp 1736
Request Permissions : Click here
Downloaded from http:
journals.cam
idge.org/JSP, IP address: XXXXXXXXXX on 19 Jun 2013
http:
journals.cam
idge.org Downloaded: 19 Jun 2013 IP address: XXXXXXXXXX
Political Ideology, Globalisation and Welfare Futures
in Europe
V I C G E O RG E *
A B S T R AC T
A study of elite opinion on the nature and future of the welfare state in
six European countries, conducted during 1994, found that most of the
traditional differences of opinion between left and right were still valid.
Public opinion studies have consistently found strong support for state
welfare. Yet during the past decade or so, governments in Europe have
een pursuing policies that are largely similar in the sense that they are
leading towards the containment and retrenchment of state welfare. The
pressures of economic globalisation and of national structural factors
have led to the replacement of the dominant social democratic expan-
sionist model of welfare with the neo-liberal contractionist model. The
esult is that in the same way that governments of the right pursued
expansionist policies of welfare during the reign of the social democratic
model in the 1960s and early 1970s, governments of the left have in the
past few years pursued policies of containment and contraction and they
are likely to continue do to so in the foreseeable future.
P O L I T I C A L I D E O L O G Y A N D T H E F U T U R E O F W E L FA R E I N E U RO P E
The relationship between ideology and welfare provision has been
explored in at least four different ways in the social policy literature: first,
y examining the position of different ideological schools of thought
egarding state welfare; second, national and comparative studies of pub-
lic opinion on social welfare; third, comparative literature on the rela-
tionship between the party political nature of the government and the
type of social policies pursued; and fourth, studies of the opinions of elite
groups in society concerning welfare at the national or comparative
Jnl Soc. Pol., 27, 1, 17–36 Printed in the United Kingdom 17
© 1998 Cam
idge University Press
* Vic George, Emeritus Professor of Social Policy, University of Kent at Cante
ury, Kent CT2 7NY.
Thanks for discussion: Peter A
ahamson, Giuliano Bonoli, Karen George, Tetty Havinga, Roge
Lawson, Paul Minderhoud, Hann Warming-Nielsen, Bruno Palier, Berndt Schulte, Peter Stathopoulos,
Peter Taylor-Gooby and Jan Terpstra. And acknowledged for financial support: ESRC, the Anglo-
German Foundation, the European Union DGV, COSZ the Netherlands, and the University of Kent.
http:
journals.cam
idge.org
http:
journals.cam
idge.org Downloaded: 19 Jun 2013 IP address: XXXXXXXXXX
level. This particular project belongs to the last category, a rather under-
esearched area.
This section of the article is based on the findings of a European study
of elite opinion on the future of welfare. Interviews with 144 respondents
were conducted during May to October 1994 in six member countries of
the European Union – Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Netherlands
and the UK – with the highest number of 26 respondents in Greece and
the lowest of 20 in the Netherlands. The countries were chosen to repre-
sent different social policy traditions: the social democracy of Denmark,
the corporatism of Germany and France, the liberalism of the UK; differ-
ent regions in Europe: northern, central and southern; varying levels of
economic development and affluence in Europe; different levels of social
expenditure: 28.8 per cent of GDP in the Netherlands in 1990, 27.8 pe
cent in Denmark, 26.5 in France, 23.5 in Germany, 22.3 in the UK and
20.9 in Greece (OECD, 1994, Table 1c, p. 60). The research team at UKC
established good academic contacts in all the countries covered by the
project and this proved invaluable at all the stages of the project.
Respondents consisted of politicians from the main political parties,
epresentatives of trade unions, the business community, the voluntary
societies and,