7 double spaced pages plus references (which are not included in the word count). Please number your pages. Use any reference style you like, as long as you are consistent, and your references provide...

The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was a major impetus for the development of the Belmont Report and research regulations in the U.S
Introduction
When the United States Public Health Service conducted clinical research in Tuskegee, Alabama, from 1932 and 1972 to determine the prevalence of syphilis, they did it in collaboration with the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (TSX). An investigation into the natural progression of untreated syphilis among 400 Afro-American sharecroppers (the majority of whom were illiterate) was conducted to discover how the sickness progressed from the moment of infection until their death as a result of the illness.
As a result of the publication of this experiment, there was a great deal of discussion, which finally resulted in modifications to the law protecting patients who participate in clinical research. Subjects who took part in this experiment did not provide informed consent; they were not informed of their diagnosis and were told that they were being treated for "bad blood," which was not the case. They were also not informed of their condition, which was not the case. The participants were also told that, in exchange for agreeing to participate in the research, they would receive free medical care, complimentary transportation to the clinic, complimentary meals, and complimentary funeral insurance in the case of their death. Additionally, it was recommended that subjects refrain from obtaining penicillin treatment because it was already being supplied to other patients in the proximity.
As early as 1932, syphilis treatments were exceedingly poisonous, potentially fatal, and of questionable efficacy, prompting the start of the investigation. In addition to determining if the treatment's advantages outweighed its hazards, the study's other objectives included identifying the different stages of cancer and developing treatments that were appropriate for each stage. In a 40-year study, doctors recruited 399 black men who were supposedly afflicted with syphilis to take part in a study to examine the evolution of the disease and the effectiveness of therapy. 201 healthy men served as a control group for the study, and their results were compared to the results of the other groups.
In 1947, penicillin had exceeded all previous therapies for syphilis in terms of popularity, and was the treatment of choice. Before this discovery, syphilis was often associated with a chronic, painful condition that finally failed several organs. As part of the Tuskegee experiment's initial phase, the scientists in charge of it decided to keep it a secret that the patients were being treated with penicillin rather than treating them and calling it quits or creating a control group to investigate the drug's effects. This enabled them to continue their investigation into how the disease developed and eventually ended in mortality.
It wasn't until 1972 that a leaked copy of the research was made public, marking the conclusion of the probe. By then, 28 of the 399 patients had died as a consequence of syphilis, and another 100 had died as a result of medical complications as a result of the infection. Another 40 patients' spouses contracted the disease, and 19 children were born with the disease. Additional illnesses developed in the spouses of the patients, as well.
As a result of the Tuskegee experiment, the Belmont Report was published in 1979, and it resulted in the founding of the National Human Investigation Board and a suggestion for the establishment of institutional review committees in medical institutions (IRBs).
Ascension of the Patient-Centered Medical Home
In response to instances of serious medical and scientific misbehavior that resulted in the damage of patients and study subjects, medical ethics arose as a discipline. The Seattle "God Committee" and the Tuskegee syphilis experiment were two significant events in the formation of medical ethics, providing the motivation for placing respect for autonomy at the centre of the patient–doctor relationship. Both the Seattle "God...